Bibliorum

 

Ezekielis 25

Study

   

1 Viešpats kalbėjo man:

2 “Žmogaus sūnau, pranašauk prieš amonitus.

3 Sakyk amonitams: ‘Išgirskite Viešpaties Dievo žodį! Taip sako Viešpats Dievas: ‘Kadangi jūs džiūgavote dėl to, kad mano šventykla išniekinta, Izraelio šalis sunaikinta ir Judo namai išvesti nelaisvėn,

4 atiduosiu jus rytų šalies gyventojams. Jie išties savo palapines tarp jūsų ir įrengs stovyklas, jie valgys jūsų vaisius ir gers jūsų pieną.

5 Aš padarysiu abą vieta kupranugariams ir amonitų kraštą­gardais avims. Tada jūs žinosite, kad Aš esu Viešpats’.

6 Nes taip sako Viešpats: ‘Kadangi jūs plojote rankomis, trypėte kojomis ir nuoširdžiai džiaugėtės niekindami Izraelio žemę,

7 todėl Aš ištiesiu savo ranką prieš jus ir atiduosiu jus tautoms kaip grobį. Aš išnaikinsiu jus tarp tautų ir pražudysiu jus visose šalyse. Aš sunaikinsiu jus, ir tada žinosite, kad Aš esu Viešpats’ ”.

8 Viešpats Dievas sako: “Kadangi Moabas ir Seyras sako, kad Judo namai yra kaip visos kitos tautos,

9 Aš atversiu Moabo šoną, pradėdamas nuo gražiausių miestų, krašto pasididžiavimo: Bet Ješimotų, Baal Meono ir Kirjataimų,

10 Aš juos atiduosiu kartu su amonitais rytų šalies gyventojams, ir amonitai nebebus minimi tarp tautų.

11 Taip Aš įvykdysiu teismą Moabui, ir jis žinos, kad Aš esu Viešpats”.

12 Taip sako Viešpats Dievas: “Kadangi edomitai kerštingai elgėsi su Judo namais ir tuo sunkiai nusikalto,

13 Aš išnaikinsiu edomitus ir jų gyvulius, padarysiu kraštą dykuma; nuo Temano iki Dedano visi kris nuo kardo.

14 Aš bausiu edomitus per savo tautą Izraelį. Jie pasielgs su edomitais pagal mano nutarimą. Ir jie pažins mano kerštą,­sako Viešpats Dievas”.

15 Viešpats Dievas sako: “Kadangi filistinai keršijo be jokio pasigailėjimo ir naikino izraelitus dėl senos neapykantos,

16 Aš ištiesiu savo ranką prieš filistinus, sunaikinsiu keretus ir pajūrio gyventojus.

17 Aš žiauriai atkeršysiu jiems ir nubausiu juos. Tada jie žinos, kad Aš esu Viešpats”.

   

from the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg

 

Arcana Coelestia #3494

Studere hoc loco

  
/ 10837  
  

3494. 'And he called Esau his elder son' means the affection for natural good, or the good of life. This is clear from the representation of 'Esau' as the Divine Good of the Natural, dealt with in 3300, 3302, 3322. And because the good of the natural is that which manifests itself in affection and life, it is accordingly the affection for natural good, or the good of life, that 'Esau' represents here. The affection for good in the natural and consequently the good of life is that which is called 'the elder son', whereas the affection for truth and consequently the doctrine of truth is that which is called 'the younger son'. The fact that the affection for good and consequently the good of life is the elder son, that is, the firstborn, is quite evident from the consideration that good reigns in anyone's children at first. Indeed they are in a state of innocence, and a state of love towards their parents or nursemaid, and a state of mutual charity towards playmates, so that good is the firstborn with everyone. This good which is fostered in this state within a person when he is a small child remains with him, for whatever is instilled in infancy acquires life to itself; and because it remains it becomes the good of life. Indeed if a person were devoid of such good as he has had with him from earliest childhood he would not be human but would be more savage than any wild animal of the forest. Not that its presence is apparent, for everything that has been instilled in earliest childhood inevitably appears to be something natural, as is quite evident from being able to walk, from all our other bodily movements, and from the right and proper ways to behave among other people; also from being able to talk, and from so many other abilities. From this it may be seen that good is 'the elder son', that is, the firstborn, and truth therefore 'the younger son', or one born later, for truth is not learned until childhood, adolescent, and adult years are reached.

[2] Each of them, good and truth in the natural or external man, is 'a son', that is to say, a son of the rational or internal man, for whatever comes into being in the natural or external man flows in from the rational or internal man, and from there comes into being and is born. That which does not come into being and is not born from there is not living and human, but is like what you might call body and senses without a soul. Hence both good and truth are called 'sons', and indeed sons of the rational. Yet it is not the rational that produces and gives birth to the natural, but an influx by way of the rational into the natural, an influx coming from the Lord. His 'sons' therefore are all the young children who are born, and after that time whenever they become wise. Also, insofar as the latter are at that time 'young children' - that is, insofar as the innocence of a young child, the love of a child for its parent (who is now the Lord), and mutual charity towards playmates (who are now the neighbour) exist in them, they are adopted by the Lord as 'sons'.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.