The Bible

 

synty 10

Study

   

1 Tämä on Noan lasten sukukunta: Semin, Hamin ja Japhetin: ja heille syntyi lapsia vedenpaisumisen jälkeen.

2 Japhetin lapset: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan ja Tubal: Mesek ja Tiras.

3 Mutta Gomerin lapset: Askenas, Riphad ja Togarma.

4 Javanin lapset: Elisa ja Tarsis: Kittim ja Dodanim.

5 Näistä ovat hajoitetut pakanain luodot, heidän maakunnissansa, itsekukin oman kielensä jälkeen: heidän sukukuntainsa jälkeen, heidän kansoissansa.

6 Hamin lapset: Kus, Misraim, Put ja Kanaan.

7 Kuksen lapset: Seba, Hevila, Sabta, Naema ja Sabteka. Naeman lapset: Skepa ja Dedan.

8 Mutta Kus siitti Nimrodin: hän rupesi olemaan valtias maalla.

9 Ja hän oli jalo metsämies Herran edessä. Siitä on sananlasku: se on jalo metsämies Herran edessä, niinkuin Nimrod.

10 Ja hänen valtakuntansa alku oli Babel, Erek, Akad ja Kalne, Sinearin maalla.

11 Siitä maakunnasta tuli hän Assyriaan: ja rakensi Niniven, ja Rehobotin kaupungin, ja Kalan.

12 Ja myös Ressen, Niniven ja Kalan vaiheelle: joka on suuri kaupunki.

13 Misraim siitti Ludimin, Anamimin, Leabimin, Naphtuhimin.

14 Patrusimin ja Kasluhimin; joista tulleet ovat Philistim ja Kaphtorim.

15 Mutta Kanaan siitti esikoisensa Sidonin ja Hetin.

16 Ja Jebusin, Emorin, Girgosin.

17 Hivin, Arkin, Sinin,

18 Ja Arvadin, Semarin ja Hamatin. Sitten ovat hajoitetut Kanaanealaisten suvut.

19 Ja Kanaanealaisten rajat olivat Sidonista Gerarin kautta hamaan Gatsaan: Sodomaan, ja Gomorraan, ja Adamaan, Seboimiin päin, Lasaan asti.

20 Nämät ovat Hamin lapset heidän sukukuntainsa ja kieltensä jälkeen: heidän maakunnissansa ja kansoissansa.

21 Mutta myös itse Semille syntyi lapsia: hän oli kaikkein Eberin lasten isä: Japhetin sen vanhimman veli.

22 (Ja nämät ovat) Semin lapset: Elam ja Assur: Arphaksad, Lud ja Aram.

23 Ja Aramin lapset: Uts, Hul, Geter ja Mas.

24 Mutta Arphaksad siitti Salan: Sala siitti Eberin.

25 Eberille syntyi kaksi poikaa: yksi kutsuttiin Peleg, että hänen aikanansa maailma jaettiin: hänen veljensä kutsuttiin Joktan.

26 Joktan siitti Almodadin ja Salephin: Hasarmavetin ja Jaran.

27 Hadoramin, Usalin, Dikelan.

28 Obalin, Abimaelin, Seban.

29 Ophirin, Hevilan ja Jobabin. Kaikki nämä ovat Joktanin pojat.

30 Ja heidän asumasiansa oli Mesasta: siihen asti kuin Sephariin tullaan, vuoren tykö, itään päin.

31 Nämät ovat Semin lapset, sukukuntainsa ja kieltensä jälkeen: heidän maakunnissansa, kansainsa jälkeen.

32 Nämät ovat Noan lasten sukukunnat, heidän heimokuntainsa jälkeen, heidän kansoissansa. Ja näistä ovat kansat jaetut maan päälle vedenpaisumisen jälkeen.

   


SWORD version by Tero Favorin (tero at favorin dot com)

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #1188

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

1188. That falsities of doctrine are signified by “Nineveh,” and such things also from another origin by “Rehoboth and Calah,” is evident from the signification of Nineveh in the Word, concerning which presently. Falsities of this kind are from three origins. The first is from the fallacies of the senses in the obscurity of an unenlightened understanding, and from ignorance; hence comes the falsity which is “Nineveh.” The second origin is from the same cause, but with a predominant cupidity, such as that for innovation, or for pre-eminence: the falsities from this origin are “Rehoboth.” The third origin is from the will and thus from cupidities, in that men are unwilling to acknowledge anything as truth that does not favor their cupidities; hence come the falsities which are called “Calah.” All these falsities arise through Asshur, or reasonings concerning the truths and goods of faith.

[2] That “Nineveh” signifies falsities from the fallacies of the senses in the obscurity of an unenlightened understanding, and from ignorance, is evident in Jonah, who was sent to Nineveh, which city was pardoned because they were such, and from the particulars in Jonah concerning Nineveh, of which by the Divine mercy of the Lord in another place. The particulars there are historical, and yet prophetical, involving and representing such arcana, as do all the other historicals of the Word.

[3] Likewise in Isaiah, where it is said of the king of Asshur that he remained in Nineveh, and that when he bowed himself in the house of Nisroch his god, his sons slew him with the sword (Isaiah 37:37-38). Although these things are historical, yet they are prophetical, involving and representing similar arcana; and here by “Nineveh” is signified external worship in which there are falsities; and because this was idolatrous he was slain by his sons with the sword. “Sons” are falsities, as has been shown before; “the sword” is the punishment of falsity, as everywhere in the Word.

[4] In Zephaniah also:

Jehovah will stretch forth His hand upon the north, and will destroy Asshur, and will make Nineveh a desolation, a dryness like the wilderness. And flocks shall lie down in the midst of her, every wild beast of his kind, the cormorant and the bittern also shall pass the night in the pomegranates thereof, a voice shall sing in the windows, wasteness upon the threshold, for he hath laid bare its cedar (Zephaniah 2:13-14).

Nineveh is here described, but in the prophetic style, and the falsity itself which is signified by Nineveh. This falsity, because it is worshiped, is called “the north, the wild beast of his kind, the cormorant and the bittern in the pomegranates,” and is described by “a voice singing in the windows,” and by “laying bare the cedar,” which is intellectual truth. All these expressions are significative of such falsity.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.