The Bible

 

Genesis 21

Study

   

3 Ig'Ibrahim i rur-es wa igraw əd Sarata da eṣəm Isxaq.

4 Isammaṇkad-tu əzəl wa d-iga əṭṭam aḍan əd təhut, təməwit t'as t'omar Məššina.

5 Iga Ibrahim ɣur təhut n Isxaq temeḍay n awatay.

6 Təṇṇa Sarata: «Məššina isisag-i taḍaza ən tədəwit. Aytedan kul win əslanen Isxaq ad-agin taḍaza ta əgeɣ.»

7 Təlas təṇṇa: «Ma iṃos wa z-issuḍəfan Ibrahim as Sarata ilkam daɣ-as əsəṇkəs ən bararan? Ənta əkfeq-qu barar daɣ tušaray-nnet.»

8 Idwal barar. Əzəl w'ad təmməzay Sarata d əsəṇkəs-net ig'Ibrahim ṣaksas zəwwəran ən tədəwit.

9 Tənay Sarata barar ən wələt Maṣar ta təgat Hajara, wa təla d Ibrahim, itajab daɣ barar-net Isxaq.

10 Təṇṇa y Ibrahim: «Əstəɣ taklit a da ənta əd rur-es. Wa da, wər z-inəməkusət əd barar-in Isxaq»

11 Awalan win əkman Ibrahim wəllen fəlas Ismaɣil ənta da rur-es.

12 Mišan iṇṇ-as Məššina: «A-kay-wər-takmu batu ən barar əd tawahayt-nak. Ardu s igi n a w'as dak təṇṇa Sarata. Id fəlas aganna wa n Isxaq a daɣ z-agu əzzurriya-nnak.

13 Amaran barar wa n tawahayt ad-iqqəl amaraw ən tamattay iyyat, id ənta da rur-ek.»

14 Aɣóra ṭufat inzay Ibrahim daɣ adakal ən təgəlla d əṇwar iḍnayan aṃan, ikf-en i Hajara, issəwar-tan əzir-net, ikf-et barar, issəgl-et. Təgla, teway əd taṇeray ən Ber-Šeba, təxrak.

15 As əɣradan aṃan daɣ əṇwar, toyya-ddu rur-es daw təfsəq.

16 Təzzar təkk-as əḍḍəkud ən taggor təqqim fəl-as təṇṇa: «Wər areɣ ad haṇṇaya barar-in itiba-tu.» Təqqim-in sen da ad təhallu.

17 Məššina isla i tala ən barar təzzar iɣra-ddu Angalos ən Məššina daɣ jənnawan Hajara iṣṣəstan-tat: «Ma kam igrawan, Hajara? Ad wər tərməɣa. Məššina isla i barar ihallu daɣ adag wa daq-q in toyye.

18 Əbdəd! Ədkəl barar-nam, əṣṣən daɣ-as, id ad-t-aga əmaraw ən tamattay tagget.

19 Olam Məššina šiṭṭawen ən Hajara təzzar togg'aṇu. Təgla təḍnay aṇwar təššəšwa barar-net. Daɣ təɣlift ən Məššina idwal barar, iqqal ənaṇḍab ən təganzay isaḍasan. Iɣsar daɣ taṇeray ən Faran. Təzzəzlaf-tu ṃa-s wələt Maṣar.

22 Daɣ azzaman win di Abimelek oṣa-ddu Ibrahim, iddew əd Fikol əmənokal ən nammagaran-net. Iṇṇa Abimelek y Ibrahim: «Məššina og̣az kay daɣ a wa tətagga kul.

23 Əmərədda əhəḍ-i əs Məššina as wər di-za-takkaddala nak wala bararan-in wala əzzurriya-nnin. Əmmək w'as dak-əmmozala s əlləllu, mazal-i sər-əs, nak d akal a daɣ təɣsara.»

24 «Əhaḍa sər-əs» iṇṇa Ibrahim.

25 Mišan išaššawad Ibrahim Abimelek təṇṇa ta təgat daɣ batu n aṇu wa əgdalan eklan-net.

26 Ijjəwwab-as Abimelek: «Wər əṣṣena wa igan a di. Kay iṃan-nak wər di-təṇṇeɣ araṭ, amaran wər əsleɣ i sər-əs immigradan har azalada.»

27 Idkal Ibrahim eharay wa ənḍərran əd šitan ikf-en y Abimelek, əsammarkaṣan taṣṣaq gar-essan.

28 Iṣkat Ibrahim šibəgag əṣṣayat daɣ aharay-nnet.

29 «Ma fəl ənṣanat, iṇṇ-as Abimelek, əṣṣayat təbəgag šin təṣkata da?»

30 «Əṣṣayat təbəgag a da a tanat təqbəla əg̣mədnat-in əfuṣ-in, əṃosnat təgəyya n as nak a iɣazan aṇu a da.»

31 A di da a fəl ig'adagg a da eṣəm Ber-Šeba: anu wa fəl əhaḍan ket-nasan.

32 Dəffər as saṃṃarkasan taṣṣaq daɣ Ber-Šeba iqqal Abimelek akal ən Kəl Filist, ənta əd Fikol wa n əmənokal ən nammagaran-net.

33 Ibrahim iṇbal ašək igan eṣəm ešel daɣ Ber-Šeba, amaran iɣbad Əməli, Məššina Amaɣlol daɣ adag wen.

34 Igla Ibrahim iɣsar daɣ akal ən Kəl Filist har iga tamert.

   

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #2715

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

2715. There are two arcana here, one, that the good of the spiritual man is comparatively obscure; and the other, that this obscurity is illuminated by the Lord’s Divine Human. As regards the first, that good with the spiritual man is comparatively obscure, this is evident from what was said above concerning the state of the spiritual man in comparison with the state of the celestial man (n. 2708); for by comparing these states the fact becomes manifest. With the celestial, good itself is implanted in their will part, and light comes therefrom into their intellectual part; but with the spiritual all the will part has been destroyed, so that they have nothing of good from it; and therefore good is implanted by the Lord in their intellectual part (see n. 863, 875, 895, 927, 928, 1023, 1043, 1044, 2124, 2256). The will part is what chiefly lives in man, while the intellectual lives from it. As therefore the will part has been so destroyed with the spiritual man as to be nothing but evil, and yet evil flows in from it perpetually and continually into his intellectual part, that is, into his thought, it is evident that the good there is comparatively obscured.

[2] Hence it is that the spiritual have not love to the Lord, as have the celestial, and consequently they have not the humiliation which is essential in all worship, and by means of which good can flow in from the Lord; for an elated heart does not receive at all, but a humble heart. Neither have the spiritual love toward the neighbor, as the celestial have for the love of self and the world continually flows in from their will part, and obscures the good of that love; as must also be evident to everyone if he reflects, by considering that when he does good to anyone it is for the sake of an end in the world; and that therefore, although he is not doing so consciously, still he is thinking of a recompense, either from those to whom he does good, or from the Lord in the other life; thus that his good is defiled by the idea of merit, as also by considering that when he has done any good, if he can make it known and thus set himself above others, he is in the delight of his life. But the celestial love the neighbor more than themselves; nor do they think at all of recompense, nor in any manner set themselves up above others.

[3] Moreover, the good that is with the spiritual has been obscured by persuasions from various principles arising also from the love of self and of the world. The quality of their persuasion even of faith may be seen above (n. 2682, 2689 the end); this likewise is from the influx of evil from their will part.

[4] Moreover that the good with the spiritual man is obscure in comparison, is evident from the fact that he does not know what is true from any perception, as the celestial do, but from instruction from parents and masters, and also from the doctrine into which he was born; and when he superadds anything from himself and from his thought, then for the most part the sensuous and its fallacies, and the rational and its appearances, prevail, and cause him to be scarcely able to acknowledge any pure truth, such as the celestial acknowledge. Nevertheless in those seeming truths the Lord implants good, even if the truths are fallacious, or appearances of truth; but the good becomes obscure from them, being qualified by the truths with which it is conjoined. The case with this is as with the light of the sun flowing into objects. The quality of the objects which receive it causes the light to appear there under the aspect of color, beautiful if the quality of the form and of the reception is becoming and correspondent, but unbeautiful if the quality of the form and of the reception is not becoming, and thus not correspondent. In this manner the good itself is qualified according to the truth.

[5] The same is also manifest from the fact that the spiritual man does not know what evil is. He scarcely believes any other things to be evil than those which are contrary to the precepts of the Decalogue, and is not aware of the evils of affection and thought, which are innumerable; nor does he reflect upon them, nor call them evils. All delights whatever of cupidities and pleasures he regards no otherwise than as good; and the very delights of the love of self he both seeks after, and approves, and excuses, being ignorant that such things affect his spirit, and that he becomes altogether such in the other life.

[6] From this it is in like manner evident that though scarcely anything else is treated of in the whole Word than the good of love to the Lord and of love toward the neighbor, still the spiritual man does not know that good is the essential of faith, nor even what love and charity are in their essence; and that as to what he has learned of faith, which he makes essential, he nevertheless discusses whether it be so, unless he has been confirmed by much experience of life. This the celestial never do, for they know and perceive that it is so. Hence it is said by the Lord in Matthew:

Let your speech be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay; what is more than these is of evil (Matthew 5:37).

For the celestial are in the truth itself respecting which the spiritual dispute whether it be so; hence, as the celestial are in the truth itself, they can see from it endless things which belong to that truth, and thus from light see as it were the whole heaven. But as the spiritual dispute whether it be so, they cannot, so long as they do this, come to the first boundary of the light of the celestial, still less look at anything from their light.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.