बाइबल

 

Sáng thế 40

पढाई करना

   

1 Mấy việc nầy qua rồi, xảy có quan tửu chánh và quan thượng thiện của vua Ê-díp-tô phạm đến chúa mình.

2 Pha-ra-ôn nổi giận cùng hai quan mình, là tửu chánh và thượng thiện,

3 bèn đem họ cần ngục tại dinh quan thị vệ, là nơi đương cầm Giô-sép.

4 Quan thị vệ cắt phần Giô-sép hầu việc hai quan đó; họ bị ngồi ngục một ít lâu.

5 Cùng trong một đêm, quan tửu chánh và quan thượng thiện của vua Ê-díp-tô đương bị cầm ngục, thấy một điềm chiêm bao, mỗi người một chiêm bao, và mỗi chiêm bao có ý nghĩa rõ ràng.

6 Sáng mai, Giô-sép đến cùng họ, nhìn thấy sắc buồn bực,

7 bèn hỏi rằng: Ngày nay sao hai quan có sắc mặt âu sầu vậy?

8 Ðáp rằng: Chúng tôi có thấy một điềm chiêm bao mà không ai bàn giùm. Giô-sép rằng: Sự bàn chiêm bao há chẳng do nơi Ðức Chúa Trời ư? Xin hãy thuật lại điềm chiêm bao của hai quan cho tôi nghe đi.

9 Quan tửu chánh thuật điềm chiêm bao mình lại cho Giô-sép mà rằng: Trong chiêm bao, tôi thấy một gốc nho ở trước mặt tôi;

10 gốc nho đó lại có ba nhành. Dường như thấy nhành nảy chồi, trổ bông, chùm có trái chín thì phải.

11 Tay tôi đương cầm cái chén của Pha-ra-ôn; tôi hái nho đó, ép nước nho vào, rồi dâng tửu bôi vào Tay Pha-ra-ôn.

12 Giô-sép nói: Ý-nghĩa chiêm bao đó là thể nầy: Ba nhành nho tức là ba ngày.

13 Trong ba ngày nữa, Pha-ra-ôn sẽ tha quan ra khỏi ngục, phục chức lại, quan sẽ dâng cái chén của Pha-ra-ôn vào tay người như cũ, như khi còn làm chức tửu chánh.

14 Song khi quan được hưởng lạc lại rồi, xin nhớ đến tôi, làm ơn tâu cùng Pha-ra-ôn về nổi tôi, và đem tôi ra khỏi chốn nầy.

15 Vì tôi bị người ta bắt đem ra khỏi xứ của người Hê-bơ-rơ, và tại đây tôi cũng chẳng có làm gì mà bị cầm nơi lao-lung nầy.

16 Quan thượng thiện thấy Giô-sép bàn mộng được tốt, bèn nói: Còn trong điềm chiêm bao của tôi đây, tôi đội ba giỏ bánh trắng trên đầu;

17 trong giỏ cao hơn hết, có đủ món thực vật của thợ làm bánh hấp cho Pha-ra-ôn; chim đáp vào giỏ trên đầu tôi ăn các món đó.

18 Giô-sép đáp rằng: Ý-nghĩa chiêm bao nầy là, ba giỏ, tức là ba ngày.

19 Trong ba ngày nữa, Pha-ra-ôn sẽ xử trảm quan, sai đem treo lên cây cho chim chóc ăn thịt quan vậy.

20 Ðến ngày thứ ba, là ngày sanh-nhựt của Pha-ra-ôn, người bèn bày tiệc đãi cả quần thần, và tha quan tửu chánh cùng quan thượng thiện ra khỏi ngục.

21 Pha-ra-ôn phục chức quan tửu chánh lại như xưa, đặng quan nầy dân tửu bôi vào tay mình;

22 nhưng lại hạ lịnh đem treo quan thượng thiện, y như lời Giô-sép đã bàn ra.

23 Ðoạn, quan tửu chánh chẳng còn nhớ đến Giô-sép nữa; quên người đi.

   

स्वीडनबॉर्ग के कार्यों से

 

Arcana Coelestia #5102

इस मार्ग का अध्ययन करें

  
/ 10837  
  

5102. 'Saying, Why are your faces sad today?' means, What affection gives rise to this sadness? This is clear from the meaning of 'faces' as the things that are within, dealt with in 358, 1999, 2434, 3527, 4066, 4796, 4797, and so as the affections, for a person's interiors from which his thoughts spring - which are also things that are within - are his affections; and being aspects of his love, these affections are essentially his life. It is well known that the affections reveal themselves in the faces of those who are in a state of innocence; and when those affections reveal themselves, so too does a general impression of their thoughts, for people's thoughts are the forms their affections take. Regarded in itself therefore the face is nothing else than an image representing the things that are within.

[2] No face is looked at by the angels in any other way, for angels do not see the material but the spiritual form that a person's face takes; that is, they see the form presented by his affections and the thoughts springing from those affections. These are the essential components of the human face, as anyone may recognize from the fact that when bereft of thought and affections the face is completely dead, and that the face is enlivened by them and owes its pleasing looks to them. The sadness expressing some affection, or an affection which gives rise to sadness, is meant by Joseph's words, Why are your faces sad today?

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

स्वीडनबॉर्ग के कार्यों से

 

Arcana Coelestia #1999

इस मार्ग का अध्ययन करें

  
/ 10837  
  

1999. That 'Abram fell on his face' 1 means adoration is clear without explanation. Falling on one's face' was the reverent way in which the Most Ancient Church, and as a consequence the ancients, expressed adoration. The reason they expressed it in this way was that 'the face' meant the inward parts, and 'falling on one's face' 1 represented a state of humiliation of those inward parts; and from this it became in the Jewish representative Church an act of reverence. True adoration or humility of heart entails prostration before the Lord face-downwards on the ground as the natural action resulting from it. Indeed humiliation of heart entails the acknowledgement of oneself as being nothing but uncleanness, and at the same time the acknowledgement of the Lord's infinite mercy towards such. When these acknowledgements are fixed in the mind, the mind itself casts itself down towards hell and prostrates the body. Nor does it raise itself until raised up by the Lord, as happens in all true humiliation, accompanied by a perception that such raising up is of the Lord's mercy. Such was the humiliation of members of the Most Ancient Church. It is different however with adoration which does not flow from humiliation of heart, see 1153.

[2] It is well known from the Word, in the Gospels, that the Lord adored and prayed to Jehovah, His Father, and that He did so as though to Someone other than Himself, even though Jehovah was within Him. But the state that the Lord experienced at such times was the state of His humiliation, the nature of which has been discussed in Volume One, namely this, that at such times as these He was in the infirm human derived from the mother. But to the extent He cast this off and took on the Divine His state was different, which state is called the state of His glorification. In the first state He adored Jehovah as Someone other than Himself, even though He was within Him, for, as has been stated, His Internal was Jehovah. In the latter state however, that is to say, the state of glorification, He spoke to Jehovah as to Himself, since He was Jehovah Himself.

[3] The truth of all this however cannot be grasped unless one knows what the internal is and how the internal operates into the external, and furthermore how the internal and external are distinct and separate and yet joined together. The matter may be illustrated however by means of something similar, namely by means of the internal with man and of its influx and operation into the external with him. For the fact that man has an internal, an interior or rational, and an external, see what has appeared already in 1889, 1940. Man's internal is that which makes him human and distinguishes him from animals. It is by means of this internal that man lives on after death and for ever, and by means of it the Lord can raise him up among angels. It is the prior or primary form from which anyone becomes and is a human being, and it is by means of this internal that the Lord is united to man. The heaven itself that is nearest to the Lord consists of these human internals, but being above even the inmost angelic heaven these internals therefore belong to the Lord Himself. In this way the entire human race is directly present beneath the eyes of the Lord. Distance, a visible feature of this sublunary world, does not exist in heaven, still less above heaven - see what has been mentioned from experience in 1275, 1277.

[4] These inward aspects of men possess no life in themselves but are recipient forms of the Lord's life. To the extent then that anyone is under the influence of evil, both that of his own doing and that which is hereditary, he has been so to speak separated from this internal which is the Lord's and resides with the Lord, and so has been separated from the Lord. For although that human internal is joined to the person and cannot be separated from him, yet to the extent he moves away from the Lord he does in a way separate himself from it, see 1594. But such separation is not a complete severance from that human internal - for if it were, man would no longer be able to live after death; but it is a lack of harmony and agreement with it on the part of his capacities which are beneath it, that is, of his rational and external man. Insofar as disharmony and disagreement are present there is no conjunction, but insofar as they are absent man is joined to the Lord by means of the internal, which is achieved in the measure that he is moved by love and charity, for love and charity effect conjunction. Such is the situation with man.

[5] But the Lord's Internal was Jehovah Himself, since He was conceived from Jehovah, who cannot be divided or become the relative of another, like a son who has been conceived from a human father. For unlike the human, the Divine is not capable of being divided but is and remains one and the same. To this Internal the Lord united the Human Essence. Moreover because the Lord's Internal was Jehovah it was not, like man's internal, a recipient form of life, but life itself. Through that union His Human Essence as well became life itself. Hence the Lord's frequent declaration that He is Life, as in John,

As the Father has Life in Himself, so He has granted the Son to have Life in Himself. John 5:26.

And elsewhere besides this in the same gospel, 1:4; 5:21; 6:33, 35, 48; 11:25. 'The Son' is used to mean the Lord's Human Essence. To the extent therefore that the Lord was in the human which He received by heredity from the mother, He appeared to be distinct and separate from Jehovah, and worshipped Jehovah as Someone other than Himself. But to the extent He cast off this human, the Lord was not distinct and separate from Jehovah but one with Him. The first state, as has been mentioned, was the state of the Lord's humiliation, but the second the state of His glorification.

फुटनोट:

1. lit faces

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.