Die Bibel

 

Genesis 18

Lernen

   

2 As idkal Ibrahim aṣawad-net ogga karad meddan əbdadan dat-əs. Ozal-in dat ahaket-net har dər-san iṃṃənay, issəjad har aṃadal.

3 Aṃaran iṇṇa: «Əməli-nin kud əgrawa ɣur-ək arraxmat ad wər takəya daɣ igəg n əkli-nnak.

4 Ammawayanet-awan-du arat n aṃan as təššoradam iḍaran-nawan. Dəffər a di taṣṣanfim daw ašəkk a.

5 A-kawan-akfa arat ən ṭattay a-kawan-du-təssuɣəl šiɣurad-nawan, aṃaran takəyam daɣ tarrayt-nawan. S ig'a di wər z-iqqəl as du-təllamam dagma n ahan-in bannan.» Əjjəwwaban-as magaran: «Agu a w'as təṇṇe!»

6 Iqqal Ibrahim ahaket-net irrorad, iṇṇa i Sarata: «Tarmad, ədkəl-du iyyat n əɣlal n agel-nam w'ofan taga šigəlwen.

7 Dəffər a wen ozal Ibrahim s aharay-nnet isaṇṇafran d abarkaw wa ləmmidan iddəren, ikf-ay y amaššaɣal-net, issətrab amaknaw-net.

8 Aṃaran idkal-du ṭawna d əx d abarkaw wa iŋŋan, issəṇs-en dat-san. Igla ibdad ɣur-san daw ašək, əṭattan.

9 Təzzar əṇṇan-as: «Ma təga Sarata ta n tənṭut-nak?» Ijjəwwab-asan: «Təlla da, təha aṃṃas n ahaket.»

10 Iṇṇa iyyan daɣ-san: «Illikan as a-kay-d-əqqəla aḍan a da azanen, ad-tilu tənṭut-nak Sarata barar.» Sarata təṣṣisam daɣ aṃṃas n ahaket-net illan dəffər Ibrahim.

11 Ibrahim əd Sarata əglan daɣ elan, amaran Sarata təsiɣaraggat.

12 Ad-təḍazzu daɣ ṃan-net. Təgannu: «Əmərədda ad waššera ad-ileɣ əṇṇiyat n ənəməṇsa? Aləs-in deɣ waššar.»

13 Iṇṇa Əməli y Ibrahim: «Mas təḍazzu Sarata, təgannu:" Immikkan as ad əgrəwa barar, nak igan tušaray a da?"

14 Illa-ttu a iṃosan muxal fəl Əməli? Daɣ tamert a dak-əssəbdada a-kay-d-aṣa, aṃaran daɣ tamert di Sarata təla barar.»

15 Təga Sarata bahu as təṇṇa: «Wər əḍze», ənta tərəmmeq a təga. Mišan iṇṇ-as Əməli: «Awalla təḍzə!»

16 Əggazan meddan tarrayt, əgan anamod ən Sədom har oggan aɣrəm-net, intak-kan Ibrahim.

17 «Awak, iṇṇa Əməli, ad-əɣbəra y Ibrahim a wa z-aga?

18 Illikan as Ibrahim ad-iqqəl əmaraw ən tamattay təknat igət, təkna aṣṣahat, amaran a sər-əs əgrəwnat təmattiwen kul n əddənet albaraka,

19 fəlas əsinafranaq-qu fəl ad-amər əzzurriya-nnet s iḍuf ən tarrayen-nin s əṇṇiyat togdat toɣad fəl a-das-assanda a wa das ərkawala.

20 Iṇṇa Əməli y Ibrahim: «Šiɣəttas ən Sədom əd Gamora šilabasnen, ibakkadan-nasan izawwarnen,

21 a-tan-awəda aššaggara a wa sər-san itawaṇṇan. Kud əgan aššar wədi, ad-əṣṣəna.»

22 Əššin daɣ magaran əg̣madan edag di, əgan anamod ən Sədom, s iga a di Əməli illa ɣur Ibrahim.

23 Ihoz-t-id Ibrahim, iṇṇa: «Əməli, awak ad-təhləka aytedan win n alɣadilan əd win tan wər nəṃos?

24 Mijas əllanat-tu ṣəmmosat təṃərwen n alɣadil daɣ əɣrəm a-tan-təhləka? Wər za-təṣṣurəfa y əɣrəm fəl udəm ən ṣəmmosat təṃərwen as immikkan as t-əhanat?

25 Kala kala wər imməkkan ad-tagaɣ a di, ad-tanɣa aytedan əɣdalnen təssərtəyaq-qan əd win aššarnen, əšəššili ən win əɣdalnen əd win aššarnen! Iguk-kay əṃedran di! Əmašraɣ n əddənet ad-ammazal s əššəriɣa di?»

26 Iṇṇa Əməli: «As əgrawa daɣ Sədom ṣəmmosat təṃərwen n alɣadil, ad-əṣṣurəfa y əɣrəm kul fəl udəm-nasan.»

27 Iṇṇa Ibrahim tolas: «Əhala awal s Əməli, ənta nak wər əṃosa ar əg̣odrar d ezəd.

28 Kud iqqəddar as aba ṣəmmos daɣ ṣəmmosat təṃərwen n alɣadil ad-təhləka aɣrəm kul fəl ṣəmmos aytedan di?» «Wər tu-z-əhləka, ijjəwwab Əməli, as daɣ-as əgrawa əkkozat təṃərwen n alɣadil əd ṣəmmos.»

29 Iḍgaz Ibrahim tolas iṇṇa: «Mijas tu wər iha ar əkkozat təṃərwen n alɣadil!» «Wər z-əhləka aɣrəm fəl udəm n əkkozat təṃərwen.»

30 Iṇṇa Ibrahim tolas: «Əməli-nin ardu s a kay wər iggez alham, ad-ak-ammagrada tolas! Mijas tu wər iha ar karadat təṃərwen.» «As daɣ-as əgrawa karadat təṃərwen, ijjawwab Əməli, wər tu-z-aga.»

31 Igla Ibrahim iṣṣəstan: «Əhala awal s Əməli. Mijas wər t-iha ar ṣanatat təṃərwen!» «Fəl udəm ən ṣanatat təṃərwen di wər tu-z-əhləka.»

32 Iṇṇa Ibrahim tolas: «Are daɣ Əməli a tu wər iggez alham as əge awal-in wa ilkaman! Mijas tu wər iha ar ṃaraw.» Amaran ijjəwwab Məššina: «Fəl udəm ən ṃaraw alɣadilan wər z-əhləka aɣrəm di.»

33 As təɣrad əljəmat fəl a wa, igl'Əməli, aṃaran Ibrahim iqqal aɣaywan-net.

   

Aus Swedenborgs Werken

 

Arcana Coelestia #2269

studieren Sie diesen Abschnitt

  
/ 10837  
  

2269. And He said, I will not destroy it if I find there forty and five. That this signifies that man should not perish if good and truth could be conjoined together, is evident from the signification of the number forty-five, as being conjunction. It has been already shown that the simple numbers retain their signification even when they are multiplied; and that consequently the greater numbers have a signification similar to that of the less; and such is the case with forty-five, which number is compounded by the multiplication of five into nine; and as it has been compounded by the multiplication of five into nine, it has the same signification as have “five” and “nine.” That “five” signifies a little, was shown above (n. 649), and that “nine” signifies conjunction, or what is conjoined (n. 2075); and thus the signification here is: If goods have in some measure been conjoined with truths. That in the Word numbers signify actual things, or states, is evident from what was said about fifty (n. 2252); also from what has been shown before concerning numbers (n. 482, 487, 575, 647, 648, 755, 813, 1963, 1988).

[2] It is because “five” signifies a little, and “forty-five” conjunction, that the very setting forth of these numbers in this verse is of such a nature, for it is said, “Peradventure there shall lack five of the fifty righteous;” and by this is signified, If there should be somewhat less; and then it is said, “Wilt Thou destroy all the city for five?” by which is signified, Shall they perish for the little which is wanting? For as “five” signifies a little, this number is not employed again, but it is said, “I will not destroy it if I find there forty and five;” by which is signified that they would not perish if good and truth could be conjoined together. The reason also of its being said here “forty and five,” and not “if there lack five of fifty,” is because “five” not only signifies a little (as was shown, n. 649), but also signifies disjunction (as was likewise shown in volume 1, n. 1686); and therefore in order that not disjunction, but conjunction, might be signified, this number forty-five is named; for “forty-five” denotes some conjunction, as stated above; and thus in the internal sense all things follow on in a beautiful sequence Of their own.

[3] As regards the conjunction of good with truth, it is an arcanum which cannot be described so that it can be grasped by the ordinary comprehension. It must be told in a few words. The more genuine and pure the truth, the better can the good which is from the Lord be adapted into it as its recipient vessel; but the less genuine and pure the truth, the less can the good which is from the Lord be adapted into it; for they must correspond to each other, and the conjunction of the two is effected according to the correspondence. Goods cannot possibly be insinuated into falsities, nor evils into truths, as their recipient vessels; for they are of a contrary character and nature, the one casting out the other as its enemy; nay, should they attempt to conjoin themselves together, the one would spew out the other, that is to say, good would spew out evil as if it were poison, and evil would spew out good as if it were an emetic. Such enmity between good and evil has been provided by the Lord in order to prevent the possibility of their being commingled, for if they were commingled, the man would perish. In the deceitful and in hypocrites they are not far from being conjoined together, but still precautions are taken by the Lord in order to prevent their being so conjoined. This is the reason why in the other life those who are deceitful and those who are hypocrites suffer things more direful than those which are suffered by any others.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.