The Bible

 

Genesis 27

Study

   

2 Iṇṇ'as Isxaq: «Nak əmərədda waššara, wər əṣṣena da daɣ-i təlla taṃattant.

3 Daɣ adi əmərədda əgmaya daɣ-ak ad tətkəla təganzay nnak əd ṃarran-net təggəzaɣ əṣuf tanɣaɣ i du iṣan ən tawaqqast.

4 Tassaŋŋaɣ i aṃensay izodan s əmmək wa as tareɣ tawəyaɣ i t'id at t'atša fəl a fall- ak ag'albaraka nin dat taṃattant in.»

5 Wa iššewal Isxaq y Esaw təṣṣisam asan Raqqiyetu. Igla Esaw, ikka tagmərt.

6 Təṇṇa i rures Yaqub: «Əmərədda ad əsleɣ y abba nnak iššewal y amaqqar nak Esaw, iṇṇ'as:

7 "Awəy i du iṣan ən tawaqqast tagaɣ i aṃensay izodan az z'atša a fall-ak ag'albaraka nin dat Əməli harwa di wər aba"

8 Daɣ adi əmərədda barar in ṣəsəm i tagaɣ a w'as kay omara.

9 A daɣ-ak areɣ at tagla takka eharay wa ənḍərran tabəza du əššin sagayan fəl a daɣ-san akna ameṇsay izodan y abba nnak s əmmək w'as t'ira.

10 Aṃaran tawəyaɣ as tu atš'ay fəl a fall-ak ag'albaraka-net dat taṃattant-net.»

11 Mišan Yaqub iṇṇa y anna-net Raqqiyetu: «Nak əṣṣanaɣ as amaqqar in Esaw ibəndəlan, nak abo.

12 As di iḍas abba nin, iṣṣan as bahu a das əge, a di abəz daɣ təkaddilt issəwər i allaɣanat daɣ adag n albaraka nnet».

13 «Təwəret i allaɣanat», təṇṇ'as ṃas. «Səsəm i ɣas aglu, ag'awa as dak əṇṇeɣ.»

14 Igla ilway tan du y anna-net təkna daɣ san ameṇsay wa izodan əmmək w'as t'ira abba nnet.

15 Dəffər adi tədkal du Raqqiyetu isəlsa n Esaw win əhossaynen as kala da əhan ehan-net təssəls'en i Yaqub wa n amaḍray nnet.

16 Təssəlsa tawšeten-net d iri-net agašek ən sagayan.

17 Dəffər a wen təkfa Yaqub ameṇsay wa izodan əd təgəlla a du təkna da.

18 Eway tan y abba-net issəslam fall as. Ibaz as tu Isxaq iṇṇ'as: «Ma təṃosa daɣ bararan in?»

19 Iṇṇ'as Yaqub: «nak Esaw, wa n aɣafadday nnak. Əgeɣ aw'as di təṇṇeɣ. Əgmaya daɣ ak a du taqqama, tatša awa d əgrawa daɣ təgmərt in fəl a fall-i tag' albaraka nnak.»

20 Iṇṇ'as Isxaq: «Ma təge as du təgrawa awaqqas s ətrub?» Ijjəwwab iṇṇ'as: «Əməli Məššina nnak a di dər əs isaṃṃanayan.»

21 Iṇṇa Iškaq i Yaqub: «Ihaz i du barar in a kay əḍəsa ad əṣṣəna kud tidət as kay Esaw.

22 Ihoz t'idu, isallamamas tu iṇṇa: «əməsli in Yaqub mišan ifassan in Esaw».

23 Ig̣mad as tazdit fəlas ifassan-net əlsan tan aṇzadan šilat ən win Esaw. Isammatag'as, inniyat du a fall-as ag'albaraka nnet

24 mišan ilas tu əṣəstan: «Tidət da as kay Esaw?» Ijjəwwab as Yaqub: «Awalla»

25 Iṇṇ'as aṃaran: «Awəy du sər-i a wa du tənɣe daɣ təgmərt fəl ad tatša aga fall-ak albaraka nin.» Eway as du Yaqub ameṇsay, itš-ay, ikf-ay du esmad išw-ay.

26 Dəffər a di iṇṇ-as Isxaq: «Ihaz i du, təzələmmeɣ i barar in.»

27 Ihoz t id izalammat tu təzzar iwat Isxaq aḍu ən səlsa win izlag, iga fall-as albaraka s as iṇṇa: «Hay aḍu ən barar in ola d aḍu n səgyakan win daɣ igar Əməli albarakatan

28 Akfet kay Məššina ikonakan agu iṃədlan nak kul idəɣran akf ik tilwat n alkamatan d esmad təleq qu w'aynayan

29 Šimattiwen kul dak ikkəwanan Iɣərfan deɣ dak əssəjədan Iməḍrayan nak daw-ək ərəsan Ayt mak kul dak əssəjədan Ilɣan Əməli i kay imənzaɣan Itəwəbərrək i kay ibərrakan.

30 Zama ad iɣrad Isxaq tehakkay ən Yaqub albaraka-net iqqab, oṣa ddu Esaw wa n amaqqar-net ifal du tagmərt.

31 Ikna ddu əntada ameṇsay wa izodan eway tu y abba-net iṇṇ'as: «Qam abba nin tatša awa dd'ig̣madan tagmərt in, fəl a fall-i tag'albaraka nnak».

32 «Ma təṃosa?» iṣəstan t'Isxaq, abba nnet. «Nak Esaw wa n aɣafadday nnak.»

33 Irmaɣ Isxaq har iqqim issiwal əs taysəst, iṇṇa: «Ma iṃos za wa dd'inɣan awaqqas eway i t'id ətšeq qu dat aṣṣa nnak. Əgeɣ fall-as albaraka, əmərədda iwar tu.

34 As isla Esaw y awalan n abba-net ig̣mad tu əməsli labasan iḍnay atkər, ad itigunun abba nnet: «Səwər i albaraka nnak nak da, abba nin.»

35 Mišan iṇṇ'as Isxaq: «Amaḍray nnak a di ikkərrasan təzzar idkal albaraka nnak.»

36 Iṇṇ-as Esaw: «Adi da fəl iga eṣəm Yaqub ṣanatat təkkərrəs a di iga: əstizarat idkal fall-i alxaq wa n təla nin fall-as temsay dəffər adi idkal fall-i albaraka nnak.» Iṇṇ'as harwa: «Wər di təṣsənsa albaraka iyyan?»

37 Iṇṇ'as: «Əmərədda əgeq qu məšš-ik,əgeq qu məššis ən šəqqaɣan-net, əššilwaq qu s alkama d asmad w'aynayan. Daɣ adi mas tareɣ a dak k aga barar in?»

38 Iṇṇ'as Esaw: «Wər təleɣ ar albaraka iyyanda, abba? Səwər i tu nak da, abba nin.» Iḍbaɣ as ətkər.

39 Təzzar iṇṇ'as abba-net Isxaq: «Təməɣsurt nak akal wa n maṇṇa, Ikonakan dər-san təneməggəga.

40 Təməddurt nak takoba əd ṭarna. Əššəɣəl n amaḍray nnak kul tu takna Har taffalaga y a tu tarna Tasaddarfa iṃan-nak tala tat tarza.»

41 Igzar Esaw Yaqub fəl əddəlil n albaraka wa fall-as ig'abba nnet. Iṇṇa daɣ ṃan-net: «Daɣ a ihozan abba nnana ad t iba. Dəffər awen ad əfrəga ad anɣa Yaqub.

42 Təsla Raqqiyetu gezzar n Esaw Yaqub. Təssassaɣr'ay du, təṇṇ'as: «Amaqqar nak Esaw ira a daɣ-ak izzəzəl, s a kay anɣu.

43 Əmərədda barar in ṣəsəm i: «Taggar əs Xaran ɣur amaqqar in Laban.

44 Agu ɣur-əs tamert har tiṣmad taɣašašit n amaqqar nak,

45 har t'ig̣məd alham nak, aṭṭaw in a wa das təɣšada. Əddi a din assagla awedan dər-ək d'iglan. Fəlas wər areɣ a di tagim ag̣amad iyyanda ket-nawan fəl əššin-ewwan.

46 Təṇṇa y Isxaq wər əṃṃəndaya təməddurt fəl əddəlil ən təḍoden šinn aššet Xet. Ma əkkeɣ i təməddurt izlaf Yaqub iyyat daɣ Kəl Xet šilat ən šin, daɣ akal a.

   

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #3623

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

3623. Wherefore have I lives? That this signifies that thus there would not be conjunction, is evident from the signification of “lives,” as being conjunction through truths and goods; for when no truth from a common stock or genuine source could be adjoined to natural truth, then neither would there be the adjunction of the natural to the truth of the rational; thus to the rational its life would appear as no life (n. 3493, 3620); hence by the words, “wherefore have I lives?” is signified that thus there would not be conjunction. The reason why here and in other passages lives are spoken of in the plural, is that there are two faculties of life in man; one of which is called the understanding, and is of truth; and the other of which is called the will, and is of good; these two lives or faculties of life make a one when the understanding is of the will, or what is the same, when truth is of good. This is the reason why in the Hebrew tongue frequent mention is made of “life,” and also of “lives.” That mention is made of “lives,” is evident from the following passages in Genesis:

And Jehovah God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of lives, and man became a living soul (Genesis 2:7).

And out of the ground made Jehovah God to grow every tree that is desirable to the sight, and good for food; and the tree of lives in the midst of the garden (Genesis 2:9).

Behold I do bring the flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh wherein is the breath of lives (Genesis 6:17).

And they went in unto Noah into the ark, two, two, of all flesh wherein is the breath of lives (Genesis 7:15, n. 780).

All in whose nostrils was the breathing of the breath of lives died (Genesis 6:22).

And in David:

I believe to see the goodness of Jehovah in the land of lives (Psalms 27:13).

Again:

What man is he that desireth lives, and loveth days that he may see good (Psalms 34:12)?

Again:

With Thee is the fountain of lives; in Thy light shall we see light (Psalms 36:9).

In Malachi:

My covenant was with Leviticus of lives and peace (Malachi 2:5).

In Jeremiah:

Thus saith Jehovah, Behold I set before you the way of lives, and the way of death (Jeremiah 21:8).

In Moses:

To love Jehovah thy God, and to obey His voice, and to cleave unto Him for He Is thy lives, and the length of thy days; that thou mayest dwell in the land (Deuteronomy 30:20).

And again:

It is not a vain word from you, because it is your lives, and through this word ye shall prolong your days upon the land (Deuteronomy 32:47); and in other places.

“Lives” are spoken of in the plural because they are two, as was said, and yet a one; as also in the Hebrew tongue are “heavens,” which are many, and yet a one; in like manner “waters,” those above and those beneath (Genesis 1:6-7, 9), which are spiritual things pertaining to the rational and the natural, and which also are to be a one through conjunction. In respect to “lives,” they signify in the plural both what is of the will and what is of the understanding, consequently what is of good and what is of truth; for the life of man is nothing else than good and truth wherein is life from the Lord, inasmuch as man, without good and truth, and life therein, is no man; for man without these would not be able to will anything or think anything, all his faculty of willing being from what is good or what is not good, and his faculty of thinking from what is true or what is not true; hence man has lives, which are one life when his thinking is from his willing, that is, when the truth which is of faith is from the good which is of love.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.