Bible

 

Genesis 40

Studie

   

1 Po kurio laiko nusikalto Egipto karaliui jo vyno pilstytojas ir duonkepys.

2 Faraonas supyko ant abiejų savo valdininkų: ant vyno pilstytojų viršininko ir duonkepių viršininko.

3 Jis įsakė juos uždaryti sargybos viršininko kalėjime, kur kalėjo Juozapas.

4 Sargybos viršininkas pavedė Juozapui juos prižiūrėti ir jiems patarnauti. Jie ten sėdėjo ilgesnį laiką.

5 Egipto karaliaus vyno pilstytojas ir duonkepys tą pačią naktį sapnavo sapną, ir kiekvieno sapnas turėjo savo reikšmę.

6 Juozapas, įėjęs pas juos rytą, pastebėjo juos esant prislėgtus.

7 Jis paklausė jų: “Kodėl šiandien jūsų veidai tokie paniurę?”

8 Jie atsakė: “Sapnavome sapną, bet nėra, kas jį išaiškintų”. Juozapas jiems tarė: “Argi ne iš Dievo ateina išaiškinimas? Papasakokite juos man”.

9 Tuomet vyno pilstytojų viršininkas papasakojo savo sapną Juozapui: “Aš sapnavau, kad pasirodė vynmedis prieš mane.

10 Jis turėjo tris šakeles, išleido pumpurus, išskleidė žiedus ir subrandino vynuoges ant kekių.

11 Faraono taurę laikiau savo rankoje. Paėmiau vynuogių, išspaudžiau jas į Faraono taurę ir padaviau taurę faraonui”.

12 Juozapas jam atsakė: “Štai sapno išaiškinimas: trys šakelės yra trys dienos.

13 Po trijų dienų faraonas sugrąžins tave tarnybon, ir tu padavinėsi faraonui taurę į jo ranką, kaip pirma darydavai, kai buvai jo vyno pilstytojas.

14 Atsimink mane, kai tau bus gerai, ir pasigailėk manęs, paminėk mane faraonui ir padėk man išeiti iš šitų namų.

15 Aš esu pavogtas iš hebrajų krašto ir čia nesu nusikaltimo padaręs, už kurį mane laikytų kalėjime”.

16 Kepėjų viršininkas girdėdamas, kad jis gerai išaiškino, tarė Juozapui: “O aš sapnuodamas mačiau tris pintines ant savo galvos.

17 Viršutinėje pintinėje buvo įvairių keptų valgių faraonui, ir paukščiai lesė iš tos pintinės”.

18 Juozapas atsakė: “Štai sapno išaiškinimas: trys pintinės yra trys dienos.

19 Po trijų dienų faraonas nukirs tavo galvą, tave pakabins ant medžio, ir paukščiai les tavo kūną”.

20 Trečiąją dieną buvo faraono gimtadienis ir jis iškėlė puotą visiems savo tarnams. Jis atsiminė savo vyriausiąjį vyno pilstytoją ir vyriausiąjį duonkepį.

21 Faraonas sugrąžino vyriausiąjį vyno pilstytoją į jo tarnybą, ir jis vėl padavinėjo taurę faraonui.

22 O kepėjų viršininką jis įsakė pakarti, kaip Juozapas buvo jiems išaiškinęs.

23 Tačiau vyno pilstytojų viršininkas neatsiminė Juozapo ir pamiršo jį.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 5077

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

5077. 'The cupbearer of the king of Egypt' means among the things of the body which are subject to the understanding Part of the mind. This is clear from the meaning of 'the cupbearer' as the external or bodily senses that are subordinate or subject to the understanding part of the internal man, dealt with in what follows below; and from the meaning of 'the king of Egypt' as the natural man, dealt with below in 5079. Since the cupbearer and the baker are the subject of the narrative that follows and these mean the external senses belonging to the body, something must first be said about these. It is well known that the external or bodily senses are five in number - sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch - and also that these constitute the entire life of the body. For without those senses the body has no life at all, for which reason also when deprived of them it dies and becomes a corpse. The actual bodily part of the human being therefore is nothing else than a receiver of sensory impressions and consequently of the life resulting from these. The part played by the senses is the principal one and that by the body the instrumental. The instrumental without its principal which it is fitted to serve cannot even be called the body that a person carries around while living in the world; but the instrumental together with its principal, when they act as one, can be called such. The two together therefore constitute the body.

[2] A person's external senses are directly related to his internal ones, for they have been given to a person and placed within his body to serve his internal man while he is in the world and to exist subject to the sensory powers of that internal man. Consequently when a person's external senses begin to rule his internal ones he is done for. When this happens his internal sensory powers are regarded as no more than servants whose function is to reinforce whatever the external senses imperiously demand. When this is the state in which the external senses operate, order in their case has become turned around, a situation dealt with immediately above in 5076.

[3] A person's external senses are, as stated, directly related to his internal ones, in general to the understanding and to the will. Consequently some external senses are subject or subordinate to the understanding part of the human mind, others are subject to the will part. One sensory power specifically subject to the understanding is sight; another subject to the understanding, and after that to the will also, is hearing. Smell, and more especially taste, are subject to both simultaneously, while the power subject to the will is touch. Much evidence could be introduced to show that the external senses are subject to the understanding and the will, and also to show how they are subject; but it would take up too much space to carry the explanation so far. Something of what is involved may be recognized from what has been shown at the ends of preceding chapters about the correspondence of those senses.

[4] In addition it should be recognized that all truths that are called the truths of faith belong to the understanding part, and that all forms of good which are those of love and charity go with the will part. Consequently it is the function of the understanding to believe, acknowledge, know, and see truth - and good also. But the function of the will is to feel an affection for that truth and to love it; and whatever a person feels an affection for and loves is good. But how the understanding influences the will when truth passes into good, and how the will influences the understanding when it puts that good into effect, are matters for still deeper examination - In the Lord's Divine mercy those matters will be discussed at various points further on.

[5] The reason 'the cupbearer' means the senses subject or subordinate to the understanding Part of the internal man is that everything which serves as drink, or which is consumed as such, for example, wine, milk, or water, is related to truth, which feeds the understanding and so belongs to the understanding. Also, because the external or bodily senses play a ministering role, 'a cupbearer' therefore means those senses or what is perceived by them. For in general 'drinking' has reference to truths which feed the understanding, see 3069, 3071, 3168, 3772, 4017, 4018; the specific meaning of 'wine' is truth deriving from good, or faith from charity, 1071, 1798, while 'water' means truth, 680, 2702, 3058, 3424, 4976. From all this one may now see what 'the cupbearer' means.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.