Bible

 

Genesis 37

Studie

   

2 Ənta da əttarix ən maddanəs ən Yaqub. Yusəf iṃos abi ilan ṃaraw elan d əṣṣa, faw itakku təməḍint ən hərwan nasan iddew əd məqqaran-net maddanəs ən Bilha əd Zilfa, šiḍoden n abba nnet. Faw itaway du i ši-s isalan n arak təṇṇawen šin əgannin.

3 Israyil(eṣəm wahaḍan ən Yaqub) iṣṣof Yusəf bararan-net kul win haḍatnen fəlas tušaray-net a daq q igraw. Ig'as takatkat təknat šihussay.

4 Ənayan məqqaran-net as əntanay iṣṣof tan ši-ssan Yusəf, təzzar əgzaran tu har as abas əfragan dər-əs ələsan takkayt.

5 Iga Yusəf targət, imal asan tat, təzzar əsannahalan tu gezzar.

6 Iṇṇ'asan: «Səsəmat i ad awan əməla targət ta əgeɣ,

7 iṃan nana a nayaɣ nəha šiwəgas nətaqqan šibolasen n alkaman, as din əgreɣ təbolast ta nnu təbdad, əkkanat tat du šin nawan əɣalayɣalaynat tat, əssəjadnat as.»

8 Əṇṇan as məqqaran-net: «Əngəm kay a z iqqəlan əmənokal nana, təxkəmaɣ ana?» Əsannahalan tu məqqaran-net gezzar wəllen fəl tərgət ta sər-san iga da, d amel wa dasan tat iga.

9 Ilas Yusəf igi ən tərgət iyyat imal tat i məqqaran-net. Iṇṇa: «Əgeɣ targət iyyat tolas təṃosat as ənaya təfuk əd təllit d eṭran əṃosnen maraw d iyyan, a di sajadnen.»

10 Targət ta imal i məqqaran-net da, imal tat i ši-s ənta da. Iharaššat tu ši-s iṇṇ'as: «Ma iṃos almaɣna ən tərgət ta? Mərda nnak ad ak nəssəjəd nak, d anna nak əd məqqaran nak?»

11 Təzzar əmmənzaɣan tu məqqaran-net mišan ši-s imməɣras in ikiṭṭəw targət ta.

12 As əzəl iyyan əglan məqqaran-net əḍanan eharay ən ši-ssan daɣ aṃadal ən Šəkem.

13 Iṇṇa Israyil i Yusəf: «Iməqqaran nak wərgeɣ əkkan təməḍint əs Šəkem, ayaw a kay zəmmizəla sər-san.» Ikkəwan as Yusəf, iṇṇ'as: «Nak da.»

14 Iṇṇ'as: «Aglu əṣṣən iməqqaran nak əɣlasan, əntanay d aharay nasan, təqqəla du təməlaɣ i. Təzzar immozal Yusəf, ifal aɣlal wa n Xebron ikka Šəkem.

15 Ijiwankat as t igraw aləs iyyan, ixrak daɣ əṣuf. Iṇṇ'as: «M'as təṣaggada?»

16 Iṇṇ'as Yusəf: «Iməqqaran nin as əṣaggada, təfraga ad i təməla edag wa daɣ əssəḍanan.»

17 Iṇṇ-as aləs: «Əg̣madan edag wa fəlas əsallaɣ asan as əṇṇan:" Əndawatana aṃadal wa n Dotan!"» Iggaz Yusəf ədəriz ən məqqaran-net har tan in oṣa daɣ Dotan.

18 As t ənayan daɣ igəg, izay tan in, əgan eɣaf fəl at t anɣin.

19 Ənamaṇṇan gar-essan: «Əməggi ən tərgəten den ad d izayan den.

20 Anɣiwatanaq qu a tu nəgər daɣ iyyat daɣ təgaziwen a, ad naṇṇu əmudar at t itšan, ad nəṣṣən a wa z'əqqəlnat tərgəten-net.»

21 Isl asan Ruben, igmay d efsan-net iṇṇ'asan: «Ad wər tagim iṃan-net.»

22 Ilas iṇṇ'asan: «Ad wər tənɣəlam azni nnet, əgərat t in ɣas daɣ tagaza a təhat əṣuf da, da wər das təɣšedam arat.» Ruben ira at t assafsu har t issuɣəl i ši-s.

23 As d ewad Yusəf iməqqaran-net əzzafan tu əkkaṣan daɣ-as takatkat-net ta təknat šihussay izlag.

24 Təzzar ədkalan tu əgaran tu daɣ tagaza wər əhen aṃan.

25 Dəffər adi əqqiman ad əṭattin as d ətkalan aṣawad nasan, ənayan taɣlamt ən Kəl Ismaɣil a du təfalat aṃadal ən Gilad. Olaman nasan əggiggan ilalan əganen daɣ məglan d aḍutan əzodnen, əgan anamod ən Masar.

26 Təzzar iṇṇa Yuda i məqqaran-net: «Ma dana z'aknu ad nanɣu amaḍray nnana nəɣbər azni nnet?

27 Əndawat a t in nazzanzu i Kəl Ismaɣil, da wər das nəɣšed arat, fəlas amaḍray nnana a iṃos, nəṃos dər-əs arat iyyanda.» Təzzar əṭṭafan məqqaran-net batu ta, ənamarḍan dər-əs fall-as.

28 As d okoyan mazanzan wiyyaḍ ən Kəl Midyan, əkkasan du Yusəf daɣ tagaza, əzzənzan t in i Kəl Ismaɣil ṣanatat təmərwen ən tamma n əzrəf. Ewayan tu Kəl Ismaɣil win əs Masar.

29 Iqqal du Ruben tagaza inay as Yusəf wər tat iha. Təzzar irmaɣ ad izazarrat isəlsa nnet.

30 Iqqal iməḍrayan-net, iṇṇ'asan: «Barar wər t'illa! Əmərədda, nak ma z'aga?»

31 Təzzar əgzaman əzolaɣ ədkalan takatkat ən Yusəf, əssəlmaɣan tat daɣ əzni nnet.

32 Əsassawayan takatkat ta təknat šihussay əs ši-ssan, əṇṇan as in: «A wa da a din nog̣az əṣṣən kud takatkat ən barar nak adi wala.»

33 Izday tat iṇṇa: «Takatkat ən barar in a wa! Əmudar n əmətši at t'itšan! Yusəf barar in iqqal idesan immətša!

34 Ad izazarrat Yaqub telassay-net fəl tərəmmeq, iggaz afartay ən rur-es har ig'azzaman aggotnen.

35 Ad gammayan bararan-net əd təbararen-net ket nasan ad t'əsəssikəyan tərəmmeq mišan ugay, iṇṇa: «Kala kala, har faw əheɣ afartay iket wər əlkema i barar in s alaxirat.» Imməɣras in ihallu fall-as.

36 Siga wen Yusəf əzzənzan t'in Kəl Midyan daɣ akal wa n Masar y aləs igan eṣəm Fotifar illan ɣur Firɣawna, iṃos əmuzar ən mag̣azan-net ən nammagaran.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4750

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4750. 'And Judah said to his brothers' means the corrupt within the Church who are opposed to all good whatever. This is clear from the representation of 'Judah' in the good sense as the good of celestial love, dealt with in 3654, 3881, but in the contrary sense as an opposition to all good whatever, dealt with below; and from the meaning of 'his brothers' as those in the Church who are adherents to faith separated from charity. The reason 'Judah' here represents those who are opposed to all good whatever is that in the good sense 'Judah' in the Word represents those who are governed by the good of celestial love. Celestial love consists in love to the Lord and from this in love towards the neighbour. Those governed by this love are the ones who are the most closely joined to the Lord and therefore they live in the inmost heaven, and in a state of innocence there. This being so, they are seen by all others as small children, and entirely as visual forms of love. No one else can go near them, and therefore when they are sent to others they are surrounded by other angels, through whom the sphere of love emanating from them is moderated. If not moderated this sphere would cause those to whom they have been sent to faint, for the sphere of their love penetrates even to one's marrow.

[2] Since this love, that is, this form of the good of love, which is called celestial, is represented in the good sense by 'Judah', he therefore represents in the contrary sense the kind of thing that is the opposite of celestial good, and so is opposed to any good whatever. Most things in the Word have two meanings - a good one, and another contrary to this. The good meaning they have enables one to see the nature of their contrary one, for things in the contrary sense are the direct opposite of whatever are meant in the good sense.

[3] Each form of the good of love falls in general into one of two categories - the good of celestial love and the good of spiritual love. The opposite of the good of celestial love is in the contrary sense the evil of self-love, and the opposite of the good of spiritual love is in the contrary sense the evil of love of the world. Those governed by the evil of self-love are opposed to all good whatever, but those governed by the evil of love of the world less so. In the Word 'Judah' in the contrary sense represents those who are governed by self-love, while 'Israel' in the contrary sense represents those who are governed by love of the world, the reason being that 'Judah' represented the Lord's celestial kingdom, and 'Israel' His spiritual kingdom.

[4] The hells too are distinguished in accordance with those two loves. Spirits governed by self-love, being opposed to all good whatever, are in the deepest and consequently the most dreadful hells, whereas those governed by love of the world, being less opposed to all good whatever, are in hells not quite so deep and consequently less dreadful ones.

[5] The evil of self-love is not, as people commonly regard it, the display of superiority which is called arrogance; rather, it is hatred against the neighbour and a resulting burning desire for revenge and a delight in cruelty. These are the more internal features of self-love. Its more external features are contempt for others in comparison with oneself and an aversion to those in whom spiritual good is present. These more external features of it are sometimes accompanied by a manifest display of superiority or arrogance, sometimes they are not. For anyone who hates his neighbour in that fashion loves solely himself inwardly, and only any others whom he regards to be at unity with him, so that they are part of him and he is part of them, solely for the sake of his own selfish ends.

[6] This is what those people are like whom 'Judah' represents in the contrary sense. The Jewish nation was governed by that kind of love right from the start, for it regarded all people throughout the world as the basest slaves, of no value at all compared with themselves, and it also hated them. What is more, when self-love and love of the world did not hold them together they persecuted even their companions and brethren with similar hatred. This disposition remains with that nation even now, but because they have to seek asylum in lands not their own they conceal it.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.