बाइबल

 

创世记 17

पढाई करना

   

1 亚伯兰岁的时候,耶和华向他显现,对他:我是全能的神。你当在我面前作完全人,

2 我就与你立约,使你的後裔极其繁多。

3 亚伯兰俯伏在地;又对他

4 我与你立约:你要作多国的父。

5 从此以後,你的名不再亚伯兰,要亚伯拉罕,因为我已立你作多国的父。

6 我必使你的後裔极其繁多;国度从你而立,君从你而出。

7 我要与你并你世世代裔坚立我的约,作永远的约,是要作你和你裔的

8 我要将你现在寄居的,就是迦南,赐你和你的永远为业,我也必作他们的

9 又对亚伯拉罕:你和你的裔必世世代遵守我的约。

10 你们所有的男子都要受割礼;这就是我与你并你的裔所立的约,是你们所当遵守的。

11 你们都要受割礼(原文作割阳皮;14,23,24,25节同);这是我与你们立约的证据。

12 你们世世代的男子,无论是家里生的,是在你後裔之外用子从外人买的,生下来第八日,都要受割礼

13 你家里生的和你用子买的,都必须受割礼。这样,我的约就立在你们体上作永远的约。

14 但不受割礼的男子必从民中剪除,因他背了我的约。

15 又对亚伯拉罕:你的妻子撒莱不可再撒莱,他的名要撒拉。

16 我必赐福他,也要使你从他得一个儿子。我要赐福他,他也要作多国之母;必有百姓的君从他而出。

17 亚伯拉罕就俯伏在地喜笑,:一岁的人还能得孩子麽?撒拉已经九十岁了,还能生养麽?

18 亚伯拉罕:但愿以实玛利活在你面前。

19 :不然,你妻子撒拉要给你生一个儿子,你要给他起名以撒。我要与他坚定所立的约,作他永远的约。

20 至於以实玛利,我也应允你:我必赐福他,使他昌盛,极其繁多。他必生十二个族长;我也要使他成为国。

21 到明年这时节,撒拉必给你生以撒,我要与他坚定所立的约。

22 亚伯拉罕完了话,就离开他上升去了。

23 正当那日,亚伯拉罕遵着的命,给他的儿子以实玛利和家里的一切男子,无论是在家里生的,是用子买的,都行了割礼

24 亚伯拉罕割礼的时候年岁。

25 儿子以实玛利割礼的时候年十三岁。

26 正当那日,亚伯拉罕和他儿子以实玛利一同受了割礼

27 家里所有的人,无论是在家里生的,是用子从外人买的,也都一同受了割礼

   

स्वीडनबॉर्ग के कार्यों से

 

Arcana Coelestia #2209

इस मार्ग का अध्ययन करें

  
/ 10837  
  

2209. 'And I have grown old' means after it ceased to be such - that is, ceased to be [merely] human and not Divine - when that which was human was cast off. This is clear from the meaning of 'growing old' as casting off the human, dealt with above in 2198, 2203. As regards the rational in general, when it thinks about Divine things, especially from the truth it possesses, it cannot possibly believe that such things exist. It is unable to do so because for one thing it has no grasp of them, and for another appearances born from the illusions of the senses cling to it, by means of which and from which it thinks, as becomes clear from the examples which have been introduced above in 2196. To these, for the sake of illustration, let the following be added.

[2] Is the rational, if consulted, able to believe in the existence of the internal sense of the Word which, as has been shown, is so remote from the literal sense? And is it thus able to believe that the Word is that which joins heaven and earth together, that is, the Lord's kingdom in heaven to the Lord's kingdom on earth? Is the rational able to believe that souls after death converse with one another most distinctly, doing so not by means of speech consisting of spoken words, yet nevertheless so completely that they express more in a minute than man does in an hour by the use of his speech; or that the angels likewise converse with one another, but in a language which is more perfect still though imperceptible to spirits; and also that all souls on entering the next life know how to use this kind of speech even though they are never taught how to do so? Is the rational able to believe that present within one affection which a person has, indeed within a single sigh expressing his affection, there are things perceived by angels which are so countless that they cannot possibly be described; or that every affection which a person has, indeed every idea comprising his thought, is an image of him and is such that it includes within it in a wondrous fashion every detail of his life, besides thousands upon thousands of other such things?

[3] When the rational which derives its wisdom from the evidence of the senses, and is wrapped in the illusions of the senses, thinks about such things it does not believe that they can be so, for it is not able to form any idea for itself except from such things as it perceives by some sensory power whether external or internal. How must it be when it thinks about Divine celestial and Divine spiritual things which are higher still? For there must always exist, born from the evidence of the senses, some appearances for thought to rest upon, and when these appearances are withdrawn the idea ceases to exist. This has also become clear to me from spirits who are newcomers and who take very great delight in the appearances they have brought with them from the world. They have said that they did not know whether they would be able to think if those appearances were taken away from them. Such is the nature of the rational regarded in itself.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.