Biblija

 

Genesis 30:35

Studija

       

35 En hij zonderde af ten zelfden dage de gesprenkelde en geplekte bokken en al de gespikkelde en geplekte geiten, al waar wit aan was, en al het bruine onder de lammeren; en hij gaf dezelve in de hand zijner zonen.

Iz Swedenborgovih djela

 

Arcana Coelestia #3979

Proučite ovaj odlomak

  
/ 10837  
  

3979. 'Laban said to him' means perception from the good meant by Laban. This is clear from the meaning of 'saying' as perception, dealt with in 1898, 1919, 2080, 2619, 2862, 3395, 3509, and from the representation of 'Laban' as a parallel good from the Divine, dealt with in 3612, 3665, 3778. The reason why it is perception from this good that is meant by 'Laban said to him' is that in the Word persons mean nothing else than spiritual realities. In the highest sense Divine things present in the Lord are meant, in the internal sense the kind of things present in man which are discussed here, so that two persons are used to mean two things present in the same individual.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

Iz Swedenborgovih djela

 

Arcana Coelestia #3612

Proučite ovaj odlomak

  
/ 10837  
  

3612. 'Flee to Laban my brother, to Haran' means in the direction of the affection for external or bodily good. This is clear from the representation of 'Laban' as the affection for good in the natural man, dealt with in 3129, 3130, 3160, and from the meaning of 'Haran' as that which is external and therefore obscure in comparison with other things, dealt with in 1430. But what precisely 'Laban' and 'Haran' mean here becomes clear from what appears further on where Laban and Haran are mentioned; that is to say, a parallel good that springs from a common stock is meant. Indeed goods and truths are interrelated as parents, brothers, blood relatives, and relatives by marriage are in families, 685, 917, 2508, 2524, 2556, 2739. But these matters are completely concealed from anyone in whom the life of good is not present. He does not even know what good is, nor consequently what truth is. If he first knew these - that is to say, knew from doctrine coupled to life, or from life coupled to doctrine - he would know and discern countless things concerning good and truth, gradually knowing them more and more distinctly. He would eventually come to know and discern their various links and relationships to each other and at length their close ties to each other within their lines of descent, and again in each close relationship countless more things He would in the end accordingly know and discern heaven and the form it takes, that is, its beauty and happiness.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.