The Bible

 

創世記 21

Study

   

1 耶和華按著先前的話眷顧撒拉,便照他所的給撒拉成就。

2 亞伯拉罕年老的時候,撒拉懷了孕;到的日期,就給亞伯拉罕生了一個兒子

3 亞伯拉罕給撒拉所生的兒子起名以撒

4 以撒生下來第八日,亞伯拉罕照著所吩咐的,給以撒行了割禮

5 兒子以撒生的時候,亞伯拉罕年一歲。

6 撒拉使我喜笑,凡見的必與我一同喜笑;

7 :誰能預先對亞伯拉罕撒拉要養嬰孩呢?因為在他年老的時候,我給他生了一個兒子

8 孩子漸長,就斷了奶。以撒斷奶的日子,亞伯拉罕設擺豐盛的筵席。

9 當時,撒拉見埃及人夏甲給亞伯拉罕所生的兒子戲笑,

10 就對亞伯拉罕:你把這使女和他兒子趕出去!因為這使女的兒子不可與我的兒子以撒一同承受產業。

11 亞伯拉罕因他兒子的緣故很憂愁。

12 亞伯拉罕:你不必為這童子和你的使女憂愁。凡撒拉對你的話,你都該從;因為從以撒生的,才要稱為你的後裔。

13 至於使女的兒子,我也必使他的後裔成立一國,因為他是你所生的。

14 亞伯拉罕起來,拿餅和一皮袋了夏甲,搭在他的肩上,又把孩子交他,打發他走。夏甲就走了,在別是巴的曠野走迷了路。

15 皮袋的用盡了,夏甲就把孩子撇在小樹底

16 自己走開約有一箭之遠,相對而:我不忍見孩子,就相對而,放聲大哭。

17 見童子的聲音;的使者從呼叫夏甲:夏甲,你為何這樣呢?不要害怕已經見童子的聲音了。

18 起來!把童子抱在懷(原文作)中,我必使他的後裔成為國。

19 使夏甲的眼睛明亮,他就見一口,便去將皮袋盛滿了,給童子喝。

20 保佑童子,他就漸長,在曠野,成了弓箭手。

21 在巴蘭的曠野;他母親埃及給他娶了一個妻子

22 當那時候,亞比米勒同他軍長非各對亞伯拉罕:凡你所行的事都有的保佑。

23 我願你如今在這裡指著對我起誓,不要欺負我與我的兒子,並我的子孫。我怎樣厚待了你,你也要照樣厚待我與你所寄居這的民。

24 亞伯拉罕:我情願起誓。

25 從前,亞比米勒的僕人霸佔了一口亞伯拉罕為這事指責亞比米勒。

26 亞比米勒:誰做這事,我不知道,你也沒有告訴我,今日我才見了。

27 亞伯拉罕和牛了亞比米勒,人就彼此立約。

28 亞伯拉罕隻母羔另放在一處。

29 亞比米勒問亞伯拉罕:你把這隻母羊羔另放在一處,是甚麼意思呢?

30 :你要從我裡受這隻母羊羔,作我這口的證據。

31 所以他給那地方起名別是巴,因為他們人在那裡起了誓。(別是巴就是盟誓的井的意思)

32 他們在別是巴立了約,亞比米勒就同他軍長非各起身回非利士去了。

33 亞伯拉罕在別是巴栽上一棵垂絲柳樹,又在那裡求告耶和華─永生神的名。

34 亞伯拉罕非利士人寄居了多日。

   

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #2718

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

2718. 'A wife from the land of Egypt' means the affection for knowledge, which the member of the spiritual Church possesses. This is clear from the meaning of 'a wife' as affection or good, dealt with in 915, 2517, and from the meaning of 'Egypt' as knowledge, dealt with in 1164, 1165, 1186, 1462. In this verse the member of the spiritual Church is described so far as the nature of his good, that is, the essence of his life, is concerned - that the good residing with him is obscure, but that it is brightened with light from the Lord's Divine Human. From that brightening of it the affection for truth arises in the rational part of his mind, and the affection for knowledge in the natural part. The reason the affection for good such as resides within the celestial man cannot arise in the spiritual man, but instead the affection for truth, is that the good residing with him is implanted in the understanding part of his mind, and is obscure compared with the celestial man's good, as shown in 2715. From this good no other type of affection can be generated and derived within his rational than the affection for truth, and through this affection for truth the affection for knowledge within the natural. No other truth is meant in this case than that which the person believes to be the truth, even though it may not in itself be the truth. Nor is knowledge used to mean such knowledge as the learned possess but all factual knowledge with which a person can be taught from what he experiences or hears in everyday life, from doctrine, and from the Word. It is the affection for such truth and knowledge that exists within the member of the spiritual Church.

[2] So that it may be known what is meant by the affection for truth existing with someone and what by the affection for good, let a brief statement be made regarding them. Those with the affection for truth think about, question, and discuss whether a thing is true, whether it is so. And when they are convinced it is true, or is so, they think about, question, and discuss what it is. Thus they remain rooted on the doorstep and cannot be admitted into wisdom until they no longer have any doubts. Those however with whom the affection for good exists know and perceive that the thing is so from the good itself governing them. Thus they do not remain on the doorstep but are in a room inside, having been admitted into wisdom.

[3] Take as an example the consideration that it is a celestial gift to think and to act from an affection for good, or from good. Those with whom the affection for truth exists discuss whether this is so, whether such a gift can exist, and what it may be. And so long as they are turning over doubts about it they are unable to be admitted. But those with the affection for good do not discuss or turn doubts over but assert that the thing is true and are for that reason admitted. For those with whom the affection for good exists, that is, those who are celestial, start off where those with the affection for truth, that is, those who are spiritual, come to a halt, so that the furthest point reached by the latter is the starting point for the former. That being so, those who are celestial are given to know, recognize, and perceive that affections for good are countless - as numerous as the communities in heaven - and that they are all joined together by the Lord into a heavenly form so as to constitute one human being so to speak. They are also given to define by perception the genus and species to which each affection belongs.

[4] Or take this example: All delight, blessedness, and happiness belong wholly to love, but the nature of the love determines that of the delight, blessedness, and happiness. The spiritual man fixes his mind on the question whether this is true and whether delight, blessedness, and happiness may not spring from some other source, such as from mixing with others, talking to others, meditation, or learning, and also whether they reside in possessions, position, reputation, and the glory resulting from these. As long as he is asking such questions he does not confirm himself in the truth that none of these accomplishes anything, only the affection born of love which is present within them and making them what they are. The celestial man however does not remain rooted in such preliminary questionings but immediately asserts that the thing is true. Consequently he is interested in the end in view and the realization of this, that is, he is governed by the very affections born of love which are countless, and in each one of which there are things beyond description, involving variations of delight, blessedness, and happiness that have no end.

[5] Take as a further example the consideration that the neighbour is to be loved for the good that resides with him. Those with whom the affection for truth exists think, question, and discuss whether this is true, that is, whether it is so. They ask what the neighbour is, what good is; but they go no further than this, and therefore they shut the door to wisdom against themselves. Those however with the affection for good assert that the thing is so and do not consequently shut the door against themselves but enter in and so come to know, recognize, and perceive from good who is pre-eminently the neighbour, also in what degree he is the neighbour, and that everyone in differing ways is the neighbour. Thus they perceive things beyond description, over and above what is known to those with the affection solely for truth.

[6] Take as yet another example the truth that a person who loves the neighbour for the good within him loves the Lord. Those with the affection for truth question whether this is so. And if they are told that anyone who loves the neighbour for the good within him loves the good, and that - since all good comes from the Lord and the Lord is present in good - when anyone loves good he also loves the Lord from whom that good comes and in which He is present, they then question whether that too is so. They also ask what loving good is, as well as what good is, and whether the Lord is present more so in good than in truth. As long as they remain rooted in such questionings they cannot get even a distant view of wisdom. But those with the affection for good know from perception that the thing is so and immediately behold the whole field of wisdom leading right on to the Lord.

[7] From these examples it may become clear why in comparison with those who have the affection for good, that is, with those who are celestial, obscurity exists with those who have the affection for truth, that is, with those who are spiritual Nevertheless the latter are able to pass from obscurity into light, provided that they are willing to adopt the affirmative attitude that all good belongs to love to the Lord and charity towards the neighbour; also that love and charity constitute spiritual conjunction, and that these are the source of all blessedness and happiness, thus that heavenly life consists in the good belonging to love received from the Lord, but not in the truth of faith separated from it.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.