Bible

 

創世記 40

Studie

   

1 これらの事のエジプト王の給仕役と料理役とがそのエジプト王に罪を犯した。

2 パロはふたりの役人、すなわち給仕役の長と料理役の長に向かって憤り、

3 侍衛長のの監禁所、すなわちヨセフがつながれている獄屋に入れた。

4 侍衛長はヨセフに命じて彼らと共におらせたので、ヨセフは彼らに仕えた。こうして彼らは監禁所で幾かを過ごした。

5 さて獄屋につながれたエジプト王の給仕役と料理役のふたりは一のうちにそれぞれ意味のある夢を見た

6 ヨセフが、彼らのところへ行って見ると、彼らは悲しみに沈んでいた。

7 そこでヨセフは自分と一緒に主人の監禁所にいるパロの役人たちに尋ねて言った、「どうして、きょう、あなたがたの色が悪いのですか」。

8 彼らは言った、「わたしたちはを見ましたが、解いてくれる者がいません」。ヨセフは彼らに言った、「解くことはによるのではありませんか。どうぞ、わたしに話してください」。

9 給仕役の長はそのをヨセフに話して言った、「わたしが見たで、わたしのに一本のぶどうの木がありました。

10 そのぶどうの木につの枝があって、芽を出し、花が咲き、ぶどうのふさが熟しました。

11 時にわたしのに、パロの杯があって、わたしはそのぶどうを取り、それをパロの杯にしぼり、その杯をパロのにささげました」。

12 ヨセフは言った、「その解き明かしはこうです。つの枝はです。

13 今からのうちにパロはあなたのを上げて、あなたを元の役目に返すでしょう。あなたはさきに給仕役だった時にされたように、パロのに杯をささげられるでしょう。

14 それで、あなたがしあわせになられたら、わたしを覚えていて、どうかわたしに恵みを施し、わたしの事をパロに話して、このからわたしを出してください。

15 わたしは、実はヘブルびとの地からさらわれてきた者です。またここでもわたしは地下の獄屋に入れられるような事はしなかったのです」。

16 料理役の長はその解き明かしの良かったのを見て、ヨセフに言った、「わたしも夢を見たが、白いパンのかごがつ、わたしのの上にあった。

17 一番上のかごには料理役がパロのために作ったさまざまの食物があったが、がわたしのの上のかごからそれを食べていた」。

18 ヨセフは答えて言った、「その解き明かしはこうです。つのかごはです。

19 今からのうちにパロはあなたのを上げ離して、あなたをに掛けるでしょう。そしてがあなたのを食い取るでしょう」。

20 さて目はパロの誕生であったので、パロはすべての家来のためにふるまいを設け、家来のうちの給仕役の長のと、料理役の長のを上げた。

21 すなわちパロは給仕役の長を給仕役の職に返したので、彼はパロの手に杯をささげた。

22 しかしパロは料理役の長を木に掛けた。ヨセフが彼らに解き明かしたとおりである。

23 ところが、給仕役の長はヨセフを思い出さず、忘れてしまった。

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 5114

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

5114. 'And on the vine three shoots' means derivatives from this even to the final one. This is clear from the meaning of 'the vine' as the understanding part, dealt with immediately above in 5113; from the meaning of 'three' as complete and continuous even to the end, dealt with in 2788, 4495; and from the meaning of 'shoots' as derivatives; for since 'the vine' means the understanding part, 'shoots' means nothing else than derivatives from this. Because 'three' means that which is continuous even to the end, that is, which goes from first to last, 'three shoots' means derivative degrees extending from the understanding part to the final level, which is that of the senses. The first in the sequence is the actual understanding part, and the last is the senses. In general the understanding part is the sight which the internal man possesses and which sees by the light of heaven radiating from the Lord; and everything it sees is spiritual or celestial. But the senses, in general, belong to the external man; and here the sensory power of sight is meant because this corresponds to and is subordinate to the understanding part. The sensory power of sight sees by the light of the world radiating from the sun; and everything it sees is worldly, bodily, or earthly.

[2] In the human being there exist derivatives from the understanding part that dwells in the light of heaven; and they extend to the senses which dwell in the light of the world. Unless these derivatives existed the senses could not possess any life of a human quality. A person does not owe the life which his senses possess to what he sees by the light of the world, for the light of the world holds no life within it; he owes it to what he sees by the light of heaven, for this light does hold life within it. When the light of heaven falls on the perceptions a person has gained by the light of the world, it brings life to them and enables him to see objects in an intelligent manner, and thus as a human being. In this way a person possessing factual knowledge born from things which he has seen and heard in the world, and therefore from those which have entered in through the senses, comes to possess intelligence and wisdom, on which in turn he bases his public, private, and spiritual life.

[3] As regards derivatives specifically, the nature of their existence in a person is such that no brief explanation of them is possible. They exist as degrees, like steps, from the understanding part down to the senses. But no one can have any conception of those degrees unless he knows how they are related to one another, that is to say, that they are quite distinct and separate from one another, so distinct that interior degrees can come into being and remain in being without exterior ones, but not exterior degrees without interior ones. For example, a person's spirit can remain in being without a material body, as it also actually does when death separates it from the body. For a person's spirit exists in an interior degree, his body in an exterior one. Similarly with a person's spirit after death. If he is one of the blessed his spirit exists in a final and outermost degree when in the first heaven; in a more interior degree when in the second; and in the inmost one when in the third. When it exists in the inmost it exists at the same time in the other degrees, though these are inactive with him, almost as the human body is inactive during sleep, but with this difference that interiorly angels are at such times fully awake. Therefore as many distinct and separate degrees exist in the human being as there are heavens, apart from the final one, which is the body and the bodily senses.

[4] From all this regarding a person's spirit one may gain some idea of the way derivatives are related to one another from the first to the final one, that is, from the understanding part to the senses. A person's life, which he receives from the Lord's Divine, passes through these degrees from the inmost to the final one. At every degree there exists a derivative of that life which becomes increasingly general, until in the final degree it is the most general. Derivatives in the lower degrees are merely combinations - or to put it more appropriately, structured forms - of the individual and particular constituents of the higher degrees ranged consecutively, with the addition of the kinds of things drawn from purer nature, and after that from grosser nature, that can serve as containing vessels. Once these vessels are done away with, the individual and particular constituents of the higher degrees, which had received form in those vessels, move back to the degree immediately above. And because in the case of the human being there is a link with the Divine, and his inmost being is such that it can accept the Divine - and not only accept but also make Him its own, by acknowledging and having an affection for the Divine, thus by a reciprocal response to Him - and because he thereby has the Divine implanted within him, he can never die. Indeed what is eternal and infinite exists with him, not only through their flowing into him but also through his reception of them.

[5] From this one may see how uninformed and senseless in their thinking regarding the human being those people are who compare him to animals and imagine that he will not be alive after death any more than they are. Such people do not take into consideration the fact that with animals there is no acceptance of the Divine or any acknowledgement or affection leading to a reciprocal response to the Divine by making Him their own, or any consequent joining to Him. Nor do those people take into consideration the fact that, as the animal state is like this, the recipient forms of life which these possess are inevitably dissipated; for with animals that which flows into them passes through their organic forms into the world, where it comes to an end and melts away, never to make any return there.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.