Die Bibel

 

创世记 21

Lernen

   

1 耶和华按着先前的话眷顾撒拉,便照他所的给撒拉成就。

2 亚伯拉罕年老的时候,撒拉怀了孕;到的日期,就给亚伯拉罕生了一个儿子

3 亚伯拉罕给撒拉所生的儿子起名以撒

4 以撒生下来第八日,亚伯拉罕照着所吩咐的,给以撒行了割礼

5 儿子以撒生的时候,亚伯拉罕年一岁。

6 撒拉使我喜笑,凡见的必与我一同喜笑;

7 :谁能预先对亚伯拉罕撒拉要养婴孩呢?因为在他年老的时候,我给他生了一个儿子

8 孩子渐长,就断了奶。以撒断奶的日子,亚伯拉罕设摆丰盛的筵席。

9 当时,撒拉见埃及人夏甲给亚伯拉罕所生的儿子戏笑,

10 就对亚伯拉罕:你把这使女和他儿子赶出去!因为这使女的儿子不可与我的儿子以撒一同承受产业。

11 亚伯拉罕因他儿子的缘故很忧愁。

12 亚伯拉罕:你不必为这童子和你的使女忧愁。凡撒拉对你的话,你都该从;因为从以撒生的,才要称为你的後裔。

13 至於使女的儿子,我也必使他的後裔成立一国,因为他是你所生的。

14 亚伯拉罕起来,拿饼和一皮袋了夏甲,搭在他的肩上,又把孩子交他,打发他走。夏甲就走了,在别是巴的旷野走迷了路。

15 皮袋的用尽了,夏甲就把孩子撇在小树底

16 自己走开约有一箭之远,相对而:我不忍见孩子,就相对而,放声大哭。

17 见童子的声音的使者从呼叫夏甲:夏甲,你为何这样呢?不要害怕已经见童子的声音了。

18 起来!把童子抱在怀(原文作)中,我必使他的後裔成为国。

19 使夏甲的眼睛明亮,他就见一口,便去将皮袋盛满了,给童子喝。

20 保佑童子,他就渐长,旷野,成了弓箭手。

21 在巴兰的旷野;他母亲埃及给他娶了一个妻子

22 当那时候,亚比米勒同他军长非各对亚伯拉罕:凡你所行的事都有的保佑。

23 我愿你如今在这里指着对我起誓,不要欺负我与我的儿子,并我的子孙。我怎样厚待了你,你也要照样厚待我与你所寄居这的民。

24 亚伯拉罕:我情愿起誓。

25 从前,亚比米勒的仆人霸占了一口亚伯拉罕为这事指责亚比米勒。

26 亚比米勒:谁做这事,我不知道,你也没有告诉我,今日我才见了。

27 亚伯拉罕和牛了亚比米勒,人就彼此立约。

28 亚伯拉罕只母羔另放在一处。

29 亚比米勒问亚伯拉罕:你把这只母羊羔另放在一处,是甚麽意思呢?

30 :你要从我里受这只母羊羔,作我这口的证据。

31 所以他给那地方起名别是巴,因为他们人在那里起了誓。(别是巴就是盟誓的井的意思)

32 他们在别是巴立了约,亚比米勒就同他军长非各起身回非利士去了。

33 亚伯拉罕在别是巴栽上一棵垂丝柳树,又在那里求告耶和华─永生神的名。

34 亚伯拉罕非利士人寄居了多日。

   

Aus Swedenborgs Werken

 

Arcana Coelestia #2718

studieren Sie diesen Abschnitt

  
/ 10837  
  

2718. 'A wife from the land of Egypt' means the affection for knowledge, which the member of the spiritual Church possesses. This is clear from the meaning of 'a wife' as affection or good, dealt with in 915, 2517, and from the meaning of 'Egypt' as knowledge, dealt with in 1164, 1165, 1186, 1462. In this verse the member of the spiritual Church is described so far as the nature of his good, that is, the essence of his life, is concerned - that the good residing with him is obscure, but that it is brightened with light from the Lord's Divine Human. From that brightening of it the affection for truth arises in the rational part of his mind, and the affection for knowledge in the natural part. The reason the affection for good such as resides within the celestial man cannot arise in the spiritual man, but instead the affection for truth, is that the good residing with him is implanted in the understanding part of his mind, and is obscure compared with the celestial man's good, as shown in 2715. From this good no other type of affection can be generated and derived within his rational than the affection for truth, and through this affection for truth the affection for knowledge within the natural. No other truth is meant in this case than that which the person believes to be the truth, even though it may not in itself be the truth. Nor is knowledge used to mean such knowledge as the learned possess but all factual knowledge with which a person can be taught from what he experiences or hears in everyday life, from doctrine, and from the Word. It is the affection for such truth and knowledge that exists within the member of the spiritual Church.

[2] So that it may be known what is meant by the affection for truth existing with someone and what by the affection for good, let a brief statement be made regarding them. Those with the affection for truth think about, question, and discuss whether a thing is true, whether it is so. And when they are convinced it is true, or is so, they think about, question, and discuss what it is. Thus they remain rooted on the doorstep and cannot be admitted into wisdom until they no longer have any doubts. Those however with whom the affection for good exists know and perceive that the thing is so from the good itself governing them. Thus they do not remain on the doorstep but are in a room inside, having been admitted into wisdom.

[3] Take as an example the consideration that it is a celestial gift to think and to act from an affection for good, or from good. Those with whom the affection for truth exists discuss whether this is so, whether such a gift can exist, and what it may be. And so long as they are turning over doubts about it they are unable to be admitted. But those with the affection for good do not discuss or turn doubts over but assert that the thing is true and are for that reason admitted. For those with whom the affection for good exists, that is, those who are celestial, start off where those with the affection for truth, that is, those who are spiritual, come to a halt, so that the furthest point reached by the latter is the starting point for the former. That being so, those who are celestial are given to know, recognize, and perceive that affections for good are countless - as numerous as the communities in heaven - and that they are all joined together by the Lord into a heavenly form so as to constitute one human being so to speak. They are also given to define by perception the genus and species to which each affection belongs.

[4] Or take this example: All delight, blessedness, and happiness belong wholly to love, but the nature of the love determines that of the delight, blessedness, and happiness. The spiritual man fixes his mind on the question whether this is true and whether delight, blessedness, and happiness may not spring from some other source, such as from mixing with others, talking to others, meditation, or learning, and also whether they reside in possessions, position, reputation, and the glory resulting from these. As long as he is asking such questions he does not confirm himself in the truth that none of these accomplishes anything, only the affection born of love which is present within them and making them what they are. The celestial man however does not remain rooted in such preliminary questionings but immediately asserts that the thing is true. Consequently he is interested in the end in view and the realization of this, that is, he is governed by the very affections born of love which are countless, and in each one of which there are things beyond description, involving variations of delight, blessedness, and happiness that have no end.

[5] Take as a further example the consideration that the neighbour is to be loved for the good that resides with him. Those with whom the affection for truth exists think, question, and discuss whether this is true, that is, whether it is so. They ask what the neighbour is, what good is; but they go no further than this, and therefore they shut the door to wisdom against themselves. Those however with the affection for good assert that the thing is so and do not consequently shut the door against themselves but enter in and so come to know, recognize, and perceive from good who is pre-eminently the neighbour, also in what degree he is the neighbour, and that everyone in differing ways is the neighbour. Thus they perceive things beyond description, over and above what is known to those with the affection solely for truth.

[6] Take as yet another example the truth that a person who loves the neighbour for the good within him loves the Lord. Those with the affection for truth question whether this is so. And if they are told that anyone who loves the neighbour for the good within him loves the good, and that - since all good comes from the Lord and the Lord is present in good - when anyone loves good he also loves the Lord from whom that good comes and in which He is present, they then question whether that too is so. They also ask what loving good is, as well as what good is, and whether the Lord is present more so in good than in truth. As long as they remain rooted in such questionings they cannot get even a distant view of wisdom. But those with the affection for good know from perception that the thing is so and immediately behold the whole field of wisdom leading right on to the Lord.

[7] From these examples it may become clear why in comparison with those who have the affection for good, that is, with those who are celestial, obscurity exists with those who have the affection for truth, that is, with those who are spiritual Nevertheless the latter are able to pass from obscurity into light, provided that they are willing to adopt the affirmative attitude that all good belongs to love to the Lord and charity towards the neighbour; also that love and charity constitute spiritual conjunction, and that these are the source of all blessedness and happiness, thus that heavenly life consists in the good belonging to love received from the Lord, but not in the truth of faith separated from it.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.