Bible

 

出埃及记 4

Studie

   

1 摩西回答:他们必不信我,也不我的话,必耶和华并没有向你显现。

2 耶和华对摩西:你里是甚麽?他:是杖。

3 耶和华:丢在上。他一丢下去,就变作摩西便跑开。

4 耶和华摩西:伸出来,拿住他的尾巴,他必在你中仍变为杖;

5 如此好叫他们信耶和华─他们祖宗的,就是亚伯拉罕的以撒的雅各,是向你显现了。

6 耶和华又对他:把放在怀里。他就把放在怀里,及至抽出来,不料,上长了大麻风,有那样白。

7 耶和华:再把放在怀里。他就再把放在怀里,及至从怀里抽出来,不料,已经复原,与周身的一样;

8 :倘或他们不你的话,也不信头一个神迹,他们必信第二个神迹。

9 这两个神迹若不信,也不你的话,你就从河里取些,倒在旱地上,你从河里取的必在旱地上变作血。

10 摩西耶和华阿,我素日不是能言的,就是从你对仆人说话以後,也是这样。我本是拙的。

11 耶和华对他:谁造人的呢?谁使人、耳聋、目明、眼瞎呢?岂不是我─耶和华麽?

12 现在去罢,我必赐你才,指教你所当的话。

13 摩西:主阿,你愿意打发谁,就打发谁去罢!

14 耶和华摩西发怒:不是有你的哥哥利未人亚伦麽?我知道他是能言的;现在他出来迎接你,他一见你,里就欢喜。

15 你要将当传给他;我也要赐你和他才,又要指教你们所当行的事。

16 他要替你对百姓说话;你要以他当作,他要以你当作

17 里要拿这杖,好行神迹。

18 於是,摩西回到他岳父叶忒罗那里,对他:求你容我回去见我在埃及的弟兄,他们还在不在。叶忒罗对摩西:你可以平平安安地去罢!

19 耶和华米甸摩西:你要回埃及去,因为寻索你命的人都死了

20 摩西就带着妻子和两个儿子,叫他们,回埃及去。摩西里拿着的杖。

21 耶和华摩西:你回到埃及的时候,要留意将我指示你的一切奇事行在法老面前。但我要使(或作:任凭;下同)他的刚硬,他必不容百姓去。

22 你要对法老耶和华这样以色列是我的儿子,我的长子

23 我对你说过:容我的儿子去,好事奉我。你还是不肯容他去。看哪,我要杀你的长子

24 摩西在住宿的地方,耶和华遇见他,想要杀他。

25 西坡拉就拿一块火石,割下他儿子的阳皮,丢在摩西前,:你真是我的血郎了。

26 这样,耶和华才放了他。西坡拉:你因割礼就是血郎了。

27 耶和华亚伦:你往旷野去迎接摩西。他就去,在遇见摩西,和他亲嘴。

28 摩西耶和华打发他所的言语和嘱咐他所行的神迹都告诉了亚伦

29 摩西亚伦就去招聚以色列的长老

30 亚伦耶和华摩西的一切了一遍,又在百姓眼前行了那些神迹,

31 百姓就信了。以色列人耶和华眷顾他们,鉴察他们的困苦,就低头下拜。

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 6987

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

6987. Who maketh man’s mouth? That this signifies utterance, is evident from the signification of “mouth,” as being the voice (of which above, n. 6985); and as it denotes the voice, it denotes utterance. What the “mouth” specifically signifies cannot be seen except from correspondence. The mouth together with the lips corresponds to the interior speech which is of the thought. The thought of man is active and passive; man has active thought when he speaks, and this may be called speaking thought; but his thought is passive when he does not speak; and the difference between the two can be seen by him who reflects. By the “mouth” of man is thus signified active or speaking thought, thus utterance.

[2] As regards active thought, which is signified by the “mouth,” be it known that this thought also is speaking thought in its own way, and that by the activity of this speech it excites the organs of the body corresponding thereto. It appears as if the words of the speech were in the thought, but this is a fallacy; it is only the sense of the speech which is there, the nature of which man can scarcely know, for it is the speech of his spirit, which speech is universal speech, such as is the speech of spirits in the other life. When this speech flows into the correspondent organs of the body, it presents the speech of words, which is vastly different from the thought that produces it, as is very evident from the fact that a man can think in one minute what takes him a long space of time to speak or write; and this would not be the case if this thought were composed of words, as is the speech of the mouth. It is from the correspondence of the speech of the thought and the speech of the mouth, that when a man comes after death among spirits, he knows how to speak in the universal language, thus with spirits, no matter what had been their language in the world; and that he then scarcely knows otherwise than that he speaks there as in the world, when yet the words of their speech are not words such as man uses in the body, but are the ideas which had been of his thought, one idea containing very many things. For this reason spirits can utter in a moment what a man can scarcely utter in half an hour, and even then there are many things within the same idea which cannot possibly be expressed by bodily speech.

[3] Yet the angels in heaven speak in a different way from spirits; for the angels who are in heaven have their speech from intellectual ideas, which by the philosophers are called immaterial ideas; whereas spirits have their speech from ideas of the imagination, which are called material ideas; hence in one idea of the thought of the angels there are contained very many things which spirits cannot utter by many series of their ideas, besides many things which they cannot express at all. But when a spirit becomes an angel, he is in angelic speech, just as a man when after death he becomes a spirit, is in the speech of spirits, and for a similar reason. From all this it can be seen what active thought is, namely, that it is the speech of man’s spirit.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.