유도는 상대의 추진력을 이용해 균형을 잃고 바닥에 넘어뜨리는 훈련을 합니다. 전투에서 승리하기 위해 더 크거나 강할 필요는 없습니다.

우리 각자에게는 영적인 유도 경기장이 있습니다. 우리가 악을 피하고 진리를 배우며 선을 행하려고 노력하기 시작할 때 우리는 경기장에 들어서는 것입니다. 우리는 시합과 전투에 참여하게 됩니다.

우리는 상대방(거짓을 믿고 악한 것을 사랑하는 우리의 낡고 이기적인 마음/자기 자신)이 우리의 새로운 추진력을 이용해 우리를 균형을 잃고 넘어뜨리려고 할 것이라고 예상할 수 있습니다. 악을 한두 번 성공적으로 피하면 자기 축하라는 악에 빠지게 될 것입니다. 만약 우리가 흥미진진한 새로운 진리를 알게 된다면, 그것은 우리 자신의 지능에 대한 자부심에 더욱 빠져들게 할 것입니다. 몇 번 실패하면 절망에 빠지거나 프로젝트 전체를 포기하게 됩니다.

이러한 유도 전술을 예상할 수 있다면 균형을 유지하는 데 더 잘할 수 있을까요? 네, 물론이죠. 우리는 우리가 영적인 영역, 영적인 전투 또는 유혹에 처해 있다는 것을 인식할 수 있습니다. 우리는 말씀을 시금석으로 삼고, 우리가 사랑하고 신뢰하는 사람들로부터 조언과 지원을 받으면서 균형을 유지하려고 노력할 수 있습니다. 우리는 선한 일에 대한 새로운 사랑과 일치하는 진리를 배우면서 지나치지 않게 움직일 수 있습니다. 우리는 반복해서 연습하고 낙심하지 않을 수 있습니다.

유도는 성경에 언급되어 있지 않지만, 유도를 살펴보면 그 기술을 볼 수 있습니다:

구약성서에는 아론, 엘리, 사무엘과 같은 선한 대제사장이 악한 아들을 두었지만 그들을 통제하지 못한 이야기가 세 번 나옵니다. 처음에는 강하고 선한 노력이 부주의나 교만 또는 소홀한 연습으로 인해 균형을 잃게 됩니다. (참조 레위기 10:1-2, 1 사무엘 2:12-34, 그리고 1 사무엘 8:1-3)

이스라엘의 가장 유명한 세 왕인 사울, 다윗, 솔로몬은 모두 시작은 좋았지만 권력, 교만, 부의 유혹에 빠져 타락해 버립니다.

또 다른 사례로, 출애굽 당시 모세는 이스라엘 자손을 이끌고 이집트에서 가나안 땅으로 향했습니다. 그는 주님의 명령에 순종하며 잘 지내고 있었습니다. 하지만 메리바에서 그는 조급해져서 주님에 대한 신뢰를 잃고 스스로 문제를 해결하려고 합니다. 그 결과 그는 약속의 땅에 들어갈 수 없게 됩니다. (참조 민수기 20:6-13)

스웨덴보그의 저서 "새 예루살렘과 그 천국 교리"에는 유혹에 관한 장이 다음과 같은 섹션에서 시작됩니다. 196. 섹션에서 197 이 문장을 발견했습니다:

"유혹은 내적 또는 영적 인간과 외적 또는 자연적 인간 사이의 싸움입니다 ( 천국의 신비 2183, 4256)"

영적 성장을 시작하면 유도 경기장에 들어서는 것과 같습니다. 새롭게 형성되는 영적 자아는 습관적인 "자연적" 자아와 싸울 것입니다. 여러분은 균형을 유지하기 위해 싸우게 될 것이며, 영적인 싸움을 하고 있다는 사실을 계속 인식한다면 악과 거짓을 균형을 잃고 땅에 떨어뜨릴 수 있는 방법도 볼 수 있을 것입니다.

2183. 'He took butter and milk, and the young bull which he had made ready' means all those things so joined together. This becomes clear from the meaning of 'butter', 'milk', and 'the young bull', which are dealt with in the next paragraph. The subject in the verses previous to this has been the providing of the Lord's Rational with that which is celestial and that which is spiritual derived from this, meant by 'the meal of fine flour made into cakes', 2176, 2177, and also with the celestial-natural, meant by 'the young bull', 2180. The same things are now expressed by other words - by 'butter', 'milk', and 'a young bull', which mean all those same things when they have been joined together.

[2] But one is scarcely able to describe these matters to the ordinary mind because the majority do not know that every person possesses an internal, a rational, and a natural, and that these three are quite distinct and separate from one another, so distinct in fact that one can be at variance with another. That is to say, the rational, which is called the rational man, can be at variance with the natural, which is the natural man; indeed the rational man is able to see and perceive evil that is in the natural, and if it is a genuine rational, is able to correct it, see 1904. Before these two have been joined together man is unable to be whole or to experience the serenity of peace, since the one is in conflict with the other. For the angels present with a person govern his rational, while the evil spirits present with him govern his natural - and this gives rise to conflict.

[3] If in this conflict the rational prevails, the natural is placed in subjection, and the man is thus endowed with conscience; but if the natural prevails, he is not able to receive any conscience at all. If the rational prevails, his natural becomes as though it too was rational; but if the natural prevails, the rational becomes as though it too was natural. In addition, if the rational prevails, angels draw nearer to that person, implanting within him charity, a celestial quality which comes through the angels from the Lord; and at the same time the evil spirits move some distance away from him. But if the natural prevails, the angels move further away, that is, more towards his interiors, and the evil spirits draw nearer to the rational, constantly attack it, and fill the lower parts of his mind with forms of hatred, revenge, deceit, and the like. If the rational prevails, the man enters into the serenity of peace, and in the next life into the peace of heaven; but if the natural prevails, though during his lifetime he seems to experience serenity, he enters in the next life into the unrest and torment of hell.

[4] From these considerations one may know the nature of a person's state so far as his rational and so far as his natural are concerned. There is nothing else that can bring him blessing and happiness except the conformity of his natural to the rational when both are joined together. This is achieved solely by means of charity; and charity originates wholly in the Lord.

1904. That 'Sarai, Abram's wife, took' means the affection for truth, which in the genuine sense is 'Sarai the wife', is clear from the meaning of 'Sarai' as truth allied to good, and from the meaning of 'wife' as affection, dealt with already in 915, 1468. There are two affections, distinct and separate - the affection for good and the affection for truth. While a person is being regenerated the affection for truth takes the lead, for it is an affection for truth for the sake of good that moves him; but once he has been regenerated the affection for good takes the lead, and it is now an affection for truth originating in good that moves him. The affection for good belongs to the will, the affection for truth to the understanding. The most ancient people established a marriage so to speak between these two affections. They used to refer to good (or the love of good) and truth (or the love of truth) as Man, calling the former 'the husband' and the latter 'the wife'. The comparison of good and truth to a marriage has its origins in the heavenly marriage.

[2] Regarded in themselves good and truth do not possess any life, but they derive their life from love or affection. They are merely the instruments that serve life. Consequently as is the love producing the affection for good and truth, so is the life; for the whole of life constitutes the whole of love or affection. This is why 'Sarai his wife' in the genuine sense means the affection for truth. And because the Intellectual desired the Rational as its offspring, and because what she says is an expression of that desire or affection, this verse contains the explicit wording, 'Sarai, Abram's wife, gave to Abram her husband' which would be an unnecessary repetition - for in themselves these words would be quite superfluous - if such matters were not embodied within the internal sense.

[3] Intellectual truth is distinct and separate from rational truth, and rational truth from factual truth, just as what is internal, what is intermediate, and what is external are. Intellectual truth is internal, rational truth is intermediate, while factual truth is external. These are quite distinct and separate because one is interior to another. With everyone intellectual truth, which is internal, or that present within the inmost part of him, is not his own but is the Lord's with him. From this the Lord flows into the rational, where truth first appears as if it were the person's own, and through the rational into his faculty of knowing. From these considerations it is clear that nobody can possibly think as of himself from intellectual truth, but from rational truth and factual truth because these do appear as if they were his.

[4] Only the Lord, when He lived in the world, thought from intellectual truth, for that truth was His own Divine truth joined to good, or the Divine spiritual joined to the Divine celestial. In this respect the Lord was different from all others. Man in no way possesses the ability to think from the Divine existing within himself as his essential self, nor can that ability possibly exist within man, only within Him who was conceived from Jehovah. Because He thought from intellectual truth, that is, from the love or affection for intellectual truth, from that truth also He desired the Rational. This is why it is stated here that 'Sarai, Abram's wife', by whom is meant the affection for intellectual truth, 'took Hagar the Egyptian and gave her to Abram her husband as his wife (mulier)'.

[5] No other arcana concealed here can be brought out and explained intelligibly because the human being dwells in very great obscurity regarding his own internals. Indeed he has no conception of these, for he identifies the rational and the intellectual degrees of the mind with the factual degree, not knowing that these degrees are distinct and separate, so distinct in fact that the intellectual is able to exist without the rational, as also can the rational, while subordinate to the intellectual, exist without the factual. This must inevitably seem absurd to those wholly immersed in factual knowledge, but it is nevertheless the truth. It is not possible however for anyone to have truth present in the factual degree of his mind, that is to say, to have an affection for it and a belief in it, if truth is not present in the rational, into which and through which the Lord flows in from the intellectual degree. These arcana do not lie open to man's view except in the next life.