Bibliorum

 

1 Mosebok 10

Study

   

1 Dette er de ætter som stammer fra Noahs sønner Sem, Kam og Jafet: De fikk sønner efter vannflommen.

2 Jafets sønner var Gomer og Magog og Madai og Javan og Tubal og Mesek og Tiras.

3 Og Gomers sønner var Askenas og ifat og Togarma.

4 Og Javans sønner var Elisa og Tarsis, Kittim og Dodanim.

5 Fra disse bredte de som bor på hedningenes kyster, sig ut i sine land, med sine forskjellige tungemål, efter sine ætter, i sine folkeslag.

6 Og Kams sønner var Kus og Misra'im og Put og Kana'an.

7 Og Kus' sønner var Seba og Havila og Sabta og aema og Sabteka, og aemas sønner var Sjeba og Dedan.

8 Og Kus fikk sønnen Nimrod; han var den første som fikk stort velde på jorden.

9 Han var en veldig jeger for Herrens åsyn; derfor sier folk: En veldig jeger for Herrens åsyn som Nimrod.

10 Først hersket han over Babel og Erek og Akkad og Kalne i landet Sinear.

11 Fra dette land drog han ut til Assur og bygget Ninive og ehobot-Ir og Kalah

12 og esen mellem Ninive og Kalah; dette er den store stad.

13 Og Misra'im blev stamfar til luderne og anamerne og lehaberne og naftuherne

14 og patruserne og kasluherne, som filistrene er kommet fra, og kaftorerne.

15 Og Kana'an blev far til Sidon, som var hans førstefødte, og til Het

16 og til jebusittene og amorittene og girgasittene

17 og hevittene og arkittene og sinittene

18 og arvadittene og semarittene og hamatittene; siden bredte kana'anittenes ætter sig videre ut.

19 Og kana'anittenes grense gikk fra Sidon bortimot Gerar like til Gasa, og bortimot Sodoma og Gomorra og Adma og Sebo'im like til Lesa.

20 Dette var Kams barn, efter sine ætter, med sine tungemål, i sine land, i sine folkeslag.

21 Også Sem fikk barn; han var stamfar til alle Ebers barn og var den eldste bror av Jafet.

22 Sems sønner var Elam og Assur og Arpaksad og Lud og Aram.

23 Og Arams sønner var Us og Hul og Geter og Mas.

24 Og Arpaksad fikk sønnen Salah, og Salah fikk sønnen Eber.

25 Og Eber fikk to sønner; den ene hette Peleg, for i hans dager blev menneskene spredt over jorden; og hans bror hette Joktan.

26 Og Joktan blev far til Almodad og Salef og Hasarmavet og Jarah

27 og Hadoram og Usal og Dikla

28 og Obal og Abimael og Sjeba

29 og Ofir og Havila og Jobab; alle disse var Joktans sønner.

30 De hadde sine bosteder i fjellbygdene i øst fra Mesa bortimot Sefar.

31 Dette var Sems barn efter sine ætter, med sine tungemål, i sine land, i sine folkeslag.

32 Dette var Noahs sønners ætter efter sin avstamning, i sine folkeslag; og fra dem har folkene utbredt sig på jorden efter vannflommen.

   

from the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg

 

Arcana Coelestia #1361

Studere hoc loco

  
/ 10837  
  

1361. That from being idolatrous the church became representative, no one can know unless he knows what a representative is. The things that were represented in the Jewish Church, and in the Word, are the Lord and His kingdom, consequently the celestial things of love, and the spiritual things of faith: these are what were represented, besides many things that pertain to these, such as all things that belong to the church. The representing objects are either persons or things that are in the world or upon the earth; in a word, all things that are objects of the senses, insomuch that there is scarcely any object that cannot be a representative. But it is a general law of representation that there is no reflection upon the person or upon the thing which represents, but only upon that thing itself which is represented.

[2] For example, every king, whoever he was, in Judah and Israel, and even in Egypt and elsewhere, could represent the Lord. Their royalty itself is what is representative. So that the worst of all kings could represent, such as the Pharaoh who set Joseph over the land of Egypt, Nebuchadnezzar in Babylon (Daniel 2:37-38), Saul, and the other kings of Judah and of Israel, of whatever character they were. The anointing itself-from which they were called Jehovah’s anointed-involved this. In like manner all priests, how many soever they were, represented the Lord; the priestly function itself being what is representative; and so in like manner the priests who were evil and impure; because in representatives there is no reflection upon the person, in regard to what his quality is. And not only did men represent, but also beasts, such as all that were offered in sacrifice; the lambs and sheep representing celestial things; the doves and turtledoves, spiritual things; and in like manner the rams, goats, bullocks, and oxen represented lower celestial and spiritual things.

[3] And not only were animate things used as representatives, but also inanimate things, such as the altar and even the stones of the altar, the ark and the tabernacle with all that was in them, and, as everyone may know, the temple with all that was therein, such as the lamps, the breads, and the garments of Aaron. Nor these things only, but also all the rites in the Jewish Church were representative. In the Ancient Churches, representatives extended to all the objects of the senses, to mountains and hills, to valleys, plains, rivers, brooks, fountains, and pools, to groves and trees in general, and to every tree in particular, insomuch that each tree had some definite signification; all which, afterwards, when the significative church had ceased, were made representatives. From all this it may be seen what is meant by representatives. And as things celestial and spiritual-that is-the things of the Lord’s kingdom in the heavens, and of the Lord’s kingdom on earth could be represented not only by men, whosoever and of what quality soever they were, but also by beasts, and even by inanimate things, it may now be seen what a representative church is.

[4] The representatives were of such an efficacy that all things that were done according to the rites commanded appeared holy before the spirits and angels, as for instance when the high priest washed himself with water, when he ministered clothed in his pontifical garments, when he stood before the burning lights, no matter what kind of man he was, even if most impure, and in his heart an idolater. The case was the same with all the other priests. For, as before said, in representatives the person was not reflected upon, but only the thing itself that was represented, quite abstractly from the person, as it was abstractly from the oxen, the bullocks, and the lambs that were sacrificed, or from the blood that was poured round about the altar, and also abstractly from the altar itself; and so on.

[5] This representative church was instituted-after all internal worship was lost, and when worship had become not only merely external, but also idolatrous-in order that there might be some conjunction of heaven with earth, that is, of the Lord through heaven with man, even after the conjunction by the internal things of worship had perished. But what kind of conjunction this is by representatives alone, shall of the Lord’s Divine mercy be told in what follows. Representatives do not begin until the following chapter; in which, and in those that follow, all things in general and in particular are purely representative. Here, the subject treated of is the state of those who were the fathers, before certain of them and their descendants became representative; and it has been shown above that they were in idolatrous worship.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.