Die Bibel

 

Genesis 16

Lernen

   

2 Təṇṇa Saray y Abram: «Azzama Əməli igdal-i ad-arəwa wədi aglu nəməṇsu əd təklitt-in mijas a sər-əs əgrəwa barar.» Ird'Abram əstaṇat ən Saray.

3 Tədkal Saray taklit-net Hajara ta n wəllət Maṣar, təkf-et y Abram aləs-net, ig-et daɣ ahan, dəffər as iga ṃaraw elan iɣsar daɣ akal wa n Kanan.

4 Inamaṇsa dər-əs təga tadist. As təṣṣan as təga tadist abas təssəfrar ṃass-as.

5 Təzzar təṇṇa Saray y Abram: «Kay a fəl z-iqqəl iba ən tidət wa di itawaggan! Nak iṃan-in as əgeɣ taklitt-in gər fassan-nak, əmərədda ad təga tadist aṃaran abas di-təssəfrar. Išrəɣetana Əməli nak dər-ək!»

6 Ijjəwwab Abram i Saray iṇṇ-as: «Taklit-nam ifassan-nam a gər təlla, ag-as a w'as təṇṇeɣ olaɣ.» Təzzar təg-as Saray tarnəṭṭuft, təḍḍəggag Hajara təgguk-kat.

7 Oṣ-et du Angalos n Əməli, təlla dagm'ən šaṭ n aṃan iyyat daɣ taṇeray, ta təhat tarrayt n əɣrəm ən Šur.

8 Iṇṇ-as: «Hajara taklit ən Saray mənis du-təhe? mənis tədaga?» Təjjəwwab təṇṇ-as: «Əḍəggəg a əgeɣ fəl Saray, ṃass-i.»

9 Iṇṇ-as Angalos n Əməli: «Əqqəl maṣṣ-am tassaṇsaɣ-as.»

10 Iṇṇ-as tolas: «Ad-əsəffələyləya əzzurriya-nnam wəllen haras wər z-itəwəfrəg ətəwəšiḍən-net fəl igət.»

11 Ilas Angalos n Əməli iṇṇ-as: «Kam da təgat tadist da, ad-təgrəwa barar tagaɣ-as eṣəm Ismaɣil fəlas Əməli a islan i təkurayt-nam.

12 Aṃaran barar-nam ad-iqqəl šilat n ajad n əṣuf. Ad-itamagar d aytedan kul, ətamagaran dər-əs, iwər aganna daɣ məḍrayan-net kul.»

13 Təɣra Əməli a das iššewalan s eṣəm n Atta-El-Roy (almaɣna-nnet: təṃosa Məššina wa di ihaṇṇayan), fəlas təṇṇa: «Awak wərge da da ad-ənaya wa di ihaṇṇayan?»

14 A di da a fəl itawagga y aṇu wa eṣəm Ber-Laxay-Roy (almaɣna-net aṇu ən wa iddaran wa d-i- ihaṇṇayan), aṇu illan gər Kadeš əd Bered.

15 Teraw Hajara barar n Abram, ig-as eṣəm Ismaɣil.

16 Abram iga əṭṭamat təṃərwen n awatay əd ṣədis as igraw əd Hajara Ismaɣil.

   

Aus Swedenborgs Werken

 

Arcana Coelestia #1953

studieren Sie diesen Abschnitt

  
/ 10837  
  

1953. And she called the name of Jehovah who was speaking unto her. That this signifies the state of the Lord’s interior man when it thought about these things, is evident from what precedes and what follows, and also from the signification of “calling a name,” which is to know what is the quality (explained before, n. 144, 145, 1754). This state is described in regard to its quality, or the state in which the Lord was when He thus thought about the rational. The rational could not think this, but the interior or higher man could (spoken of before, n. 1926). For the rational can by no means think about itself in regard to its quality, for nothing can look into itself; but it must be something more internal or higher that thinks about it, for this can look into it. For example: the ear cannot know, and still less perceive the speech that it receives into itself: this is done by a more interior hearing. The ear merely discerns articulate sounds or words: it is the interior hearing that apprehends what is said, and then it is an interior sight or mental view that perceives it, and in this way there is through the hearing a perception of the meaning of the speech. The case is similar with the things of sight: the first ideas received from the objects of sight are material, as they are also called; but there is a sight still more interior that views the objects mentally, and thereby thinks. And such is the case with man’s rational. The rational can by no means look into itself, still less explore its own quality: there must be something more internal that does this; and therefore when a man is able to do it-that is, perceive anything false in his rational, or any truth that shines there, and especially if he is able to perceive anything that is battling and overcoming-he may know that his ability to do this comes from the Lord’s influx through the internal man. The Lord’s interior man, spoken of above (n. 1926) and meant here, was that which had been conjoined with His internal man, which was Jehovah, and was therefore far above that rational. From that interior man, as in celestial light, He saw and perceived of what quality the rational would become if it were in truth alone, and not in good.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.