Die Bibel

 

创世记 34

Lernen

   

1 利亚给雅各所生的女儿底拿出去,要见那的女子们。

2 的主─希未人、哈抹的儿子示剑见他,就拉住他,与他行淫,玷辱他。

3 示剑的系恋雅各的女儿底拿,喜这女子,甜言蜜语地安慰他。

4 示剑对他父亲哈抹:求你为我聘这女子为妻。

5 雅各见示剑玷污了他的女儿底拿。那时他的儿子们正和群畜在田野,雅各就闭口不言,等他们回

6 示剑的父亲哈抹出来见雅各,要和他商议。

7 雅各的儿子们见这事,就从田野回,人人忿恨,十分恼怒;因示剑在以色列家作了丑事,与雅各的女儿行淫,这本是不该做的事。

8 哈抹和他们商议:我儿子示剑的心恋慕这女子,求你们将他我的儿子为妻。

9 你们与我们彼此结亲;你们可以把女儿我们,也可以娶我们女儿

10 你们与我们罢!这都在你们面前,只管在此居住,做买卖,置产业。

11 示剑对女儿的父亲弟兄们:但愿我在你们眼前蒙恩,你们向我要甚麽,我必你们。

12 任凭向我要多重的聘金和礼物,我必照你们所你们;只要把女子我为妻。

13 雅各的儿子们因为示剑玷污了他们的妹子底拿,就用诡诈的话回答示剑和他父亲哈抹,

14 对他们我们不能把我们的妹子没有受割礼的人为妻,因为那是我们的羞辱。

15 惟有一件才可以应允:若你们所有的男丁都受割礼,和我们一样,

16 我们就把女儿你们,也娶你们的女儿我们便与你们同,两下成为样的人民。

17 倘若你们不我们割礼我们就带着妹子走了。

18 哈抹和他的儿子示剑喜欢这

19 那少年人做这事并不迟延,因为他喜爱雅各的女儿;他在他父亲家中也是人最尊重的。

20 哈抹和他儿子示剑到本城的门口,对本城的人

21 这些人与我们和睦,不如许他们在这居住,做买卖;这也宽阔,足可容下他们。我们可以娶他们的女儿为妻,也可以把我们女儿他们。

22 惟有件事我们必须做,他们才肯应允和我们,成为样的人民:就是我们中间所有的男丁都要受割礼,和他们样。

23 他们的群畜、货财,和一切的牲口岂不都归我们麽?只要依从他们,他们就与我们

24 凡从城出入的人就都从哈抹和他儿子示剑的话;於是凡从城出入的男丁都受了割礼

25 第三,众正在疼痛的时候,雅各的两个儿子,就是底拿的哥哥西缅和利未,各拿刀,趁着众想不到的时候到城中,把一切杀了,

26 又用刀杀了哈抹和他儿子示剑,把底拿从示剑家里带出来就走了。

27 雅各的儿子们因为他们的妹子受了玷污,就被杀的人那里,掳掠那城,

28 夺了他们的羊群牛群,和,并城里田间所有的;

29 又把他们一切货财、孩子、妇女,并各房中所有的,都掳掠去了。

30 雅各西缅和利未:你们连累我,使我在这居民中,就是在迦南人和比利洗人中,有了名。我的人丁既然稀少,他们必聚集来击杀我,我和全家的人都必灭绝。

31 他们:他岂可待我们的妹子如同妓女麽?

   

Aus Swedenborgs Werken

 

Arcana Coelestia #4493

studieren Sie diesen Abschnitt

  
/ 10837  
  

4493. 'And they circumcised every male, all who went out of the gate of his city' means the acceptance of externalities. This is clear from the meaning of 'circumcising every male' as being introduced into the representatives and meaningful signs of that people (that is, into those of Jacob's descendants) - solely into the external observances involved in these, dealt with in 4486; and from the meaning of 'going out of the gate of the city' as departing from the doctrine of the Church among the Ancients, dealt with immediately above in 4492. And as the departure from doctrine and the acceptance of externalities is meant, the expression 'those who went out of the gate of his city' occurs twice, without any reference at the same time, as is so elsewhere, to those who went into it. For 'going in' means an acceptance of doctrine and a departure from externalities; but the reverse of this is described here.

[2] The implications of this must now be stated. Members of the Most Ancient Church, the remnants of which Hamor and Shechem with their families were a part, had an entirely different mental constitution and different disposition from adherents to the Ancient Church. The will in the case of the members of the Most Ancient Church contained that which was whole; but this was not so with adherents to the Ancient Church. Because of this the Lord was able with members of the Most Ancient Church to flow in through the will, and therefore by an internal way, but not so with adherents to the Ancient Church, since in these the will had been destroyed. But the Lord flowed into their understanding, and so not by an internal way but by an external one, as stated above in 4489. Flowing in through the will involves flowing in through the good of love, for all good belongs to the will part of the mind, whereas flowing in through the understanding involves flowing in through the truth of faith, for all truth belongs to the understanding part. Within the latter - the understanding - the Lord formed, in the case of adherents to the Ancient Church, a new will when He regenerated them. For goods and truths were implanted in the will part of the mind of members of the Most Ancient Church, see 895, 927, but in the understanding part of that of adherents to the Ancient Church, 863, 875, 895, 927, 2124, 2256, 4328. The new will is formed within the understanding part of the mind, 928, 1023, 1043, 1044, 4328. A parallelism exists between the Lord and the good residing with man, but not between Him and the truth there, 1831, 1832, 2718, 3514. As a consequence adherents to the Ancient Church dwelt in obscurity compared with members of the Most Ancient, 2708, 2715, 2935, 2937, 3246, 3833. From all this it may be seen that members of the Most Ancient Church had an entirely different mental constitution and different disposition from adherents to the Ancient Church.

[3] It was for this reason that those who belonged to the Most Ancient Church were internal people and had no external forms of worship, while those who belonged to the Ancient Church were external people and did have them. For the former saw external things in the light of internal ones, as if by the light of the sun in the daytime, whereas the latter saw internal things in the light of external ones, as if by the light of the moon or stars at night. This also explains why the Lord is seen by the former in heaven as the Sun, but by the latter as the Moon, 1521, 1529-1531, 2441, 2495, 4060. The former are those who in explanations above are called celestial, the latter those who are called spiritual.

[4] To illustrate the essential difference between the two let an example be taken. If a member of the Most Ancient Church had read the Word, the historical or the prophetical, he would have seen its internal sense without prior instruction or any explanation. He would have seen it so perfectly that the celestial and spiritual things belonging to the internal sense would have instantly met his eyes, and scarcely anything belonging to the sense of the letter. Thus the internal sense would have been for him in brightness, but the sense of the letter in obscurity. He would be like someone listening to a person speaking, and taking in only the sense and paying no attention to the words used by the speaker. But if a member of the Ancient Church had read the Word he would not have been able, without prior instruction or explanation, to see its internal sense, and so the internal sense would have been for him in obscurity but the sense of the letter in brightness. He would be like someone listening to a person speaking and in thought hanging on to the words used by him, all the while paying no attention to the sense of them, which would therefore be lost on him. But when a member of the Jewish Church reads the Word he does not understand anything beyond the sense of the letter. He does not know of and also denies the existence of any internal sense. And it is similar with the member of the Christian Church at the present day.

[5] These considerations show the essential difference between those represented here by Hamor and Shechem who, being part of the remnants of the Most Ancient Church, were interested in internal things and not in external ones, and those meant by the sons of Jacob who were interested in external things and not in internal ones. Those considerations show in addition that Hamor and Shechem could not have acceded to external things and accepted those which existed among the sons of Jacob unless their internals were closed. But if these had been closed they would have perished for ever.

[6] This is the hidden reason why Hamor and Shechem with their families were slain, a deed that would not otherwise have been allowed. Not that this absolves the sons of Jacob from blame for having committed that hideous crime. They had no knowledge of that hidden reason, nor did they have that as their end in view. Everyone is judged according to the end he has in view, that is, his intention; and it is plainly stated in verse 13 that their intention was deceitful. When the Lord allows any such crime as this it is carried out by the evil and by those in hell who instigate it. But all evil which the evil intend and do to the good the Lord converts into good, as is the case here in that Hamor and Shechem with their families were [eternally] saved.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.