The Bible

 

創世記 27

Study

   

1 以撒年老,眼睛昏花,不能見,就了他大兒子以掃來,:我兒。以掃:我在這裡。

2 :我如今老了,不知道一天死。

3 現在拿你的器械,就是箭囊和,往田野去為我打獵,

4 照我所的做成美味,拿給我,使我在未之先給你祝福

5 以撒對他兒子以掃說話,利百加也見了。以掃往田野去打獵,要得野味帶來

6 利百加就對他兒子雅各:我見你父親對你哥哥以掃

7 你去把野獸帶來,做成美味給我,我好在未死之先,在耶和華面前給你祝福

8 現在,我兒,你要照著我所吩咐你的,從我的話。

9 你到羊群裡去,給我拿兩隻肥山羊羔來,我便照你父親的給他做成美味。

10 你拿到你父親那裡給他,使他在未之先給你祝福

11 雅各對他母親利百加:我哥哥以掃渾身是有毛的,我身上是光滑的;

12 倘若我父親摸著我,必以我為欺哄人的,我就招咒詛,不得祝福。

13 母親對他:我兒,你招的咒詛歸到我身上;你只管我的話,去把羊羔給我拿來。

14 他便去拿來,交給他母親;他母親就照他父親的做成美味。

15 利百加又把家裡所存大兒子以掃上好的衣服給他小兒子雅各穿上,

16 又用山羊包在雅各的上和頸項的光滑處,

17 就把所做的美味和餅交在他兒子雅各裡。

18 雅各到他父親那裡:我父親!他:我在這裡。我兒,你是誰?

19 雅各對他父親:我是你的長子以掃;我已照你所吩咐我的行了。請起來坐著我的野味,好給我祝福

20 以撒對他兒子:我兒,你如何得這麼呢?他:因為耶和華─你的使我遇見好機會得著的。

21 以撒雅各:我兒,你前來,我摸摸你,知道你真是我的兒子以掃不是?

22 雅各就挨父親以撒以撒摸著他,:聲音是雅各的聲音,卻是以掃

23 以撒就辨不出他來;因為他上有毛,像他哥哥以掃一樣,就給他祝福

24 :你真是我兒子以掃麼?他:我是。

25 以撒:你遞給我,我好兒子的野味,給你祝福。雅各就遞給他,他便吃了,又拿酒給他,他也了。

26 父親以撒對他:我兒,你上前來與我親嘴。

27 他就上前與父親親嘴。他父親一衣服上的香氣,就給他祝福:我兒的香氣如同耶和華賜福之田地的香氣一樣。

28 賜你上的甘上的肥土,並許多五穀新酒

29 願多民事奉你,多國跪拜你。願你作你弟兄的主;你母親的兒子向你跪拜。凡咒詛你的,願他受咒詛;為你祝福的,願他蒙福。

30 以撒雅各祝福已畢,雅各從他父親那裡才出,他哥哥以掃正打獵回

31 也做了美味,拿來給他父親:請父親起來,兒子的野味,好給我祝福

32 父親以撒對他:你是誰?他:我是你的長子以掃

33 以撒地戰兢,:你未之先,是誰得了野味拿給我呢?我已經吃了,為他祝福;他將也必蒙福。

34 以掃了他父親,就放聲痛哭,:我父阿,求你也為我祝福

35 以撒:你兄弟已經用詭計將你的福分奪去了。

36 以掃:他名雅各,豈不是正對麼?因為他欺騙了我兩次:他從前奪了我長子的名分,你看,他現在又奪了我的福分。以掃又:你沒有留下為我可祝的福麼?

37 以撒回答以掃:我已立他為你的主,使他的弟兄都他作僕人,並賜他五穀新酒可以養生。我兒,現在我還能為你做甚麼呢?

38 以掃對他父親:父阿,你只有樣可祝的福麼?我父阿,求你也為我祝福以掃就放聲而哭。

39 父親以撒上的肥土必為你所上的甘必為你所得。

40 你必倚靠刀度日,又必事奉你的兄弟;到你強盛的時候,必從你頸項上掙開他的軛。

41 以掃因他父親雅各祝的福,就怨恨雅各:為我父親居喪的日子近了,到那時候,我要殺我的兄弟雅各

42 有人把利百加大兒子以掃告訴利百加,他就打發人去,了他小兒子雅各來,對他:你哥哥以掃想要殺你,報仇雪恨。

43 現在,我兒,你要我的話:起來,逃往哈蘭、我哥哥拉班那裡去,

44 同他些日子,直等你哥哥的怒氣消了。

45 哥哥向你消了怒氣,忘了你向他所做的事,我便打發人去把你從那裡帶回來。為甚麼日喪你們人呢?

46 利百加對以撒:我因這赫人的女子連性命都厭煩了;倘若雅各也娶赫人的女子為妻,像這些一樣,我活著還有甚麼益處呢?

   

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #3570

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

3570. And he brought it near to him, and he did eat. That this signifies the conjunction of good first; and that “he brought him wine and he drank” signifies the conjunction of truth afterwards, is evident from the signification of “eating,” as being to be conjoined and appropriated in respect to good (concerning which just above, n. 3568); and from the signification of “wine,” as being the truth which is from good (n. 1071, 1798); and from the signification of “drinking,” as being to be conjoined and appropriated in respect to truth (n. 3168). In regard to the circumstance that the good of the rational, represented by Isaac, conjoins with itself good first, and truth afterwards, and this through the natural, which is Jacob, the case is this: When the natural is in the state in which it is outwardly good and inwardly truth (n. 3539, 3548, 3556, 3563), it then admits many things which are not good, but which nevertheless are useful, being means to good in their order. But the good of the rational does not conjoin and appropriate to itself from this source anything but that which is in agreement with its own good;, for good receives nothing else, and whatever disagrees, it rejects. The rest of the things in the natural it leaves, in order that they may serve as means for admitting and introducing more things that are in agreement with itself.

[2] The rational is in the internal man, and what is there being transacted is unknown to the natural, for it is above the sphere of its observation; and for this reason the man who lives a merely natural life cannot know anything of what is taking place with him in his internal man, that is, in his rational; for the Lord disposes all such things entirely without the man’s knowledge. Hence it is that man knows nothing of how he is being regenerated, and scarcely that he is being regenerated. But if he is desirous to know this, let him merely attend to the ends which he proposes to himself, and which he rarely discloses to anyone. If the ends are toward good, that is to say, if he cares more for his neighbor and the Lord than for himself, then he is in a state of regeneration; but if the ends are toward evil, that is to say, if he cares more for himself than for his neighbor and the Lord, let him know that in this case he is in no state of regeneration.

[3] Through his ends of life a man is in the other life; through ends of good in heaven with the angels; but through ends of evil in hell with devils. The ends in a man are nothing else than his loves; for that which a man loves he has for an end; and inasmuch as his ends are his loves, they are his inmost life (n. 1317, 1568, 1571, 1645, 1909, 3425, 3562, 3565). The ends of good in a man are in his rational, and these are what are called the rational as to good, or the good of the rational. Through the ends of good, or through the good therein, the Lord disposes all things that are in the natural; for the end is as the soul, and the natural is as the body of this soul; and such as the soul is, such is the body with which it is encompassed; thus such as the rational is as to good, such is the natural with which it is invested.

[4] It is known that the soul of man commences in the ovum of the mother, and is afterwards perfected in her womb, and is there encompassed with a tender body, and this of such a nature that through it the soul may be able to act in a manner suited to the world into which it is born. The case is the same when man is born again, that is, when he is being regenerated. The new soul which he then receives is the end of good, which commences in the rational, at first as in an ovum there, and afterwards is there perfected as in a womb; the tender body with which this soul is encompassed is the natural and the good therein, which becomes such as to act obediently in accordance with the ends of the soul; the truths therein are like the fibers in the body, for truths are formed from good (n. 3470). Hence it is evident that an image of the reformation of man is presented in his formation in the womb; and if you will believe it, it is also the celestial good and spiritual truth which are from the Lord that form him and then impart the power to receive each of them successively, and this in quality and quantity precisely as like a man he looks to the ends of heaven, and not like a brute animal to the ends of the world.

[5] That the rational as to good through the natural conjoins with itself good first, and truth afterwards, which is signified by Jacob’s bringing dainties and bread to Isaac and his eating, and bringing him wine and his drinking, may also be illustrated by the offices which the body performs for its soul. It is the soul which gives to the body to have appetite for food, and also to enjoy the taste of it, the foods being introduced by means of the delight of appetite and the delight of taste, thus by means of external good; but the foods which are introduced do not all enter the life, for some serve as menstruums for digesting; some for tempering; some for opening; some for introducing into the vessels; but the good foods selected are introduced into the blood, and become blood, out of which the soul conjoins with itself such things as are of use.

[6] The case is the same with the rational and the natural: to appetite and taste correspond the desire and the affection of knowing truth; and knowledges correspond to foods (n. 1480); and because they correspond, they are circumstanced in like manner; the soul (which is the good of the rational) gives to long for and to be affected with the things which are of memory-knowledge and of doctrine, and introduces them through the delight of the longing and the good of the affection. But the things which it introduces are not all such as to become the good of life; for some serve as means for a kind of digesting and tempering; some for opening and introducing; but the goods which are of life it applies to itself, and thus conjoins them with itself, and from them forms for itself truths. From this it is evident how the rational disposes the natural, in order that it may serve it as the soul or what is the same, may serve the end, which is the soul, to perfect itself, that it may be of use in the Lord’s kingdom.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.