Bible

 

创世记 46

Studie

   

1 以色列带着一切所有的,起身到别是巴,就献祭给他父亲以撒的

2 夜间,在异象中对以色列雅各雅各!他:我在这里。

3 :我是,就是你父亲。你埃及去不要害怕,因为我必使你在那里成为族。

4 我要和你同埃及去,也必定带你上来;约瑟必给你送终(原文作将按在你的眼睛上)。

5 雅各就从别是巴起行。以色列的儿子们使他们的父亲雅各和他们的妻子、儿女都坐在法老雅各送来的车上。

6 他们又带着迦南所得的牲畜、货财埃及雅各和他的一切子孙都一同来了

7 雅各把他的儿子、孙子、女儿、孙女,并他的子子孙孙,一同带到埃及

8 埃及以色列人名字记在下面。雅各和他的儿孙:雅各长子是流便。

9 流便的儿子是哈诺、法路、希斯伦、迦米。

10 西缅儿子是耶母利、雅悯、阿辖、雅斤、琐辖,还有迦南女子所生的扫罗

11 利未的儿子是革顺、哥辖、米拉利。

12 犹大的儿子是珥、俄南、示拉、法勒斯、谢拉;惟有珥与俄南迦南。法勒斯的儿子是希斯伦、哈母勒。

13 以萨迦的儿子是陀拉、普瓦、约伯、伸仑。

14 西布伦的儿子是西烈、以伦、雅利。

15 这是利亚在巴旦亚兰给雅各所生的儿子,还在女儿底拿。儿孙共三十三人。

16 迦得的儿子是洗非芸、哈基、书尼、以斯本、以利、亚罗底、亚列利。

17 亚设的儿子是音拿、亦施瓦、亦施韦、比利亚,还有他们的妹子西拉。比利亚的儿子是希别、玛结。

18 这是拉班给他女儿利亚的婢女悉帕从雅各所生的儿孙,共有十六人。

19 雅各之妻拉结的儿子是约瑟和便雅悯。

20 约瑟在埃及生了玛拿西以法莲,就是安城的祭司波提非拉的女儿亚西纳给约瑟生的。

21 便雅悯的儿子是比拉、比结、亚实别、基拉、乃幔、以希、罗实、母平、户平、亚勒。

22 这是拉结给雅各所生的儿孙,共有十四人。

23 但的儿子是户伸。

24 拿弗他利的儿子是雅薛、沽尼、耶色、示冷。

25 这是拉班给他女儿拉结的婢女辟拉从雅各所生的儿孙,共有人。

26 那与雅各同到埃及的,除了他儿妇之外,凡从他所生的,共有六十六人。

27 还有约瑟在埃及所生的两个儿子。雅各埃及的共有七十人。

28 雅各打发犹大先去见约瑟,请派人引歌珊去;於是他们歌珊

29 约瑟套车往歌珊去,迎接他父亲以色列,及至见了面,就伏在父亲的颈项,哭了许久。

30 以色列对约瑟:我既得见你的面,知道你还在,就是我也甘心。

31 约瑟对他的弟兄和他父的全家:我要上去告诉法老,对他:我的弟兄和我父的全家从前在迦南,现今都到我这里来了

32 他们本是牧的人,以养牲畜为业;他们把羊群牛群和一切所有的都带来了。

33 法老召你们的时候,问你们:你们以何事为业?

34 你们要:你的仆人,从幼年直到如今,都以养牲畜为业,连我们的祖宗也都以此为业。这样,你们可以歌珊,因为凡牧的都被埃及人所厌恶。

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4818

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4818. And Judah saw there a daughter of a man, a Canaanite. That this signifies the affection of evil from the falsity of evil, is evident from the signification of a “daughter,” as being the affection of good (n. 2362), and in the opposite sense the affection of evil (n. 3024); and from the signification of a “man,” as being one who is intelligent, and in the abstract sense truth, but in the opposite sense one who is not intelligent, and falsity, as just above (n. 4816); and from the signification of a “Canaanite,” as being evil (n. 1573, 1574). From this it is evident that by a “daughter of a man a Canaanite” is signified evil which is from the falsity of evil. What evil from the falsity of evil is, will be shown below.

[2] Here something must first be said about the origins of the tribe of Judah, for they are described in this chapter. There are three origins of this tribe, or of the Jewish nation-one from Shelah, the son of Judah, by his Canaanite wife; another from Perez, and the third from Zerah, the sons of Judah by Tamar his daughter-in-law. That the whole Jewish nation was from these three sons of Judah is evident from the enumeration of the sons and grandsons of Jacob who came with him into Egypt (Genesis 46:12); and also from their classification according to families, in Moses:

The sons of Judah according to their families were: of Shelah, the family of the Shelanites; of Perez, the family of the Perezites; of Zerah, the family of the Zerahites (Numbers 26:20; 1 Chron. 4:21);

this shows what the origin of that nation was, namely, that one third of them was from the Canaanite mother, and that two thirds of them were from the daughter-in-law; consequently that all were from an illegitimate connection, for marriages with the daughters of the Canaanites were strictly forbidden (as is evident from Genesis 24:3; Exodus 34:16; Deuteronomy 7:3; 1 Kings 11:2; Ezra 9:1-15 10:1-44 d to lie with one’s daughter-in-law was a capital offense, as is evident in Moses:

If a man lie with his daughter-in-law, both of them shall surely be put to death; they have wrought confusion; their bloods shall be upon them (Leviticus 20:12).

Judah’s referring this deed with his daughter-in-law to the levirate law in which an ordinance is made regarding the brother, but by no means regarding the father (as appears from verse 26 of this chapter), implies that his sons by Tamar should be acknowledged as the sons of Er his firstborn, who was born of the Canaanite mother, and who was evil in the eyes of Jehovah, and was therefore caused to die (verse 7); for those who were born first to the husband’s brother were not his by whom they were conceived, but his whose seed they raised up, as is evident fromDeuteronomy 25:5-6, and also from verses 8 and 9 of this chapter. Moreover, those who were born of Tamar were born of fornication; for Judah thought when he went unto her that she was a harlot (verses 15-16, 21). This shows whence and of what quality was the origin of the Jewish nation, and that they spoke falsely when they said, “We were not born of fornication” (John 8:41).

[3] What this origin involves and represents is plain from what follows, namely, that their interiors were of such a quality, or had such an origin. Judah’s marrying a Canaanite involves an origin from the evil which is from the falsity of evil, for this is signified in the internal sense by “a daughter of a man, a Canaanite;” his lying with his daughter-in-law involves and represents damnation from falsified truth from evil, for everywhere in the Word whoredom signifies the falsification of truth (n. 3708). Evil from the falsity of evil is evil of life from false doctrine which has been hatched by the evil of the love of self (that is, by those who are in this evil), and confirmed by the sense of the letter of the Word. Such is the origin of evil with the Jewish nation, and such is its origin with some in the Christian world, especially with those who in the Word are meant by Babylon. This evil is of such a nature that it closes every way to the internal man, insomuch that nothing of conscience can be formed therein; for the evil which a person does from false doctrine, he believes to be good, because he believes it to be true; and therefore he does it freely and with delight, as allowable. Thus heaven is so closed to him that it cannot be opened.

[4] The quality of this evil may be shown by an example. With those who from the evil of the love of self believe that Jehovah has chosen a single nation only, and that all the rest of mankind are relatively slaves, and so vile that they may be killed at pleasure or be cruelly treated—as the Jewish nation believed, and at this day the Babylonish nation also believes—and confirm this belief from the sense of the letter of the Word, then whatever evil they do from this false doctrine and others built upon this as a foundation, is evil from the falsity of evil, and destroys the internal man, preventing any conscience from ever being formed therein. These are they spoken of in the Word who are said to be “in bloods,” for they are in cruel rage against the whole human race which does not adore their articles of faith, and thus themselves, and does not offer its gifts upon their altars.

[5] Take another example: with those who from the evil of the love of self and of the world believe that there must be someone as the Lord’s vicar on earth, who has the power of opening and shutting heaven, and thus of ruling over the minds and consciences of all, and who confirm this falsity from the sense of the letter of the Word, whatever of evil they do from this belief is evil from the falsity of evil, which in like manner destroys the internal man with those who from this evil claim for themselves this power, and in this way rule; and this evil is destructive to such a degree that they no longer know what the internal man is, nor that anyone has conscience, consequently they no longer believe that there is any life after death, nor that there is a heaven or a hell, no matter how they may speak of these things.

[6] This evil, as regards its quality, cannot be distinguished by men in the world from other evils, but in the other life it is known by the angels as in clear day; for evils and falsities are manifest in that life as to their distinctions of quality and origin, which are innumerable; and according to the genera and species of these also are the distinctions of the hells. Concerning these innumerable differences man knows scarcely anything; he merely believes that evil exists, but what its quality is he does not know, and this for the sole reason that he does not know what good is, and this because he does not know what charity is; for if he had known the good of charity he would have known also the opposites or evils, with their distinctions.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.