圣经文本

 

創世記第27章

学习

   

1 以撒年老,眼睛昏花,不能見,就了他大兒子以掃來,:我兒。以掃:我在這裡。

2 :我如今老了,不知道一天死。

3 現在拿你的器械,就是箭囊和,往田野去為我打獵,

4 照我所的做成美味,拿給我,使我在未之先給你祝福

5 以撒對他兒子以掃說話,利百加也見了。以掃往田野去打獵,要得野味帶來

6 利百加就對他兒子雅各:我見你父親對你哥哥以掃

7 你去把野獸帶來,做成美味給我,我好在未死之先,在耶和華面前給你祝福

8 現在,我兒,你要照著我所吩咐你的,從我的話。

9 你到羊群裡去,給我拿兩隻肥山羊羔來,我便照你父親的給他做成美味。

10 你拿到你父親那裡給他,使他在未之先給你祝福

11 雅各對他母親利百加:我哥哥以掃渾身是有毛的,我身上是光滑的;

12 倘若我父親摸著我,必以我為欺哄人的,我就招咒詛,不得祝福。

13 母親對他:我兒,你招的咒詛歸到我身上;你只管我的話,去把羊羔給我拿來。

14 他便去拿來,交給他母親;他母親就照他父親的做成美味。

15 利百加又把家裡所存大兒子以掃上好的衣服給他小兒子雅各穿上,

16 又用山羊包在雅各的上和頸項的光滑處,

17 就把所做的美味和餅交在他兒子雅各裡。

18 雅各到他父親那裡:我父親!他:我在這裡。我兒,你是誰?

19 雅各對他父親:我是你的長子以掃;我已照你所吩咐我的行了。請起來坐著我的野味,好給我祝福

20 以撒對他兒子:我兒,你如何得這麼呢?他:因為耶和華─你的使我遇見好機會得著的。

21 以撒雅各:我兒,你前來,我摸摸你,知道你真是我的兒子以掃不是?

22 雅各就挨父親以撒以撒摸著他,:聲音是雅各的聲音,卻是以掃

23 以撒就辨不出他來;因為他上有毛,像他哥哥以掃一樣,就給他祝福

24 :你真是我兒子以掃麼?他:我是。

25 以撒:你遞給我,我好兒子的野味,給你祝福。雅各就遞給他,他便吃了,又拿酒給他,他也了。

26 父親以撒對他:我兒,你上前來與我親嘴。

27 他就上前與父親親嘴。他父親一衣服上的香氣,就給他祝福:我兒的香氣如同耶和華賜福之田地的香氣一樣。

28 賜你上的甘上的肥土,並許多五穀新酒

29 願多民事奉你,多國跪拜你。願你作你弟兄的主;你母親的兒子向你跪拜。凡咒詛你的,願他受咒詛;為你祝福的,願他蒙福。

30 以撒雅各祝福已畢,雅各從他父親那裡才出,他哥哥以掃正打獵回

31 也做了美味,拿來給他父親:請父親起來,兒子的野味,好給我祝福

32 父親以撒對他:你是誰?他:我是你的長子以掃

33 以撒地戰兢,:你未之先,是誰得了野味拿給我呢?我已經吃了,為他祝福;他將也必蒙福。

34 以掃了他父親,就放聲痛哭,:我父阿,求你也為我祝福

35 以撒:你兄弟已經用詭計將你的福分奪去了。

36 以掃:他名雅各,豈不是正對麼?因為他欺騙了我兩次:他從前奪了我長子的名分,你看,他現在又奪了我的福分。以掃又:你沒有留下為我可祝的福麼?

37 以撒回答以掃:我已立他為你的主,使他的弟兄都他作僕人,並賜他五穀新酒可以養生。我兒,現在我還能為你做甚麼呢?

38 以掃對他父親:父阿,你只有樣可祝的福麼?我父阿,求你也為我祝福以掃就放聲而哭。

39 父親以撒上的肥土必為你所上的甘必為你所得。

40 你必倚靠刀度日,又必事奉你的兄弟;到你強盛的時候,必從你頸項上掙開他的軛。

41 以掃因他父親雅各祝的福,就怨恨雅各:為我父親居喪的日子近了,到那時候,我要殺我的兄弟雅各

42 有人把利百加大兒子以掃告訴利百加,他就打發人去,了他小兒子雅各來,對他:你哥哥以掃想要殺你,報仇雪恨。

43 現在,我兒,你要我的話:起來,逃往哈蘭、我哥哥拉班那裡去,

44 同他些日子,直等你哥哥的怒氣消了。

45 哥哥向你消了怒氣,忘了你向他所做的事,我便打發人去把你從那裡帶回來。為甚麼日喪你們人呢?

46 利百加對以撒:我因這赫人的女子連性命都厭煩了;倘若雅各也娶赫人的女子為妻,像這些一樣,我活著還有甚麼益處呢?

   

来自斯威登堡的著作

 

Arcana Coelestia#3539

学习本章节

  
/10837  
  

3539. 'And put them on Jacob her younger son' means the affection for truth, that is, the life of good originating in truth. This is clear from the representation of 'Rebekah' as the Divine Truth of the Divine Rational, from the representation of 'Jacob' as the Divine Truth of the Divine Natural, and from the meaning here of 'putting on' as the communication, also the learning, of something, namely truths that clothe good, meant by 'Esau's clothes', 3537, accordingly the affection for natural truth, which affection is at this point the same as the life of good originating in truth. How these matters are to be understood may be known from what has been stated above in 3518. Yet because they are such as are completely unknown at the present day, let some explanation enabling them to be grasped be given. The subject in this chapter [in the highest sense] is the Lord and how He made His Natural Divine, and in the representative sense man's regeneration as regards his natural, see 3490.

[2] In the case of man the situation is as follows: The end in view of regeneration is that a person may be made new as regards his internal man, and so as regards the soul or spirit. But he is unable to be made new or be regenerated as regards that internal man without also being made new as regards the external man. For although a person becomes a spirit after death he nevertheless takes with him into the next life those things that belong to his external man, namely natural affections, also matters of doctrine, as well as factual knowledge; in short he takes with him everything belonging to the exterior or natural memory, see 2475-2483. Indeed these things form the groundwork on which his interiors ultimately rest. The disposition of those exterior things therefore determines what the interior become when these latter enter into the former, for within those exterior things they undergo modification. From this it is evident that a person has to be regenerated or made new not only as regards the internal or rational man but also as regards the external or natural man. Except for this there would not be any correspondence. Regarding the correspondence that exists between the internal man and the spiritual things belonging to the internal man with the external man and the natural things belonging to the external man, see 2987, 2989-2991, 3002, 3493.

[3] The state of man's regeneration is described in the representative sense in this chapter as Esau and Jacob. At this point the nature of the first stage of that state is described, that is to say, when a person is being regenerated or before he has become regenerated. In fact this state is the complete reverse of the state in which a person has become regenerate. Indeed in the former state, that is to say, when a person is being regenerated or before he has become regenerated, things of the understanding, which are those of truth, seemingly take the lead; but once he has become regenerate those of the will, which are those of good, do so. The fact that things of the understanding or of truth seemingly take the lead in the first state was represented by Jacob claiming for himself Esau's birthright - see 3325, 3336 - and then claiming his blessing, the subject under discussion here. And the fact that the state is the complete reverse of the regenerate state is represented by Jacob's impersonating Esau, that is to say, being dressed in Esau's clothes and with the skins of the kids of the she-goats. Indeed in this state rational truth has not yet been so joined to rational good, or what amounts to the same, the understanding has not been so joined to the will, as to flow and act into the natural and set in order the things that are so reversed there.

[4] This also becomes clear from much experience, in particular from this. A person is able to discern in his understanding, and from this the natural is able to know many things that are good and true, but the will is unable as yet to act in accordance with those things. Take for example the truth that love and charity are the essential thing with a human being. He is able to see and confirm this in his understanding, but until he has been regenerated he is unable to acknowledge it in his will. There are also people totally lacking in love to the Lord and in charity towards the neighbour who can well grasp this truth. The same applies to the truth that love is the very life of man, and that the nature of his life is determined by that of his love; also the truth that all delight and all pleasantness stem from love, as do all gladness and all happiness, where again the nature of the love determines that of the gladness and the happiness. A person is also able to grasp in his understanding, even though the will disagrees with it or even opposes it, the truth that the happiest life originates in love to the Lord and love towards the neighbour because the Divine itself is flowing into that life, and conversely that the unhappiest life originates in self-love and love of the world because hell is flowing into that life.

[5] Consequently the understanding, but not the will, is able to perceive the truth that love to the Lord is the life of heaven, and that mutual love is the soul from that life. In the measure therefore that a person does not think from the life of his [unregenerate] will, and does not reflect on his own life from there, he perceives that truth in his understanding; but in the measure that he does think from the life of his [unregenerate] will he does not perceive it, indeed he refuses to believe it. It may also be perfectly clear to a person in his understanding that it is into humility, if it exists in him, that the Divine is able to enter, because in that state of humility self-love and love of the world, and therefore hellish things which stand in the way, are removed. But as long as his will is not a new will, and his understanding is not united to this, no humility of heart can exist in a person. Indeed, in the measure that a person leads an evil life, that is, in the measure that his will is bent on evil, such humility cannot be there in him, and also the truth spoken of above is unclear to him and he refuses to believe it. Therefore a person may also be able to perceive in his understanding that when humility is present in someone it is not there for the sake of a love of glory in the Lord but for the sake of Divine Love, in which case the Lord is able to enter in with goodness and truth and bring blessing and happiness to that person. But to the extent that the will is consulted, this truth is obscured. And the same is so with very many other circumstances.

[6] This ability of being able to understand what good and truth is even though he does not will it has been conferred on man to enable him to be reformed and regenerated. For this reason this ability exists with evil and good alike; indeed the ability is sometimes keener with the evil. But there is this difference - with the evil no affection for truth exists for the sake of life, that is, for the sake of the good of life which originates in truth, and so they are not capable of being reformed. But with the good there does exist the affection for truth for the sake of life, that is, for the sake of the good of life, and so they are capable of being reformed. The first state in the reformation of the latter however is a state in which truth taught by doctrine seems to them to be primary, and the good of life secondary, since truth is the source of their good actions. But their second state is a state in which the good of life is primary and truth taught by doctrine secondary, since good, that is, the will for good, is the source of their good actions. And when this is the case, because the will is joined to the understanding as in a marriage, the person is regenerate. These two states are the subject in the internal sense in these incidents involving Esau and Jacob.

  
/10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.