Die Bibel

 

Genesis 26

Lernen

   

2 Inafalal as du Əməli, iṇṇ'as: «Ad wər tərəsa Masar, əɣsər daɣ akal wa dak z əməla.

3 Qam daɣ akal wa da, fəl a daɣ-ak əṣṣəna aga fall-ak albaraka fəlas kay d əzzurriya nnak a z akfaɣ akal a, fəl ad ag̣əzaɣ arkawal wa əgəɣ y abba nnak Ibrahim.

4 Ad əsəffələyləyaɣ əzzurriya nnak šilat n eṭran ən jənnawan, akfaq qu iṃədlan a kul. Šimattiwen n əddənet kul ad əgrəwnat albaraka s əddəlil n əzzurriya nnak.

5 Fəlas Ibrahim iṣṣisam y awal in, iṭṭaf amar in əd tərɣəmt in d əlqanun in.»

6 Iqqim Isxaq daɣ Gərar.

7 As t əggazan meddan n akal šin əṣṣəstan əd təṇtut-net Raqqiyetu iṇṇ'asan: «Tamaḍrayt in a təṃos». Iksud as as iṇṇa taṇtut-net ad t anɣin meddan n akal fəl əddəlil-net, ənta təkna šihussay.

8 Dəffər as iga Isxaq tamert tagget daɣ Gərar, iṣwad du amənokal ən Kəl Filist, əs fənetr inay tu itaggu šeɣat əd taɣurəs Raqqiyetu.

9 Isassaɣr'ay du Abimelek iṇṇ'as: «Zaɣnin taṇtut nak a wa! Mas teṇṇəɣ tamaḍrayt nak a təṃos?» Ijjəwwab as Isxaq: «Təṇṇa a əgeɣ adi fəl təksəda n ad ətəwənɣa fəl əddəlil-net».

10 Iṇṇ'as Abimelek: «Ma dana təgeɣ da?» Azzama inamanṣa iyyan daɣ meddan nana əd təṇtut nak iməl ɣur-ək as nakkanay inasbakkadan».

11 Omar Abimelek tamattay kul iṇṇa: «Wa iḍasan aləs a əd təṇtut-net a das tətəwəxkəm taṃattant».

12 Igyak Isxaq daɣ akal wa təzzar olay du awatay wədi ṭemeday n əṇətfus n a wa igyak fəlas Əməli a fall-as igan albaraka.

13 Iqqal Isxaq aləs ilan təkarzay tagget har ikna təgərgist wəllen.

14 Ila eharay wa ənḍarran əd wa zəwwaran d eklan aggotnen.Təzzar əmmənzaɣan tu Kəl Filist.

15 Adi da fəl əṇbalan eṇwan kul win əɣazan eklan n Ibrahim, daɣ azzaman-net, əṭkaran tan aṃadal.

16 Təzzar iṇkar Abimelek iṇṇa y Isxaq: «Əbdəd ugag ana fəlas šigrat a dana təge».

17 Iggəlat Isxaq izzəbbat daɣ əɣlal wa n Gərar denda ad iɣsar.

18 Ibrahim daɣ azzaman-net iɣaz eṇwan. Dəffər iba-net əṇbalan tan Kəl Filist. Ilas Isxaq iɣaz eṇwan win, ig'asan iṣmawan win da a dasan iga abba nnet.

19 Əɣazan eklan n Isxaq aṇu daɣ əɣlal tolas, əgrawan daɣ-as ṣhat n aṃan təddarat.

20 Ad əgammayan maḍanan ən Gərar əkənnas daɣ win Isxaq, əṇnan asan: «Aṇu nnana a wa» Adi da fəl iga Isxaq y aṇu eṣəm Eseq(əkənnas) fəlas əkənnas a fall-as əgan.

21 Əɣazan eklan-net aṇu iyyan as ənta da iga fall-as əkənnas təzzar ig'as eṣəm Sitna (gezzar).

22 Iggəlat Isxaq əddi iɣaz aṇu iyyan wa fəl wər z' ag'əkənnas maran ig'as eṣəm Rəxobot (tənaflit) fəlas iṇṇa: «Əməli əmərədda isannaflay ana ikf'ana təkarzay daɣ akal a.»

23 Den da ad ikka Ber-Šeba.

24 Ahad wen da a das d'inafalal Əməli iṇṇ'as: «Nak Məššina n abba nnak Ibrahim. A kay wər təggəz ṭasa fəlas nak əṣṣana daɣ-ak. A fall-ak ag'albaraka, əsəffələyləya əzzurriya nnak fəlas əgəɣ arkawal y əkli nin Ibrahim».

25 Den da ad ikras Isxaq edag ən təkutay ad iɣabbad Əməli. Ikras daɣ akal wen ahaket-net. Əɣazan daɣ-as eklan-net aṇu.

26 Əzəl iyyan Abimelek ifal du Gərar iggədaz d Isxaq iddəw d Axuzzut, əməššewwər-net, əd Fikol əmuzar ən nammagaran-net.

27 Iṇṇ'asan Isxaq: «Ma sər-i du tədagam təgzaram i, təstaɣam i du ɣur-wan?»

28 Əjjəwwaban as: «Aššak a nəkkas as iṣṣan daɣ-ak Əməli. Adi da a fəl nənamaṇṇa; Təməlet tu tassaq gar-ena dər-ək, nənəməgget arkawal dər-ək.

29 Daɣ əddəlil n ad tətkəlaɣ əlwaši n as wər dana za təɣšəda arat əmmək as wər dak nəɣšed arat, nəg'ak iḍuf olaɣan nəssoɣal kay akal nak s alxer. Illikan as iga fall-ak Əməli əmərədda albaraka nnet.

30 Ig'asan Isxaq əsəmməguri olaɣan ətšan əšwan.

31 Əgan du taṇakra tənzayat ənamasaḍafan arkawal. Intak kan Isxaq əglan əfalan tu s alxer.

32 Əzəl wen da oṣan t'idu eklan-net Isxaq ewayan as du isalan n aṇu wa əɣzan əṇṇan as: «Nəgraw daɣ-as aṃan».

33 Ig'as Isxaq eṣəm Šiba (tassaq). Adi da a fəl itawagga y əɣrəm wa eṣəm Ber-Šeba(aṇu ən tassaq) har azala.

34 Esaw iga əkkozat təṃərwen n awatay as izlaf ṣanatat təḍoden daɣ Kəl Xiti əṃosnen Yudit elles ən Beri əd Basmat elles n Elon.

35 Šiḍoden šin əssiknanat Isxaq əd Raqqiyetu arkaṇay.

   

Aus Swedenborgs Werken

 

Arcana Coelestia #3438

studieren Sie diesen Abschnitt

  
/ 10837  
  

3438. 'Jehovah appeared to him that night, and said' means the Lord's perception regarding that obscurity. This is clear from the meaning of 'Jehovah's appearing and saying' - when it has reference to the Lord - as perceiving from the Divine ('Jehovah's appearing to him' is perception from the Divine, see 3367, and 'laying' is perceiving, 2862, 3395. For Jehovah was within Him, and so long as the Human was not yet glorified, Jehovah's 'appearing' was a Divine perception - or perception from the Divine. Therefore 'Jehovah's appearing to him and saying' has this meaning of perceiving from the Divine); and from the meaning of 'night' as a state of shade or obscurity, dealt with in 1712. By that obscurity is meant the literal sense of the Word, for the relationship of that sense to the internal sense is that of shade to light.

[2] To enable people to have a clearer knowledge of what the situation is with the literal sense of the Word, let this be discussed briefly: The relationship of the internal sense to the literal is like the relationship between the interiors and the exteriors of the human being, that is, between all that is celestial or spiritual in him and all that is natural or bodily. His interiors dwell in the light of heaven, but his exteriors in the light of the world. For the nature of the difference between the light of heaven and the light of the world, consequently for the difference between things belonging to the light of heaven and those belonging to the light of the world, see 1521-1533, 1619-1632, 1783, 1880, 2776, 3138, 3167, 3190, 3195, 3222, 3223, 3225, 3337, 3339, 3341, 3413. That is to say, the difference is like that existing between the light of day and the shade of night. Since man dwells in that shade and does not wish to know that truth from the Lord has light within it he inevitably believes that his shade is light, and indeed the reverse also - that his light is shade. For he is like the owl which, when flying in the shade of night, imagines it is in the light, but when flying in the light of day imagines it is in the shade. Indeed the internal eye - that is, the understanding - by means of which a person sees interiorly, assumes no other shape with someone like that, such being exactly how he has shaped it. For he opens it when he looks downwards, that is, to worldly and bodily things, and shuts it when he looks upwards, that is, to spiritual and celestial. With these people it is similar with the Word. That which appears in its literal sense they imagine to belong to the light but that which appears in the internal sense they imagine to belong to the shade. For how the Word appears to anyone depends on his own essential nature. In reality the internal sense of the Word in relation to its literal sense is like the light of heaven to the light of the world, 3086, 3108, that is, it is like the light of day to the light of night.

[3] Within the internal sense there are individual details, millions of which together constitute one particular feature that occurs in the literal sense. Or what amounts to the same, within the internal sense there exist particular features, millions of which together constitute just one general whole that occurs in the literal sense. This general whole is what is seen by man, but not the particular features which are present within it and which constitute it. Nevertheless man can see within the general whole the order that holds the particular features together, though he sees it according to his own essential nature. That order is the holiness which stirs his affections.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.