Bible

 

Genesis 16

Studie

   

1 Abromo žmona Saraja ne turėjo vaikų. Ji turėjo tarnaitę egiptietę, vardu Hagara.

2 Saraja tarė Abromui: “Viešpats nedavė man vaikų gimdyti. Prašau, įeik pas mano tarnaitę, galbūt per ją aš turėsiu vaikų”. Abromas paklausė Sarajos.

3 Abromui išgyvenus dešimt metų Kanaano šalyje, Saraja, Abromo žmona, savo tarnaitę egiptietę Hagarą davė savo vyrui Abromui už žmoną.

4 Jis įėjo pas Hagarą, ir ji pastojo. Hagara pastojusi su panieka ėmė žiūrėti į savo valdovę.

5 Tada Saraja tarė Abromui: “Širdgėla, kurią turiu, tegula ant tavęs! Aš pati daviau savo tarnaitę tau į glėbį, tačiau ji, pasijutusi nėščia, su panieka ėmė žiūrėti į mane. Viešpats tebūna teisėjas tarp manęs ir tavęs”.

6 Abromas tarė Sarajai: “Tavo tarnaitė yra tavo rankose. Elkis su ja, kaip tau patinka”. Kai Saraja ėmė ją spausti, ta pabėgo.

7 Viešpaties angelas, radęs ją prie vandens šaltinio dykumoje, prie kelio į Šūrą,

8 tarė: “Hagara, Sarajos tarnaite, iš kur atėjai ir kur eini?” Ji atsakė: “Bėgu nuo savo valdovės Sarajos”.

9 Viešpaties angelas jai tarė: “Sugrįžk pas savo valdovę ir nusižemink prieš ją.

10 Aš taip padauginsiu tavo palikuonis, kad jų net suskaičiuoti nebus galima.

11 Štai tu esi nėščia ir pagimdysi sūnų. Tu jį pavadinsi Izmaeliu, nes Viešpats išgirdo apie tavo priespaudą.

12 Tavo sūnus gyvens kaip laukinis asilas: jis bus prieš visus ir visi prieš jį, jis gyvens šalia savo brolių”.

13 Ir Viešpatį, kuris su ja kalbėjo, Hagara pavadino: “Tu esi Dievas, kuris mane matai”. Nes ji sakė: “Aš tikrai mačiau Dievą, kuris mato mane”.

14 Todėl tą šulinį pavadino Lahai oiju. Jis yra tarp Kadešo ir Beredo.

15 Hagara pagimdė Abromui sūnų. Abromas pavadino jį vardu Izmaelis.

16 Abromui buvo aštuoniasdešimt šešeri metai, kai Hagara pagimdė jam sūnų.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 1914

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

1914. My wrong be upon thee; I gave my handmaid into thy bosom. That this signifies unwillingness to take blame upon itself, is evident without explication. In the internal sense there is involved in these words that the Lord perceived this first rational to be such as to lightly esteem intellectual truth, on which account He rebuked it. For the Lord thought from intellectual truth, as before said (n. 1904); and because this truth is above the rational, it could perceive and see the quality of this rational, namely, that it held that truth in low esteem.

[2] That the Lord could perceive and see from the interior man what was the quality of the new rational in Himself, may be seen from the fact that the interior can perceive what takes place in the exterior, or what is the same, that the higher can see what is in the lower; but not the reverse. Moreover they who have conscience can do this and are accustomed to do it, for when anything contrary to the truth of conscience flows into the thought, or into the endeavor of the will, they not only perceive it, but also find fault with it; and it even grieves them to be of such a character. Still more can those do this who have perception, as perception is more interior in the rational. What then could not the Lord do, who had Divine celestial perception, and thought from the affection of intellectual truth, which is above the rational! Therefore He could not but be indignant, knowing that nothing of evil and falsity was from Himself, and that from the affection of truth He took the greatest pains that His rational should be pure. This shows that the Lord did not lightly esteem intellectual truth, but that He perceived the first rational in Himself to be thinking lightly of it.

[3] What it is to think from intellectual truth cannot be explained to the apprehension, and the less so because no one but the Lord ever thought from this affection and from this truth. He who thinks therefrom is above the angelic heaven, for even the angels of the third heaven do not think from intellectual truth, but from the interior of the rational. But so far as the Lord united His Human Essence to His Divine Essence, He thought from the Divine good itself, that is, from Jehovah.

[4] The fathers of the Most Ancient Church who had perception, thought from the interior rational. The fathers of the Ancient Church, who had not perception but conscience, thought from the exterior or natural rational. But all who are without conscience do not think at all from the rational, since they have not the rational, although they appear to have it; but they think from the sensuous and corporeal natural. The reason why they who have no conscience cannot think from the rational, is that they have no rational, as just said. The rational man is he who thinks the good and truth of faith, and by no means he who thinks contrary thereto. They who think evil and falsity are insane in their thought, and therefore the rational can by no means be predicated of them.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.