Die Bibel

 

Genesis 30

Lernen

   

2 Iggaz t alham-net iṇṇ'as: «Nak wər əṃosa Məššina. Ənta a dam igdalan təla n aratan.»

3 Təṇṇ'as Raxil: «Əkfeq qay taklit in Bilha, tənəməṇsa dər-əs, tile dər-əs bararan, əssədwəlaq qan, agaqqan bararan in. Əddi nak da ad əqqəla anna.»

4 Iqbal Yaqub a wa das təṇṇa Raxil. Təkf'ay Bilha, isawwahay tat, inamaṇsa dər-əs aṃaran.

5 Təga Bilha tadist təgraw du barar i Yaqub.

6 Təzzar təṇṇa Raxil: «Məššina izazzalalaɣ i əššəriɣa, iqbal təwaṭray nin, aṃaran ikf'i barar». Adi da fəl das təg'eṣəm Dan.

7 Təga Bilha tadist tolas təgraw du barar wa n əššin i Yaqub.

8 Təṇṇa Raxil: «Əgeɣ əməgər iṣṣohen əd tamaqqart in, orne.» Təg-as eṣəm Naftali.

9 As din təgra Leyya as ənta təmməzzay d ara təkfa Yaqub taklit-net Zilfa a tat isəwwəhəy.

10 Təzzar təgraw du Zilfa, taklit ən Leyya, barar i Yaqub.

11 Təṇṇa Leyya aṃaran: «Aṇṇasara nin oṣa ddu!», təg as eṣəm Gad.

12 Dəffər a wen təgraw du Zilfa, taklit ən Leyya, barar wa n əššin i Yaqub.

13 Təṇṇa Leyya tolas: «Əkneɣ aṇṇasara wəllen! Ad əsəttəhəqqətnat təḍoden əs tədəwit in.» Təzzar təg'as eṣəm Ašer.

14 Əzəl iyyan daɣ azzaman n allay n alkama eway Ruben d əṣṣuf har d'igraw aratan n annabat wa išatan aššahwat immigal y əggəgru. Eway tan du y anna-nnet Leyya. Təzzar təṇṇa Raxil i Leyya: «Oṇsayaq qam a di tan takfa.»

15 Təṇṇas Leyya: «Awak wər dam igda as ɣur-əm təlla əṇṇiyat n aləs-in, təṣṣərtəyaɣ a wen d əmmud ən barar in?» Təjjəwwab as Raxil: «Ənəy! Aslu! Oyyeɣ Yaqub a ɣur əm aṇsu ahada, fəl ad idu takfa aratan n annabat win d omad barar nam.»

16 As d'edwa Yaqub alməz ifal du təməḍint təssəlkad-as Leyya, təṇṇ as: «Nak ɣur za taṇsa ahada, eṭəs nak əzzinzaq qu əmmud ən barar in.» Təzzar iṇsa ɣur-əs ahad wədi.

17 Iqbal Məššina təwaṭray ən Leyya. Təzzar təga tadist. Təgraw du i Yaqub barar wa n ṣəmmos.

18 Təlas təṇṇa: «Məššina ikf i alxaqq in fəlas əkfeɣ aləs in taklit in.» Təg'i barar eṣəm Issakar.

19 Təlas igi ən tədist, təgraw d'i Yaqub barar wa n ṣədis.

20 Aṃaran təṇṇa: «Məššina ikf i təhəkkut təqqitasat. Əmərədda aləs in ad i agu almaqam id əkfeq qu ṣədis bararan. Adi da fəl das təga eṣəm Zəbulun.

21 Dəffər a wen təgraw du tabarart, təg'as eṣəm Dina.

22 Məššina ikittəw Raxil. Iqbal təwaṭray-net, ikf et fərregat ən təla ən bararan.

23 Təga tadist təgraw barar təṇṇa: «Məššina ikkas i daɣ takarakit.»

24 Təg'as eṣəm Yusəf, təṇṇa: «Ya Əməli šit'i du iyyan barar!»

25 Ihu Yusəf ɣas, iṇṇa Yaqub i Laban: «Sallam i ad akkaɣ aytedan in daɣ akal nana.

26 Akf i šiḍoden in əd bararan in win a fəl ak əšɣala, ad agla, fəlas təṣṣana kay iṃan nak as əgəɣ ak aššəɣəl ihossayan.»

27 Iṇṇ as Laban: «Oṇsayaq qay a di təqbəla tara nin a: "qam harwa", id tənafləyt in əddəlil nak afəl tat əgrawa, if'ik Məššina albaraka.»

28 Iššewal harwa da, iṇṇ as: «Əfrəs i alxaq nak, ad ak k ərzəma.»

29 Iṇṇ as Yaqub: «Iṃan nak təṣṣana a wa dər ola aššəɣəl wa dak əge, d a wa dər tola təttit n aharay nnak ɣur-i.

30 «Aṃaran təṣṣanaɣ as dat aṣṣa nin təla nnak ši əṇdərrat. Mišan əmərədda təga təttit tagget, issiwar kay Məššina albaraka edagg oṣəɣ. Mišan əmərədda ewad alwaq n ad əšɣəla i tələqqawen in.»

31 Iṇṇ as Laban: «Ma kay z akfa?» Ijjəwwab as Yaqub: «Wər di za takfa wala. Aṃaran ad agla, og̣azaɣ ak eharay nnak as təqbala əššərəd wa dak z aga da.

32 «A di tayya, azalada, ərzəga eharay nnak a daɣ-as d əkkəsa ijamaran kul win šaɣarnen əd win bardaɣnen madeɣ win kawalnen daɣ ayfəd əd sagayan kul win šaɣarnen əd win bardaɣnen daɣ wəlli nnak. Ad əqqəlan alxaqq in.

33 «Dəffər a wa as təššəggaraɣ alxaqq in ad təṣṣənaɣ as nak aw tidət: as təgrawa daɣ aharay nin asagay wər nəšaɣar madeɣ wər nəbardaɣ, madeɣ əjemar wər nəkawal, təṣṣənaɣ as əmikər add əgan.

34 Iṇṇa Laban: «Ənta ddi da! Ardəɣ s a wa təṇṇe.»

35 Mišan əzəl wen da ad iṣkat daɣ aharay-net izulaɣ kul win golənditan əd win bardaɣnen, əd wəlli kul šin šaɣarnen əd šin bardaɣnen, kul a wa əhanat təməllawen daɣ aharay nnet. Iṣkat tolas ayfəd kul šin kawalnen. Ig'en daɣ fassan ən maddan əs.

36 Dəffər a wen issaggalat tan s igəg ən karad aḍan n əšikəl gər essan əd Yaqub. Inəṭṭaf Yaqub d a w a dd iqqiman daɣ aharay ən Laban.

37 Iɣtas-du Yaqub iləgwan win əbdagnen daɣ karad rawan n eškan əṃosnen libne, luz d ermon. Təzzar ig'asan izalwakan mallolnen s əzənzəf.

38 Təzzar iṣṣəns'en daɣ təšəšwit ən təjəngərert ta daɣ iṣṣasu aharay nnet.Amazay wen iṃos wan təməzik ən təntawen-net.

39 Ad əzzagnat əhaṇṇaynat iləgwan win issəṇsa Yaqub, a du tarawnat ikərwatan əganen igolənditan, əd win šaɣarnen əd win bardaɣnen.

40 Iššota Yaqub tolas as izammazay ayfəd, təzzar izzəzak kanat i karran dat šin Laban kawalnen əd šin mallolnen n əlkəzan. Idkal Yaqub maddanəs ən tazzog a, iga sər-san əsəgən.

41 Id əssəbdarnat taɣsiwen šin əngaynen ad assaṇsu dat-əsnat ɣur təšəšwit iləgwan win zalwakan mallolnen fəl ad əzəgnat əhaṇṇaynat tan.

42 Mišan wər tan isəṇsu dat šin ənšašnen əmmək en da as eharay wa inšašan kul iqqal in Laban, wa ingayan il'ay Yaqub

43 Adi da a iknan əsəggərgəs ən Yaqub wəllen, iga daɣ aharay wa ənḍərran isəgan zawwarnen,əd ṃənas dəzdan d eklan əd taklaten.

   

Aus Swedenborgs Werken

 

Arcana Coelestia #3246

studieren Sie diesen Abschnitt

  
/ 10837  
  

3246. And to the sons of the concubines that Abraham had, Abraham gave gifts. That this signifies the spiritual adopted by the Lord’s Divine Human, that they have allotted places in His spiritual kingdom, is evident from the signification of the “sons of the concubines,” as denoting those who are spiritual (concerning whom in what follows); from the representation here of Abraham, as being the Lord’s Divine Human; so that by the words “which Abraham had,” is signified that they (namely, the spiritual) were adopted by the Lord’s Divine Human; and from the signification of the “gifts” which Abraham gave them, as being allotted places in the Lord’s spiritual kingdom.

[2] From what has already been shown in several places (as n. 3235, and elsewhere) concerning those who constitute the Lord’s spiritual kingdom and are called the spiritual, it can be seen that they are not sons born of the marriage itself of good and truth, but of a certain covenant not so conjugial; they are indeed from the same father, but not from the same mother; that is, they are from the same Divine good, but not from the same Divine truth. For as the celestial are from the very marriage of good and truth, they have good and thence truth; wherefore they never inquire what is true, but perceive it from good; and they discourse not about truth beyond affirming that it is so-according to what the Lord teaches in Matthew:

Let your speech be, Yea, yea; Nay, Nay; for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil (Matthew 5:37); whereas the spiritual, because they are from a covenant not so conjugial, do not know from any perception what truth is, but call that true which they have been told to be so by parents and masters; and therefore in them there is not the marriage of good and truth; but still the truth which they thus believe is adopted by the Lord for truth when they are in the good of life (concerning this see n. 1832). Therefore it is that those who are spiritual are here called the “sons of the concubines,” and by these are meant all the sons of Keturah hitherto enumerated, and also the sons of Hagar, who will be named immediately below, from the twelfth to the eighteenth verse.

[3] In former times, in order that both the celestial and the spiritual might be represented in marriages, it was permissible for a man to have a concubine in addition to a wife; such concubine being given to the husband by the wife, and she was then called his “woman,” or was said to be “given to him for a woman,” as when Hagar the Egyptian was given to Abraham by Sarah (Genesis 16:3); when Bilhah the handmaid was given by Rachel to Jacob (Genesis 30:4), and the handmaid Zilpah to Jacob by Leah (Genesis 30:9). They are there called “women,” but elsewhere they are called “concubines,” as Hagar the Egyptian in this verse, and Bilhah in Genesis 35:22, also Keturah herself in 1 Chronicles 1:32.

[4] That those ancients had concubines besides a wife, as was the case not only with Abraham and Jacob, but also with their descendants, as Gideon (Judges 8:31), Saul (2 Samuel 3:7), David (2 Samuel 5:13; 15:16), and Solomon (1 Kings 11:3), was of permission, for the sake of the representation, namely, of the celestial church by a wife, and of the spiritual church by a concubine: this was of permission because they were such that they had no conjugial love, neither was marriage to them marriage, but only a carnal coupling for the sake of procreating offspring. To such there might be permissions without injury to conjugial love, and consequently to its covenant; but never to those who are in good and truth, and who are or can become internal men; for as soon as man is in good and truth, and in things internal, such things cease. For this reason it is not allowable for Christians, as it was for the Jews, to take to themselves a concubine together with a wife, for this is adultery. That the spiritual were adopted by the Lord’s Divine Human, may be seen from what has been stated and shown before on the same subject (n. 2661, 2716, 2833, 2834).

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.