Bible

 

創世記 27

Studie

   

1 以撒年老,眼睛昏花,不能見,就了他大兒子以掃來,:我兒。以掃:我在這裡。

2 :我如今老了,不知道一天死。

3 現在拿你的器械,就是箭囊和,往田野去為我打獵,

4 照我所的做成美味,拿給我,使我在未之先給你祝福

5 以撒對他兒子以掃說話,利百加也見了。以掃往田野去打獵,要得野味帶來

6 利百加就對他兒子雅各:我見你父親對你哥哥以掃

7 你去把野獸帶來,做成美味給我,我好在未死之先,在耶和華面前給你祝福

8 現在,我兒,你要照著我所吩咐你的,從我的話。

9 你到羊群裡去,給我拿兩隻肥山羊羔來,我便照你父親的給他做成美味。

10 你拿到你父親那裡給他,使他在未之先給你祝福

11 雅各對他母親利百加:我哥哥以掃渾身是有毛的,我身上是光滑的;

12 倘若我父親摸著我,必以我為欺哄人的,我就招咒詛,不得祝福。

13 母親對他:我兒,你招的咒詛歸到我身上;你只管我的話,去把羊羔給我拿來。

14 他便去拿來,交給他母親;他母親就照他父親的做成美味。

15 利百加又把家裡所存大兒子以掃上好的衣服給他小兒子雅各穿上,

16 又用山羊包在雅各的上和頸項的光滑處,

17 就把所做的美味和餅交在他兒子雅各裡。

18 雅各到他父親那裡:我父親!他:我在這裡。我兒,你是誰?

19 雅各對他父親:我是你的長子以掃;我已照你所吩咐我的行了。請起來坐著我的野味,好給我祝福

20 以撒對他兒子:我兒,你如何得這麼呢?他:因為耶和華─你的使我遇見好機會得著的。

21 以撒雅各:我兒,你前來,我摸摸你,知道你真是我的兒子以掃不是?

22 雅各就挨父親以撒以撒摸著他,:聲音是雅各的聲音,卻是以掃

23 以撒就辨不出他來;因為他上有毛,像他哥哥以掃一樣,就給他祝福

24 :你真是我兒子以掃麼?他:我是。

25 以撒:你遞給我,我好兒子的野味,給你祝福。雅各就遞給他,他便吃了,又拿酒給他,他也了。

26 父親以撒對他:我兒,你上前來與我親嘴。

27 他就上前與父親親嘴。他父親一衣服上的香氣,就給他祝福:我兒的香氣如同耶和華賜福之田地的香氣一樣。

28 賜你上的甘上的肥土,並許多五穀新酒

29 願多民事奉你,多國跪拜你。願你作你弟兄的主;你母親的兒子向你跪拜。凡咒詛你的,願他受咒詛;為你祝福的,願他蒙福。

30 以撒雅各祝福已畢,雅各從他父親那裡才出,他哥哥以掃正打獵回

31 也做了美味,拿來給他父親:請父親起來,兒子的野味,好給我祝福

32 父親以撒對他:你是誰?他:我是你的長子以掃

33 以撒地戰兢,:你未之先,是誰得了野味拿給我呢?我已經吃了,為他祝福;他將也必蒙福。

34 以掃了他父親,就放聲痛哭,:我父阿,求你也為我祝福

35 以撒:你兄弟已經用詭計將你的福分奪去了。

36 以掃:他名雅各,豈不是正對麼?因為他欺騙了我兩次:他從前奪了我長子的名分,你看,他現在又奪了我的福分。以掃又:你沒有留下為我可祝的福麼?

37 以撒回答以掃:我已立他為你的主,使他的弟兄都他作僕人,並賜他五穀新酒可以養生。我兒,現在我還能為你做甚麼呢?

38 以掃對他父親:父阿,你只有樣可祝的福麼?我父阿,求你也為我祝福以掃就放聲而哭。

39 父親以撒上的肥土必為你所上的甘必為你所得。

40 你必倚靠刀度日,又必事奉你的兄弟;到你強盛的時候,必從你頸項上掙開他的軛。

41 以掃因他父親雅各祝的福,就怨恨雅各:為我父親居喪的日子近了,到那時候,我要殺我的兄弟雅各

42 有人把利百加大兒子以掃告訴利百加,他就打發人去,了他小兒子雅各來,對他:你哥哥以掃想要殺你,報仇雪恨。

43 現在,我兒,你要我的話:起來,逃往哈蘭、我哥哥拉班那裡去,

44 同他些日子,直等你哥哥的怒氣消了。

45 哥哥向你消了怒氣,忘了你向他所做的事,我便打發人去把你從那裡帶回來。為甚麼日喪你們人呢?

46 利百加對以撒:我因這赫人的女子連性命都厭煩了;倘若雅各也娶赫人的女子為妻,像這些一樣,我活著還有甚麼益處呢?

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 3518

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

3518. Go now to the flock. That this signifies to natural domestic good not conjoined with the Divine rational, is evident from the signification of “flock,” as being good (n. 343, 415, 1565), here, natural good, because it is said to Jacob, and indeed domestic good, because it was at home, whereas the field whence Esau (by whom is signified the good of the natural, n. 3500, 3508) took his hunting, was good not domestic. Elsewhere in the Word “flock” is predicated of the good of the rational; but in this case “herd” is predicated of the good of the natural (n. 2566). Natural domestic good is that good which a man derives from his parents, or into which he is born, quite distinct from the good of the natural which flows in from the Lord (the nature and quality of natural good may be seen above, n. 3470, 3471); and therefore for the sake of distinction the one good is called the Good of the Natural, and the other Natural Good. Moreover every man receives domestic good from his father and from his mother, which goods are in themselves distinct; that which he receives from the father being interior, and that from the mother exterior. In the Lord these goods were most distinct, for the good which He had from the Father was Divine, but that which He had from the mother was contaminated with hereditary evil; that good in the natural which the Lord had from the Father was His own, because it was His very life, and is that which is represented by Esau; whereas the natural good which the Lord derived from the mother, being contaminated with hereditary evil, was in itself evil, and this is what is meant by “domestic good.” Although of such a character, this good was yet of service for the reformation of the natural; but when it had answered this purpose it was rejected.

[2] The case is similar with every man who is being regenerated: the good which he receives from the Lord as from a new father is interior, but the good which he derives from his parents is exterior; the former good, which he receives from the Lord, is called spiritual; but the latter, which he derives from his parents, is called natural good. The good that a man derives from his parents is serviceable first of all for his reformation, for by means of it are introduced as by what is pleasurable and delightful, first, memory-knowledges, and afterwards the knowledges of truth; but when it has served as a means for this use it is separated from these; and then spiritual good comes forth and manifests itself. This must be evident from much experience, as from the single instance that when a child is first instructed he is affected with the desire of knowing, not at first for any end that is manifest to himself, but from a certain pleasure and delight that is born with him and is also derived from other sources; but afterwards, as he grows up, he is affected with the desire of knowing for the sake of some end, as that he may excel others, or his rivals; and next for some end in the world; but when he is to be regenerated, he is affected from the delight and pleasantness of truth; and when he is being regenerated, which takes place in adult age, from the love of truth, and afterwards from the love of good; and then the ends which had preceded, together with their delights, are separated little by little, and to them succeeds interior good from the Lord, which manifests itself in his affection. From this it is evident that the former delights, which had appeared in the outward form as good, had served as means. Such successions of means are continual.

[3] The case herein may be compared to that of a tree, which in its first age, or at the beginning of spring, adorns its branches with leaves, and afterwards as its age or the spring advances, decorates them with flowers; and next in summer puts forth the first germs of fruits, which afterwards become fruit; and lastly puts seeds therein, which contain in them new trees of a like kind, and indeed whole orchards in potency; and if the seeds are sown, in act. Such analogues are there in nature, which also are representative; for universal nature is a theater representative of the Lord’s kingdom in the heavens, thus of His kingdom on earth, that is, in the church, and hence of His kingdom in every regenerate man. From this it is plain how natural or domestic good, although a merely outward delight and indeed a worldly one, may serve as a means for producing the good of the natural, which may conjoin itself with the good of the rational, and thus become regenerate or spiritual good, that is, good which is from the Lord. These are the things which are represented and signified by “Esau and Jacob” in this chapter.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.