The Bible

 

Genezo 16

Study

   

1 Kaj Saraj, la edzino de Abram, ne naskis al li; sed sxi havis sklavinon, Egiptinon, kies nomo estis Hagar.

2 Kaj Saraj diris al Abram: Jen la Eternulo sxlosis min, ke mi ne nasku; eniru do al mia sklavino, eble mi havos infanojn per sxi. Kaj Abram obeis la vocxon de Saraj.

3 Kaj Saraj, la edzino de Abram, prenis Hagaron la Egiptinon, sian sklavinon, kiam pasis dek jaroj de la tempo, kiam Abram eklogxis en la lando Kanaana, kaj sxi donis sxin al sia edzo Abram kiel edzinon.

4 Kaj li venis al Hagar, kaj sxi gravedigxis. Kaj sxi vidis, ke sxi gravedigxis, kaj tiam sxia sinjorino senvalorigxis en sxiaj okuloj.

5 Kaj Saraj diris al Abram: Vi estas maljusta kontraux mi; mi donis mian sklavinon en viajn brakojn, sed kiam sxi vidis, ke sxi gravedigxis, mi senvalorigxis en sxiaj okuloj; la Eternulo jugxu inter mi kaj vi.

6 Kaj Abram diris al Saraj: Jen via sklavino estas en viaj manoj, faru kun sxi cxion, kio placxas al vi. Kaj Saraj komencis premi sxin, kaj sxi forkuris.

7 Kaj trovis sxin angxelo de la Eternulo cxe akva fonto en la dezerto, cxe la fonto sur la vojo al SXur.

8 Kaj li diris: Hagar, sklavino de Saraj, de kie vi venas kaj kien vi iras? Kaj sxi diris: De Saraj, mia sinjorino, mi forkuras.

9 Kaj la angxelo de la Eternulo diris al sxi: Reiru al via sinjorino, kaj humiligxu sub sxiaj manoj.

10 Kaj la angxelo de la Eternulo diris al sxi: Mi multigos vian idaron tiel, ke pro multeco oni ne povos gxin kalkuli.

11 Kaj la angxelo de la Eternulo diris al sxi: Jen vi estas graveda, kaj vi naskos filon; kaj vi donos al li la nomon Isxmael, cxar la Eternulo auxdis vian suferon.

12 Kaj li estos homo sovagxa; lia mano estos kontraux cxiuj, kaj la manoj de cxiuj kontraux li, kaj li logxos antaux cxiuj siaj fratoj.

13 Kaj la Eternulon, kiu parolis al sxi, sxi nomis: Dio-kiu-min-vidis; cxar sxi diris: CXi tie mi vidis Tiun, kiu min vidas; kaj cxu mi poste vivas?

14 Tial oni nomis tiun puton puto de la Vivanto-Vidanto; gxi estas inter Kadesx kaj Bered.

15 Kaj Hagar naskis al Abram filon; kaj Abram donis al sia filo, kiun naskis Hagar, la nomon Isxmael.

16 Kaj Abram havis la agxon de okdek ses jaroj, kiam Hagar naskis Isxmaelon al Abram.

   

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #1911

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

1911. 'And she saw that she had conceived, and her mistress was despised in her eyes' means that this rational at its conception despised truth itself that was allied to good. This is clear from the meaning of 'mistress', or Sarai, as truth allied to good. The rational conceived first is unable to acknowledge intellectual or spiritual truth as truth because it has clinging to it many illusions that are a product of what is known about the world and the natural order, and many appearances which are not truths but are a product of things known from the literal sense of the Word. For example,

[2] It is an intellectual truth that all life is from the Lord. The rational conceived first does not apprehend this, but supposes that if it did not live of itself it would possess no life at all; indeed it is angry if anything different is asserted, as I have noticed frequently in the case of spirits who cling to the illusions of the senses.

[3] It is an intellectual truth that all good and truth are from the Lord. Again, the rational conceived first does not apprehend this because of its sensation that these are as if from itself; and also it supposes that if good and truth are not from itself, it is unable to think, let alone perform, anything good and true, and that if it did have some other source it would give up its own efforts and constantly wait for influx into itself.

[4] It is an intellectual truth that nothing but good, and not even the smallest amount of evil, comes from the Lord. The rational conceived first does not believe this either, but it supposes that because the Lord rules over every single thing, even evil derives from Him. And because He is all powerful and present everywhere and is Goodness itself but does not abolish the punishments of evil people in hell, it supposes that He wills the evil of punishment, when in fact He does not do evil to anyone and does not will that anyone should be punished.

[5] It is an intellectual truth that the celestial man has from the Lord a perception of good and truth. But the first rational either denies the existence of perception altogether or else it supposes that if it did perceive from another and not from its own self it would be like one who is inanimate, or devoid of life. Indeed the more that the thinking of the rational is based on the facts that arise from sensory evidence and the more it is based on philosophical arguments, the less it apprehends these and all other intellectual truths, for the illusions that result are enveloped in shadows darker still. This is why the learned are less believing than others.

[6] Since the rational conceived first is such, it is clear that 'it despises its mistress', that is, it despises intellectual truth. Intellectual truth is not open to view, that is, it is not acknowledged, until illusions and appearances have been dispersed, and these are never dispersed as long as a person reasons about truths themselves on the basis of sensory evidence and factual knowledge. But the moment he believes in simplicity of heart that it is the truth because the Lord has declared it to be so, the shadows of illusions are at that point dispelled, and then there is nothing to stop him apprehending it.

[7] With the Lord however no illusions were present; but when His rational was first conceived there were appearances of truth which were not truths in themselves, as is evident from what has been stated in 1661. This also explains why His rational when first conceived despised intellectual truth, but step by step, as the rational became Divine, the clouds of appearances were dispersed and intellectual truths in their light were for Him open to view. This was represented and meant by the expulsion of Ishmael from the house when Isaac grew up. That the Lord did not despise intellectual truth but that He perceived and saw that His new rational did so will be clear from what follows in 1914.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.