Bible

 

Genesis 27

Studie

   

1 Izaokas paseno, ir jo akys taip aptemo, kad jis nebegalėjo matyti. Jis pasišaukė savo vyresnįjį sūnų Ezavą ir tarė jam: “Mano sūnau”. Tas atsiliepė: “Aš čia”.

2 Jis tarė: “Aš jau pasenau, nežinau savo mirties dienos.

3 Imk savo medžioklės įrankius, strėlinę ir lanką, ir, išėjęs į lauką, sumedžiok ką nors.

4 Paruošk man valgį, kokį mėgstu, atnešk jį man, kad valgyčiau ir mano siela tave palaimintų, prieš man numirštant”.

5 ebeka girdėjo Izaoką kalbant savo sūnui Ezavui. Kai Ezavas išėjo į lauką medžioti,

6 ebeka tarė savo sūnui Jokūbui: “Aš girdėjau tėvą kalbant tavo broliui Ezavui:

7 ‘Sumedžiojęs ką, paruošk man skanų valgį, kad pavalgęs galėčiau tave palaiminti Viešpaties akivaizdoje prieš savo mirtį’.

8 Taigi dabar, sūnau, klausyk mano patarimo, ką tau sakysiu.

9 Eik ir išrink iš kaimenės du geriausius ožiukus ir atnešk, kad paruoščiau iš jų tėvo mėgstamą valgį.

10 Tu jį įneši tėvui, kad jis valgytų ir tave palaimintų prieš savo mirtį”.

11 Bet Jokūbas atsakė savo motinai ebekai: “Mano brolio Ezavo kūnas apaugęs plaukais, o aš žmogus neplaukuotas.

12 Jei mano tėvas mane palytės, tada pasirodysiu kaip apgavikas. Taip užsitrauksiu prakeikimą­ne palaiminimą”.

13 Tačiau motina jam atsakė: “Sūnau, tas prakeikimas tekrinta ant manęs! Tik klausyk manęs ir nuėjęs atnešk, ką sakiau!”

14 Taigi jis nuėjęs atnešė motinai ožiukus, o ji pagamino skanų valgį, kurį mėgo tėvas.

15 Tada ebeka, paėmusi savo vyriausiojo sūnaus Ezavo geriausius drabužius, kurie buvo namie, apvilko jais jaunesnįjį sūnų Jokūbą,

16 o ožiukų kailiais apvyniojo jo neplaukuotas rankas ir kaklą.

17 Tada ji padavė paruoštą valgį ir duonos savo sūnui Jokūbui.

18 Jokūbas, įėjęs pas savo tėvą, tarė: “Mano tėve!” O tas atsiliepė: “Aš čia. Kas tu esi, mano sūnau?”

19 Jokūbas atsakė: “Aš esu Ezavas, tavo pirmagimis. Padariau, kaip man liepei. Kelkis, sėsk ir valgyk, ką sumedžiojau, kad tavo siela palaimintų mane”.

20 Izaokas paklausė: “Kaipgi, mano sūnau, taip greitai suradai?” Tas atsakė: “Viešpats, tavo Dievas, suteikė man laimės”.

21 Izaokas tarė Jokūbui: “Prieik, kad galėčiau paliesti tave, mano sūnau, ir įsitikinčiau, ar tu tikrai esi mano sūnus Ezavas”.

22 Jokūbas priėjo prie savo tėvo. Tas, jį palietęs, tarė: “Balsas Jokūbo, bet rankos Ezavo”.

23 Jis neatpažino jo, nes rankos buvo plaukuotos kaip jo brolio Ezavo; taip Izaokas palaimino Jokūbą.

24 Tėvas paklausė: “Ar tu tikrai esi mano sūnus Ezavas?” Tas atsiliepė: “Taip, esu”.

25 Izaokas tarė: “Atnešk, ką sumedžiojai, kad mano siela galėtų tave palaiminti”. Jokūbas atnešė jam, ir šis valgė, ir jis atnešė jam vyno, ir šis gėrė.

26 Tada jo tėvas Izaokas jam tarė: “Prieik ir pabučiuok mane, sūnau!”

27 Šis priėjęs pabučiavo jį, o tėvas, užuodęs Ezavo drabužių kvapą, laimindamas jį tarė: “Mano sūnaus kvapas, kaip kvapas laukų, kuriuos palaimino Viešpats.

28 Tau Dievas teduoda dangaus rasos, derlingos žemės ir apsčiai javų bei vyno!

29 Tetarnauja tau tautos ir tenusilenkia prieš tave giminės! Viešpatauk savo broliams, ir tesilenkia prieš tave tavo motinos sūnūs! Kas tave keiktų, tebūna prakeiktas, o kas tave laimintų, tebūna palaimintas!”

30 Izaokui baigus laiminti Jokūbą ir jam tik išėjus iš savo tėvo Izaoko, jo brolis Ezavas grįžo iš medžioklės.

31 Jis irgi paruošė skanų valgį ir, atnešęs tėvui, tarė: “Kelkis, tėve, ir valgyk savo sūnaus medžioklės laimikio, kad tavo siela mane palaimintų!”

32 Bet Izaokas klausė: “Kas tu esi?” Šis atsakė: “Aš esu tavo sūnus, tavo pirmagimis Ezavas”.

33 Tada Izaokas išsigando ir drebėdamas tarė: “Kas gi buvo tas, kuris anksčiau sumedžiojo ir man atnešė valgį? Aš, prieš tau pareinant, valgiau ir jį palaiminau. Jis ir bus palaimintas!”

34 Ezavas, išgirdęs savo tėvo žodžius, pradėjo labai garsiai ir graudžiai verkti, sakydamas tėvui: “Mano tėve, palaimink ir mane!”

35 Bet tėvas atsakė: “Tavo brolis klasta gavo tavo palaiminimą”.

36 Ezavas tarė: “Teisingai jį pavadino Jokūbu. Juk jis jau du kartus apgavo mane: paėmė mano pirmagimio teisę ir štai dabar­tavo palaiminimą. Nejaugi tu man nepalikai palaiminimo?”

37 Izaokas atsakė Ezavui: “Aš jį padariau tavo valdovu ir visus jo brolius atidaviau jam tarnais, javais ir vynu jį aprūpinau. Ką gi galiu padaryti dėl tavęs, mano sūnau?”

38 Ezavas tarė tėvui: “Tėve, ar tik vieną turi palaiminimą? Palaimink ir mane!” Ir Ezavas balsu verkė.

39 Jo tėvas Izaokas atsakė: “Tu neturėsi derlingos žemės savo gyvenvietėje ir dangaus rasos.

40 Savo kardu tu maitinsies ir savo broliui tarnausi. Bet ateis laikas, kada pasipriešinsi ir nusimesi jo jungą”.

41 Ezavas nekentė Jokūbo dėl tėvo palaiminimo. Ir Ezavas sakė savo širdyje: “Artėja gedulo dienos dėl tėvo, tada užmušiu savo brolį Jokūbą!”

42 ebekai buvo perduoti jos vyresniojo sūnaus žodžiai. Ji tada pasišaukė savo jaunesnįjį sūnų Jokūbą ir tarė: “Tavo brolis Ezavas rengiasi atkeršyti tau ir nori užmušti tave.

43 Taigi dabar, mano sūnau, klausyk manęs! Bėk pas mano brolį Labaną į Charaną

44 ir gyvenk pas jį, kol paliaus tavo brolio rūstybė,

45 kol tavo brolio pyktis atsileis ir jis pamirš, ką jam padarei! Po to aš nusiųsiu ką nors, kad tave pargabentų. Kodėl turėčiau jūsų abiejų netekti vieną dieną?”

46 ebeka tarė Izaokui: “Man įgriso mano gyvenimas dėl hetitų dukterų. Jei dar ir Jokūbas ves hetitę, tai kam man begyventi?”

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 3519

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

3519. 'And take for me from there two good kids of the she-goats' means truths born from that good. This is clear from the meaning of 'kids of the she-goats' as truths born from good, dealt with below. The reason for having 'two' was that as in the rational so in the natural there are things of the will and those of the understanding. Things in the natural that belong to the will are delights, while those that belong to the understanding are facts. These two have to be joined together if they are to be anything at all.

[2] As regards 'kids of the she-goats' meaning truths born from good, this becomes clear from those places in the Word where kids and she-goats are mentioned. It should be recognized that all gentle and useful beasts mentioned in the Word mean in the genuine sense celestial things, which are forms of good, and spiritual things, which are forms of truth, see 45, 46, 142, 143, 246, 714, 715, 776, 2179, 2180, 2781, 3218. And since there are various genera of celestial things or forms of good, and consequently there are various genera of spiritual things or forms of truth, one beast has a different meaning from another; that is to say, a lamb has one meaning, a kid another, and a sheep, she-goat, ram, he-goat, young bull, or ox another, while a horse or a camel has yet another meaning. Birds have a different meaning again, as also do beasts of the sea, such as sea monsters, and fish. The genera of celestial and spiritual things, and consequently of forms of good and truth, are more than anyone can number, even though when that which is celestial or good is mentioned, and also when that which is spiritual or truth, this is not envisaged as being anything complex, consisting of many parts, but as a single entity. Yet how complex both of these are, that is, how countless the genera are of which they consist, may be seen from what has been stated about heaven in 3241, to the effect that it is distinguished into countless separate communities, according to the genera of celestial and spiritual things, that is, of goods of love and of derivative truths of faith. Furthermore each genus of good and each genus of truth has countless species into which the communities of each genus are separated. And each species in a similar way has separate sub-species.

[3] The commonest genera of good and truth are what the living creatures offered as burnt offerings and sacrifices represented. And because the genera are quite distinct and separate, people were explicitly commanded to use those living creatures and no others, that is to say, in some sacrifices lambs and ewe-lambs, and also kids and female kids of she-goats were to be used, in other sacrifices rams and sheep, and also he-goats, were to be used, while in other sacrifices again, calves, young bulls, and oxen, or else pigeons and doves, were to be used, see 992, 1823, 2180, 2805, 2807, 2830, 3218. What kids and she-goats meant however becomes clear both from the sacrifices in which they used to be offered and from other places in the Word. These show that lambs and ewe-lambs meant innocence belonging to the internal or rational man, and kids and she-goats innocence belonging to the external or natural man, and so the truth and the good of the latter.

[4] The fact that truth and good present in the innocence that belongs to the external or natural man is meant by a kid and a she-goat is clear from the following places in the Word: In Isaiah,

The wolf will dwell with the lamb, and the leopard will lie down with the kid, the calf also and the young lion and the sheep together; and a little child will lead them. Isaiah 11:6.

This refers to the Lord's kingdom and to the state there in which people have no fear of evil, that is, no dread of hell, because they are with the Lord. 'The lamb' and 'the kid' stand for people who have innocence within them, and who, being the most secure of all, are mentioned first.

[5] When all the firstborn of Egypt were smitten the people were commanded to kill from among the lambs or among the kids a male without blemish, and to put some of the blood on the doorposts and on the lintel of their houses; and so the destroyer would not strike them with the plague, Exodus 12:5, 7, 13. 'The firstborn of Egypt' means the good of love and charity that was wiped out, 3325. 'The lambs' and 'the kids' are states of innocence, in which those with whom these exist are secure from evil. Indeed all in heaven are kept secure by the Lord through states of innocence. That security was represented by the killing of the lamb or kid, and putting the blood on the doorposts and on the lintel of the houses. .

[6] To avert his own death when a person saw Jehovah manifested as an angel he would sacrifice 'a kid of the she-goats', as Gideon did when he saw Him, Judges 6:19, and also Manoah, Judges 13:15-16, 19. The reason they offered a kid was that Jehovah or the Lord cannot appear to anybody, not even to an angel, unless the one to whom He appears is in a state of innocence. Therefore as soon as the Lord is present people are brought into a state of innocence, for the Lord enters in by way of innocence, even with angels in heaven. Consequently no one is able to enter heaven unless he has a measure of innocence, according to the Lord's words recorded in Matthew 18:3; Mark 10:15; Luke 18:17. Regarding people's belief that they would die when Jehovah appeared to them if they did not offer such a burnt offering, see Judges 13:22-23.

[7] Since genuine conjugial love is innocence itself, 2736, it was customary in the representative Church for a man to go to his wife with the gift of a kid of the she-goats, as one reads of Samson in Judges 15:1, and also of Judah when he visited Tamar, Genesis 38:17, 20, 23. The fact that 'a kid' and 'a she-goat' meant innocence is also evident from the sacrifices made as guilt offerings that a person would offer if he had sinned through error, Leviticus 1:10; 4:28; 5:6. Sinning through error is sinning through ignorance that has innocence within it. The same is evident from the following Divine command in Moses,

You shall bring the first of the firstfruits of your land to the house of Jehovah your God. You shall not boil a kid in its mother's milk. Exodus 23:19; 34:26.

Here the requirement 'to bring the firstfruits of the land to the house of Jehovah' means the state of innocence which exists in early childhood; and 'not boiling a kid in its mother's milk' means that they were not to destroy the innocence of early childhood. This being their meaning, the one command, in both places referred to, follows directly after the other. In the literal sense there seems to be no connection at all between them as there is in the internal sense.

[8] Because kids and she-goats, as has been stated, meant innocence it was also required that the curtains over the tabernacle should be made from she-goat hair, Exodus 25:4; 26:7; 35:5-6, 23, 26; 36:14, as a sign that all the holy things represented in it depended for their very being on innocence. 'She-goat hair' means the last or outermost degree of innocence present in ignorance, such as exists with gentiles who in the internal sense are meant by the curtains of the tabernacle. These considerations now show what truths born of good are, and what the nature of these is, meant by the two good kids of the she-goats which Rebekah his mother spoke about to Jacob. That is to say, they are truths belonging to innocence or early childhood, meant also by the things which Esau was to bring to Isaac his father, dealt with in 3501, 3508. They were not in fact such truths, but initially they appeared to be. Thus it was that Jacob pretended by means of them to be Esau.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.