The Bible

 

창세기 25

Study

   

1 아브라함이 후처를 취하였으니 그 이름은 그두라라

2 그가 시므란과, 욕산과, 므단과, 미디안과, 이스박과, 수아을 낳았고

3 욕산과, 스바와, 드단을 낳았으며 드단의 자손은 앗수르 족속과, 르두시 족속과, 르움미 족속이며

4 미디안의 아들은 에바와, 에벨과, 하녹과, 아비다와, 엘다아니 다 그두라의 자손이었더라

5 아브라함이 이삭에게 자기 모든 소유를 주었고

6 자기 서자들에게도 재물을 주어 자기 생전에 그들로 자기 아들 이삭을 떠나 동방 곧 동국으로 가게 하였더라

7 아브라함의 향년이 일백 칠십 오세라

8 그가 수가 높고 나이 많아 기운이 진하여 죽어 자기 열조에게로 돌아가매

9 그 아들 이삭과 이스마엘이 그를 마므레 앞 헷 족속 소할의 아들 에브론의 밭에 있는 막벨라 굴에 장사하였으니

10 이것은 아브라함이 헷 족속에게서 산 밭이라 아브라함과 그 아내 사라가 거기 장사되니라

11 아브라함이 죽은 후에 하나님이 그 아들 이삭에게 복을 주셨고 이삭을 브엘 라해로이 근처에 거하였더라

12 사라의 여종 애굽인 하갈이 아브라함에게 낳은 아들 이스마엘의 후예는 이러하고

13 이스마엘의 아들들의 이름은 그 이름과 그 세대 대로 이와 같으니라 이스마엘의 장자는 느바욧이요, 그 다음은 게달과, 앗브엘과, 밉삼과,

14 미스마와, 두마와, 맛사와,

15 하닷과, 데마와, 여둘과, 나비스와, 게드마니

16 이들은 이스마엘의 아들들이요 그 촌과 부락대로 된 이름이며 그 족속대로는 십 이방백이었더라

17 이스마엘은 향년이 일백 삼십 칠세에 기운이 진하여 죽어 자기 열조에게로 돌아갔고

18 그 자손들은 하윌라에서부터 앗수르로 통하는 애굽 앞 술까지 이르러 그 모든 형제의 맞은편에 거하였더라

19 아브라함의 아들 이삭의 후예는 이러하니라 아브라함이 이삭을 낳았고

20 이삭은 사십세에 리브가를 취하여 아내를 삼았으니 리브가는 밧단 아람의 아람 족속 중 브두엘의 딸이요 아람 족속 중 라반의 누이였더라

21 이삭이 그 아내가 잉태하지 못하므로 그를 위하여 여호와께 간구하매 여호와께서 그 간구를 들으셨으므로 그 아내 리브가가 잉태하였더니

22 아이들이 그의 태 속에서 서로 싸우는지라 그가 가로되 `이같으면 내가 어찌할꼬 ?' 하고 가서 여호와께 묻자온대

23 여호와께서 그에게 이르시되 두 국민이 네 태 중에 있구나 두 민족이 네 복 중에서부터 나누이리라 이 족속이, 저 족속보다 강하겠고 큰 자는 어린 자를 섬기리라 하셨더라

24 그 해산 기한이 찬즉 태에 쌍동이가 있었는데

25 먼저 나온 자는 붉고 전신이 갖옷 같아서 이름을 에서라 하였고

26 후에 나온 아우는 손으로 에서의 발꿈치를 잡았으므로 그 이름을 야곱이라 하였으며 리브가가 그들을 낳을 때에 이삭이 육십세이었더라

27 그 아이들이 장성하매 에서는 익숙한 사냥군인고로 들 사람이 되고 야곱은 종용한 사람인고로 장막에 거하니

28 이삭은 에서의 사냥한 고기를 좋아하므로 그를 사랑하고 리브가는 야곱을 사랑하였더라

29 야곱이 죽을 쑤었더니 에서가 들에서부터 돌아와서 심히 곤비하여

30 야곱에게 이르되 `내가 곤비하니 그 붉은 것을 나로 먹게 하라' 한지라 그러므로 에서의 별명은 에돔이더라

31 야곱이 가로되 `형의 장자의 명분을 오늘날 내게 팔라'

32 에서가 가로되 `내가 죽게 되었으니 이 장자의 명분이 내게 무엇이 유익하리요'

33 야곱이 가로되 `오늘 내게 맹세하라' 에서가 맹세하고 장자의 명분을 야곱에게 판지라

34 야곱이 떡과 팥죽을 에서에게 주매 에서가 먹으며 마시고 일어나서 갔으니 에서가 장자의 명분을 경홀히 여김이었더라

   

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #4292

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

4292. In the internal historical sense by “he said, Thy name shall no more be called Jacob, but Israel,” is signified that they could not represent as Jacob, but as from a new quality given them. This may be seen from the meaning of “Jacob” in the Word, as being his posterity (see n. 4281); and from the signification of a “name,” as being quality (s ee just above, n. 4291). The new quality itself is “Israel” in the internal sense; for “Israel” is the celestial spiritual, thus the internal man (n. 4286). And because “Israel” is the celestial spiritual and thus the internal man, “Israel” is also the internal spiritual church; for whether you speak of the spiritual man or the spiritual church, it is the same thing; because the spiritual man is a church in particular, and a number are a church in general. If a man were not a church in particular, there would not be any church in general. A congregation in general is what in common speech is called a church, but in order that there may be any church, everyone in this congregation must be such as is the church in general, because every general involves parts similar to itself.

[2] As regards the matter itself (that they could not represent as Jacob, but as from a new quality given them, which is “Israel”) the case is this. It was specifically Jacob’s posterity who represented the church, but not Isaac’s specifically; for Isaac’s posterity were not from Jacob only, but also from Esau. Still less was it Abraham’s posterity specifically; for Abraham’s posterity were not from Jacob only, but also from Esau, and likewise from Ishmael, as also from his sons by his second wife Keturah—thus from Zimran, Jokshan, Medan, Midian, Ishbak, and Shuah, and their sons (see Genesis 25:1-4). Now as Jacob’s posterity insisted on being representative (as shown just above n. 4290), they could not represent as Jacob, nor as Isaac, nor as Abraham. That they could not as Jacob was because Jacob represented the external of the church, but not its internal; and they could not as Isaac at the same time, nor as Abraham at the same time, for the reason just adduced.

[3] There was therefore no other way by which they could represent the church than by a new name being given to Jacob, and thereby a new quality; which new quality should signify the internal spiritual man, or what is the same, the internal spiritual church. This new quality is “Israel.” Every church of the Lord is internal and external, as has been repeatedly shown. The internal church is what is represented, and the external is what represents. Moreover the internal church is either spiritual or celestial. The internal spiritual church was represented by Israel, and the internal celestial church was afterwards represented by Judah. Therefore also a division was made, and the Israelites were a kingdom by themselves, and the Jews were a kingdom by themselves; but on this subject of the Lord’s Divine mercy hereafter. Hence it is evident that Jacob (that is, the posterity of Jacob) could not represent a church as Jacob, for this would be to represent only the external of a church; but must also do so as Israel, because “Israel” is the internal.

[4] That the internal is what is represented, and the external what represents, has been shown before, and may likewise be seen from man himself. Man’s speech represents his thought, and his action represents his will. Speech and action are man’s externals, and thought and will are his internals. Furthermore, man’s face itself, by its varying looks, represents both his thought and his will. That the face by its looks represents, is known to everyone; for with the sincere their interior states may be seen from the looks of the face. In a word, all things of the body represent what is of the animus and of the mind.

[5] The case is similar with the externals of the church, for these are like a body, and the internals are like a soul—as the altars and the sacrifices upon them, which as is known were external things; in like manner the showbreads; also the lampstand with its lights; and likewise the perpetual fire: that these represented internal things may be known to everyone; and it is the same with the rest of the rites. That these external things could not represent external but internal things, is evident from what has been adduced. Thus Jacob could not represent as Jacob, because “Jacob” is the external of the church; but Jacob could represent as Israel, because “Israel” is its internal. This is what is meant by the new quality given in order that the posterity of Jacob might represent.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.