Bible

 

Genesis 38

Studie

   

2 Aɣrəm wen da a daɣ inay Yuda tabarart n iyyan daɣ Kəl Kanan igan eṣəm Šuwa, təzzar izlaf tat, inamaṇsa dər-əs.

3 Təga tadist, təggaz aṃzur ən barar, ig'as eṣəm Er.

4 Təga tadist tolas, təggaz aṃzur ən barar təg'as eṣəm Onan.

5 Təlas igi ən tədist, ihu du barar təg'as eṣəm Šela. Barar wa as ihu Yuda iha aɣrəm ən Kəzib.

6 Izzəzlaf Yuda aɣafadday-net Er tanṭut təgat eṣəm Tamar.

7 Mišan Er, aɣafadday ən Yuda, itagg' arak mazalan wər oggem Məššina, təzzar eway du sər-əs taṃattant.

8 Təzzar iṇṇa Yuda y Onan: «Aglu, nəməṇsu əd tənṭut n amaqqar nak, ad tagaɣ əzzəbun n ələggus, tagaɣ əzzurriya y amaqqar nak.»

9 Onan iṣṣanan as əzzurriya wa wərgeɣ i nnet, id inamaṇsa əd tənṭut n amaqqar-net ad issənɣəl daɣ aṃadal fəl ma d'iga əzzurriya y amaqqar-net.

10 Arat wa wər t oggem Məššina, təzzar eway du sər-əs taṃattant ənta da.

11 Iṇṇa Yuda i təḍaggalt-net Tamar: «Əggəz afartay daɣ ahan n abba nnam har idwəl barar in Šela.» Fəlas iksud ad agu barar-net wa da taṃattant a əgan məqqaran-net. Təgla Tamar, təɣsar ɣur ši-s.

12 As təga tamert tagget aba tabarart ən Šuwa, tanṭut ən Yuda. As tu tokay tərəmmeq ən taṃattant ən taɣur-əs, igla ənta Yuda, iddew d əmidi-net Xira wa n Adulam, əkkan Timna, edag wa daɣ du tətawakkas təḍuft n ayfəḍ-net.

13 Ittəmal adi i Tamar, itawaṇṇ as əḍaggal-net iha tarrayt idag sas Timna, fəl ikus ən təḍuft n ayfəḍ-net.

14 Təzzar təkkas isəlsa-nnet win n afartay, təssəwar afər fəl at təg̣məd tazdit, təqqim dagma n əṣihar ən tarrayen n Enayim, aɣrəm ihan tarrayt ta n Timna, fəlas togga as Šela idwal, mišan harwa da wər tat itawazazlaf.

15 As tat inay Yuda iɣil tənəssexrəmt fəlas udəm-net a təssəlsa.

16 Ikk'et fəl afay ən tarrayt iṇṇ'as: «Əndam a dər-əm nəməṇsa,» fəlas wər iṣṣen as a wa təḍaggalt-net. Təṇṇ'as: «Ma di za takfa tənəməṇsa dər-i.»

17 Iṇṇ-as: «Ad am in əssəwəta aynəs daɣ aharay nin.» Təṇṇ-as: «Ardeɣ mišan dər əššərəd n a di takfa təməṭirt har i t'idu təssəwəta.»

18 Iṇṇ'as: «Ma təṃos təməṭirt ta dam z'aga?» Təṇṇ-as: «Ad i takfa əjajwəl nak əd təzarkaten-net, əd təburək a təṭṭafa da.» Ikf-as-tan. Təzzar inamaṇsa dər-əs, təga tadist.

19 Təbdad, təgla, təkkas afər wa təssəwar, təqqal isəlsa-net win afartay.

20 Issəwat Yuda aynəs əmidi-net wa n Adulam fəl ad d'awəy ɣur tənṭut kayatan win təṭṭaf əṃosnen təməṭirt. Mišan wər tat in og̣ez.

21 Iṣṣəstan dər-əs aytedan win əɣsarnen Enayim. Iṇṇ-asan: «Ma təga tənəssexrəmt as kala təwar efay ən tarrayt ta?» Əṇṇan'as: «Wər kala a tu təmal tənəssexrəmt da.»

22 Iqqal Yuda imal as as wər tat igrew, amaran aytedan da əṇṇan wər təha tənəssexrəmt akal en.

23 Iṇṇa Yuda: «Təṭṭəfet aratan win ɣur-əs, fəlas wər areɣ ad əggəzan aytedan ši nnu. Aynəs za əssəwataɣ as t'in mišan wər tətawagraw.»

24 As əganat karadat təlil dəffər adi ittəmal i Yuda as təḍaggalt-net Tamar təssəxram, təga tadist. Iṇṇa Yuda: «Tətəwəkkəset du, tətəwəsəqqədet.»

25 Amazay wa din tətawakkas təzammazal s əḍaggal-net təṇṇ'as in: «Awedan wa ilan aratan a ənta a di igan tadist, əgmaya daɣ-ak ad təṣṣəna kud təzdayaɣ ejajwəl a əd təzarkaten-net əd təburək a, təməlaɣ i du məšši-ssan.»

26 Izday tan, Yuda iṇṇa: «Tanṭut ta təla fall-i tidət fəlas nak a tat wər nəzzəzlaf i barar in Šela.» A iga adi wər kala a dər-əs ilas ənəməṇsa.

27 As tənamahaz d iguz n əṃzur itawaṣṣan as eknewan a za tilu.

28 Amazay wa ad tətaggaz aṃzur ig̣mad du əfus ən barar iyyan təqqan tənṭut ta n tənakbalt tawšet ən barar a əs tanallay zaggaɣat fəl at təssuṣən as ənta ad d'azzaran.

29 Mišan issoɣal in əfus-net, azzar as du əmidi-net təhut. Təzzar təṇṇ'as tənakbalt: «Kay tərzeɣ du tarrayt iṃan nak!» Adi da fəlas itawagg'eṣəm Fares.

30 Ihu du əmidi nnet, w'as təqqan tanallay zaggaɣat daɣ tawšet-net, itawagg'as eṣəm Zarax.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4868

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4868. And said, Grant I pray that I may come to thee. That this signifies lust for conjunction, is evident from the signification of “coming or entering to anyone” as being to be conjoined (n. 4820). That lust is meant such as is that for conjunction with a harlot, is plain; in the internal sense, with falsity. That the Jewish nation, which is here signified by “Judah” (n. 4815, 4842, 4864), regarded the internal truth of the representative church no otherwise than as falsity, and also at this day so regards it, can be seen above (n. 4865). What is now here treated of is that nevertheless this nation conjoined itself with this truth, yet not as with a wife, but as with a harlot, that is, not as with truth, but as with falsity. Lust is predicated of conjunction with falsity, just as of conjunction with a harlot.

[2] All those conjoin themselves with internal truth as with a harlot who believe only the external sense of the Word, that is, only its literal sense, and entirely reject all its internal, that is, its spiritual sense; but especially those who apply the external or literal sense of the Word to favor the cupidities of the love of self and of the world, or of rule and gain. They who do this cannot but regard internal truth in this way; and if they conjoin themselves with it, they do so from lust as for conjunction with a harlot. This is done especially by those who are of the Jewish nation, and also by those who in the Word are meant by Babylon; but not by those who indeed believe in simplicity the literal sense of the Word, and yet live according to those things which are of the internal sense, that is in love and charity, and thence in faith-for these are of the internal sense of the Word-and who also from the literal sense teach these things; for the internal and the external sense come together in the two precepts-to love the Lord above all things, and the neighbor as one’s self.

[3] That the Jewish nation regard internal truth as a harlot, and that, if they conjoin themselves with it, they do so from lust as for conjunction with a harlot, may be illustrated by the following examples. If they are told that the Word is holy, even most holy, also that every tittle therein is holy, they acknowledge it and conjoin themselves, but this from such lust; for they believe that it is holy in the letter, and not that by this means the holy flows in with those who when they read it are in the affection of good and truth.

[4] If they are told that many who are mentioned in the Word are to be venerated as holy-as Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Aaron, David-they acknowledge it and conjoin themselves, but from such a lust; for they believe that these persons were chosen in preference to others, that they are therefore holy, and that they should for this reason be worshiped as deities; when yet these men have holiness from no other source than this, that they represented the Lord; and a holy representative does not at all affect the person. Moreover, the life of everyone without distinction remains with him after death.

[5] If they are told that the ark that was with them, the temple, the altar of burnt offering, the altar of incense, the bread upon the table, the lampstand with its lamps, the perpetual fire, the sacrifices, the incenses, the oil, also the garments of Aaron, especially the breastplate on which were the Urim and Thummim, were holy, they acknowledge it and conjoin themselves, but from the same lust; for they believe that these things were holy in themselves, thus that the wood, the stone, the gold, silver, bread, and fire were holy, and this interiorly because Jehovah was in them, or that the holiness of Jehovah applied to them was actually in them. This is their internal truth, which yet is relative falsity; for the holy is solely in good and truth, which is from the Lord in love to Him and in love toward the neighbor, and thence in faith; thus only in living subjects, that is, in men who receive these things from the Lord.

[6] Again, if they are told that the Christian Church is one with the church that was instituted with them, but that it is internal, whereas theirs was external, so that when the church instituted with them is stripped of its externals and laid bare, the Christian Church comes to view, they do not acknowledge this truth otherwise than as a harlot, that is, as falsity. Nevertheless some of them, who are converted from Judaism to Christianity, conjoin themselves with this truth, but also from the same lust. Such things in the Word are often called “whoredoms.” In regard to those, however, who are signified in the Word by “Babylon,” these regard in a similar way the internal truths of the church; but because they are acquainted with internal things, and also acknowledge them in childhood, but deny them in adult age, they are described in the Word by foul adulteries and abominable copulations; for they are profanations.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.