Bibliorum

 

创世记 38

Study

   

1 那时,犹大离开他弟兄去,到一个亚杜兰名叫希拉的家里去。

2 犹大在那里见一个迦南名叫书亚的女儿,就娶他为妻,与他同房,

3 他就怀孕生了儿子,犹大给他起名珥。

4 他又怀孕生了儿子,母亲给他起名俄南。

5 他复又生了儿子,给他起名示拉。他生示拉的时候,犹大正在基悉。

6 犹大长子珥娶妻,名叫他玛。

7 犹大长子珥在耶和华眼中看为恶,耶和华就叫他死了。

8 犹大对俄南:你当与你哥哥妻子同房,向他尽你为弟的本分,为你哥哥生子立後。

9 俄南知道生子不归自己,所以同房的时候便遗在,免得哥哥留後。

10 俄南所做的在耶和华眼中看为恶,耶和华也就叫他死了

11 犹大心里:恐怕示拉也,像他两个哥哥一样,就对他儿妇他玛:你去,在你父亲里守寡,等我儿子示拉长大。他玛就回去,在他父亲里。

12 过了许久,犹大妻子书亚的女儿死了犹大得了安慰,就和他朋友亚杜兰人希拉上亭拿去,到他剪毛的人那里。

13 有人告诉他玛说:你的公公上亭拿剪毛去了。

14 他玛见示拉已经长大,还没有娶他为妻,就脱了他作寡妇的衣裳,用帕子蒙着脸,又遮住身体,在亭拿上的伊拿印城口。

15 犹大见他,以为是妓女,因为他蒙着脸。

16 犹大就到他那里去,罢!让我与你同寝。他原不知道是他的儿妇。他玛:你要与我同寝,把甚麽我呢?

17 犹大:我从羊群里取一只山羊羔,打发人送来你。他玛:在未送以先,你愿意我一个当头麽?

18 :我你甚麽当头呢?他玛:你的印、你的带子,和你里的杖。犹大就了他,与他同寝,他就从犹大怀了孕。

19 他玛起来走了,除去帕子,仍旧穿上作寡妇的衣裳。

20 犹大托他朋友亚杜兰人送一只山羊羔去,要从那女人里取回当头来,却不着他,

21 就问那地方的人:伊拿印旁的妓女在那里?他们:这里并没有妓女。

22 他回去见犹大:我没有着他,并且那地方的人:这里没有妓女。

23 犹大:我把这山羊羔送去了,你竟不着他。任凭他拿去罢,免得我们被羞辱。

24 约过了,有人告诉犹大:你的儿妇他玛作了妓女,且因行淫有了身孕。犹大:拉出他来,把他烧了!

25 他玛被拉出来的时候便打发去见他公公,对他:这些东西是谁的,我就是从谁怀的孕。请你认一认,这印和带子并杖都是谁的?

26 犹大承认:他比我更有,因为我没有将他我的儿子示拉。从此犹大不再与他同寝了。

27 他玛将要生产,不料他腹里是一对双生。

28 到生产的时候,一个孩子伸出一只来;收生婆拿红线拴在他上,说:这是头生的。

29 随後这孩子把收回去,他哥哥生出来了;收生婆:你为甚麽抢着来呢?因此给他起名法勒斯。

30 後来,他兄弟上有红线的也生出来,就给他起名谢拉。

   

from the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg

 

Arcana Coelestia #4747

Studere hoc loco

  
/ 10837  
  

4747. 'And behold, a caravan of Ishmaelites came from Gilead' means those in whom simple good is present like that present in gentiles. This is clear from the representation of 'Ishmaelites' as those in whom simple good is present so far as life is concerned, and who consequently rely on natural truth so far as doctrine is concerned, dealt with in 3263, and from the meaning of 'Gilead' as exterior good into which, when a person is being regenerated, he is introduced first, dealt with in 4117, 4124. From this it is evident that 'a caravan of Ishmaelites from Gilead' means the kind of good that exists with gentiles, that is, those in whom that kind of simple good is present.

[2] The implications of this may be seen from what has been stated up to now and from what follows below, in advance of which only this needs to be mentioned: If people within the Church who have set themselves firmly against Divine truths - in particular against the truths that the Lord's Human is Divine and that the works of charity do contribute something towards salvation - have so set themselves against them not only from doctrine but also in life, they have driven themselves interiorly into the kind of state in which they cannot possibly be brought after that to accept those truths. For once such opposition has become firmly established in life as well as from doctrine it remains for ever. People who have no knowledge of man's interior state may suppose that no matter how much he has set himself firmly against those truths he can still accept them without difficulty after that, provided he is convinced they are truths. But this is impossible, as I have been allowed to know from a great deal of experience of such persons in the next life. For that which is firmly accepted from doctrine is absorbed into the understanding, and that which is firmly accepted in life is absorbed into the will. That which is deeply implanted in both areas of life in man - that is to say, in the life of his understanding and in the life of his will - cannot be rooted out. A person's essential soul which lives after death is shaped by these and it is such that it never withdraws from them. This also is the reason why the lot of those within the Church in whom such attitudes of mind have developed is worse than the lot of those outside the Church. Those outside the Church, called the gentiles, have not set themselves firmly against those truths because they have no knowledge of them. For this reason those among them who have led charitable lives with one another accept Divine truths with ease, if not in the world then in the next life. See what has been presented from experience regarding the state and lot of gentile nations and peoples in the next life, in 2589-2604.

[3] Consequently when a new Church is established by the Lord it is not established among those within the Church but among those outside it, that is, among gentiles. These are referred to many times in the Word. These preliminary remarks have been made so that what is implied by Joseph's being thrown into the pit by his brothers may be known and what by his being drawn out of it by the Midianites and sold to the Ishmaelites. For by 'Joseph's brothers' are represented those people within the Church who have set themselves firmly against Divine Truth, in particular against the two truths that the Lord's Human is Divine and that the works of charity do contribute something towards salvation, being opposed to them not only from doctrine but also in life. By 'the Ishmaelites' however those in whom simple good is present are represented, and by 'the Midianites' those who rely on the truth partnering that good. The latter are recorded as having drawn Joseph out of the pit, the former as having bought him. But what is meant by their bringing him down into Egypt where they sold him to Potiphar, Pharaoh's bedchamber-servant, will be stated further on.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.